This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/feb/03/church-of-england-college-apologises-students-queer-evening-prayer

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
C of E college apologises for students' attempt to 'queer evening prayer' C of E college apologises for students' attempt to 'queer evening prayer'
(35 minutes later)
A leading theological college that trains priests for the Church of England has apologised after it hosted a service to mark LGBT history month which referred to God as “the Duchess”. A leading theological college that trains priests for the Church of England has apologised after it hosted a service to mark LGBT history month that referred to God as “the Duchess”.
Student priests at Westcott House in Cambridge organised the evensong service on Tuesday in the college chapel. Advertised as a “Polari evening prayer in anticipation of LGBT+ history month”, it was described as a “liturgical experiment”. Polari is slang used by some gay people.Student priests at Westcott House in Cambridge organised the evensong service on Tuesday in the college chapel. Advertised as a “Polari evening prayer in anticipation of LGBT+ history month”, it was described as a “liturgical experiment”. Polari is slang used by some gay people.
A prayer referred to the “Fantabulosa fairy” and ended: “Praise ye the Duchess. The Duchess’s name be praised.” Psalm 19 was reworded to refer to “O Duchess, my butchness”.A prayer referred to the “Fantabulosa fairy” and ended: “Praise ye the Duchess. The Duchess’s name be praised.” Psalm 19 was reworded to refer to “O Duchess, my butchness”.
The service was “an attempt at queering the liturgy of evening prayer, locating the queer within the compass of faith, and recovering for the Christian tradition a sense of its own intrinsically subversive jouisance,” said a printed explanation. The service was “an attempt at queering the liturgy of evening prayer, locating the queer within the compass of faith, and recovering for the Christian tradition a sense of its own intrinsically subversive jouissance,” said a printed explanation.
The organisers said that just as Jesus welcomed the outcast, “today we might follow in the footsteps of his daring, boldly and outrageously welcoming the Queer (both human and divine) in a way never before attempted”. The organisers said that just as Jesus welcomed the outcast, “Today we might follow in the footsteps of his daring, boldly and outrageously welcoming the Queer (both human and divine) in a way never before attempted.”
The college principal, the Rev Canon Chris Chivers, said the service was “hugely regrettable”. The college principal, the Rev Canon Chris Chivers, said the service was “hugely regrettable”. It used “a form of liturgy which was not an authorised act of worship in line with the college’s procedures,” he said. “I fully recognise that the contents of the service are at variance with the doctrine and teaching of the Church of England, and that is hugely regrettable.”
It used “a form of liturgy which was not an authorised act of worship in line with the college’s procedures,” he said. The service had caused some members of the college “considerable upset and disquiet”. Chivers said he had spoken to the organisers and was “tightening the internal mechanisms of the house to ensure this never happens again”. The college hoped “to make a creative contribution to setting a different tone for the debate on human sexuality in the church. But this was not it,” he said.
“I fully recognise that the contents of the service are at variance with the doctrine and teaching of the Church of England and that is hugely regrettable.”
The service had caused some members of the college “considerable upset and disquiet”. Chivers said he had spoken to the organisers and was “tightening the internal mechanisms of the house to ensure this never happens again”.
The college hoped “to make a creative contribution to setting a different tone for the debate on human sexuality in the church. But this was not it,” he said.
Established in 1881, Westcott House says its mission is to “provide the foundation for a life of public ministry through the rigorous integration of spiritual and personal development, theological learning, and ministerial and practical experience”.Established in 1881, Westcott House says its mission is to “provide the foundation for a life of public ministry through the rigorous integration of spiritual and personal development, theological learning, and ministerial and practical experience”.
Last week, the C of E bishops alarmed conservative evangelicals within its ranks by saying that traditional doctrine on marriage should be interpreted to provide “maximum freedom” for gay and lesbian people.Last week, the C of E bishops alarmed conservative evangelicals within its ranks by saying that traditional doctrine on marriage should be interpreted to provide “maximum freedom” for gay and lesbian people.
Reform, a conservative evangelical group within the C of E, said that by recommending maximum freedom bishops had “ensured theological incoherence and hypocrisy will prevail for the foreseeable future”. Reform, a conservative evangelical group within the C of E, said that by recommending maximum freedom bishops had “ensured that theological incoherence and hypocrisy will prevail for the foreseeable future”.
Arun Arora, the C of E’s director of communications, said: “The principal of Westcott House has issued a statement where he says the service was ‘hugely regrettable’ and that ‘theological colleges are places of experiment and enquiry where people do make mistakes’. We would agree with both of those sentiments. The church should be a place which develops both risk-taking for the gospel and a no blame culture.” Arun Arora, the C of E’s director of communications, said: “The principal of Westcott House has issued a statement where he says the service was ‘hugely regrettable’ and that ‘theological colleges are places of experiment and inquiry where people do make mistakes’. We would agree with both of those sentiments. The church should be a place which develops both risk-taking for the gospel and a no-blame culture.”