This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/feb/02/right-to-be-forgotten-online-suffers-setback-after-japan-court-ruling
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| Japanese court rules against paedophile in 'right to be forgotten' online case | |
| (about 4 hours later) | |
| The campaign to recognise the “right to be forgotten” online has suffered a setback in Japan after the supreme court rejected a man’s demand to have references to his arrest for child prostitution removed from Google search results. | The campaign to recognise the “right to be forgotten” online has suffered a setback in Japan after the supreme court rejected a man’s demand to have references to his arrest for child prostitution removed from Google search results. |
| The court’s ruling this week comes a year after a district court recognised the plaintiff’s right to have details of his crime expunged online and to rebuild his life “unhindered” by records of his criminal past. That ruling was overturned by the Tokyo high court last July. | The court’s ruling this week comes a year after a district court recognised the plaintiff’s right to have details of his crime expunged online and to rebuild his life “unhindered” by records of his criminal past. That ruling was overturned by the Tokyo high court last July. |
| This week’s judgement, the first of its kind by Japan’s top court, contrasts with the legal approach being taken in Europe, where the EU’s court of justice recognised the right to be forgotten in 2014. | This week’s judgement, the first of its kind by Japan’s top court, contrasts with the legal approach being taken in Europe, where the EU’s court of justice recognised the right to be forgotten in 2014. |
| The Japanese plaintiff, who has not been named, had demanded that Google remove reports posted online more than four years ago detailing his arrest and conviction for breaking child prostitution and pornography laws, for which he was fined 500,000 yen ($4,400). | The Japanese plaintiff, who has not been named, had demanded that Google remove reports posted online more than four years ago detailing his arrest and conviction for breaking child prostitution and pornography laws, for which he was fined 500,000 yen ($4,400). |
| The man said that his case appeared whenever his name and address were entered into a Google search. | The man said that his case appeared whenever his name and address were entered into a Google search. |
| The supreme court said, however, that the public’s right to know outweighed the man’s right to privacy, given the serious nature of his crimes. | The supreme court said, however, that the public’s right to know outweighed the man’s right to privacy, given the serious nature of his crimes. |
| “Child prostitution is prohibited by the penal code and is a target of strong social condemnation,” Kyodo news quoted justice Kiyoko Okabe as saying. “The deletion (of references to the charges from search engines) can be demanded only when value of privacy protection clearly exceeds freedom of expression of search sites.” | “Child prostitution is prohibited by the penal code and is a target of strong social condemnation,” Kyodo news quoted justice Kiyoko Okabe as saying. “The deletion (of references to the charges from search engines) can be demanded only when value of privacy protection clearly exceeds freedom of expression of search sites.” |
| Google, which is appealing to France’s highest court over an order by the country’s data protection authority to censor its search results worldwide, welcomed the decision. | Google, which is appealing to France’s highest court over an order by the country’s data protection authority to censor its search results worldwide, welcomed the decision. |
| “We are pleased that the supreme court has unanimously recognised, based on existing privacy and defamation laws, that any decision to delete information from search results should prioritise the public’s right to information,” Taj Meadows, head of policy communications at Google Asia Pacific, said in a statement. | “We are pleased that the supreme court has unanimously recognised, based on existing privacy and defamation laws, that any decision to delete information from search results should prioritise the public’s right to information,” Taj Meadows, head of policy communications at Google Asia Pacific, said in a statement. |
| Jiji Press reported that Japanese district courts had received more than 50 petitions seeking the removal of search results in the 12 months up to September 2016. | Jiji Press reported that Japanese district courts had received more than 50 petitions seeking the removal of search results in the 12 months up to September 2016. |