This article is from the source 'independent' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/worlds-most-valuable-brands-facebook-google-apple-amazon-a7556571.html
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
The world's most valuable brands revealed | The world's most valuable brands revealed |
(about 9 hours later) | |
Google has snatched Apple’s title as the world’s most valuable brand, ending the iPhone maker’s five-year reign. | Google has snatched Apple’s title as the world’s most valuable brand, ending the iPhone maker’s five-year reign. |
According to a study by valuation and strategy consultancy Brand Finance, published on Wednesday, the monetary value of Google’s brand rose by 24 per cent last year to $109.5bn, propelling it to the top spot for the first time since 2011. | |
Apple’s value fell from $145.9bn in the previous year to $107.1bn. | Apple’s value fell from $145.9bn in the previous year to $107.1bn. |
“[Google] remains largely unchallenged in its core search business, which is the mainstay of its advertising income,” Brand Finance wrote in its report. | “[Google] remains largely unchallenged in its core search business, which is the mainstay of its advertising income,” Brand Finance wrote in its report. |
David Haigh, chief executive officer of Brand Finance, commented that Apple has recently struggled to maintain its technological advantage over rivals. | David Haigh, chief executive officer of Brand Finance, commented that Apple has recently struggled to maintain its technological advantage over rivals. |
“New iterations of the iPhone have delivered diminishing returns and there are signs that the company has reached a saturation point for its brand,” he said. | “New iterations of the iPhone have delivered diminishing returns and there are signs that the company has reached a saturation point for its brand,” he said. |
“The Chinese market, where Apple has enjoyed a dominant market share, is becoming far more competitive with local players entering the market in a meaningful way.” | “The Chinese market, where Apple has enjoyed a dominant market share, is becoming far more competitive with local players entering the market in a meaningful way.” |
But late Tuesday, before Brand Finance’s sturdy was published, Apple posted forecast-beating results for the most recent quarter, reclaiming the throne as the world’s top smartphone seller for the first time in five years – even beating arch rival Samsung. | |
Alphabet, Google’s parent company, reported in January better-than-expected revenue for the most recent quarter thanks to a fast-growing cloud-computing business and booming YouTube video advertising, but profits were hit by a one-off tax payment. | |
The study of 500 brands deemed Amazon the third most valuable, at $106.4m, followed by AT&T at $87m and Microsoft at $76.3m. Facebook claimed the ninth spot in the rankings with a value of a slither under $62m. | |
In Wednesday’s report Brand Finance also crowned Lego the world’s most powerful brand, which is defined as one whose enterprise value is most positively impacted by the strength of its brand. | |
The study found that much of the Danish family-owned company’s success is owed to its partnerships with the Star Wars, Harry Potter and Batman franchises. | The study found that much of the Danish family-owned company’s success is owed to its partnerships with the Star Wars, Harry Potter and Batman franchises. |
Other brands that made it into the top five “powerful” ranking included Google, Nike, Ferrari and Visa. | |
Walt Disney, which nabbed the title of most powerful brand last year, fell to sixth place. | |
“This may be because its 2016 Star Wars release was a spin-off and less successful than 2015’s reboot of the main franchise, one of the highest grossing films of all time,” Brand Finance wrote in the report. | “This may be because its 2016 Star Wars release was a spin-off and less successful than 2015’s reboot of the main franchise, one of the highest grossing films of all time,” Brand Finance wrote in the report. |
The company noted, however that it “remains a hugely powerful brand and will be closely watched during 2017 when the eighth instalment of Star Wars is released and could propel the brand up the rankings again”. | The company noted, however that it “remains a hugely powerful brand and will be closely watched during 2017 when the eighth instalment of Star Wars is released and could propel the brand up the rankings again”. |