This article is from the source 'independent' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/jewish-children-banned-from-seeing-their-transgender-parent-a7553431.html
The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 1 | Version 2 |
|---|---|
| Transgender woman banned from seeing children because it is 'incompatible' with their Jewish faith | Transgender woman banned from seeing children because it is 'incompatible' with their Jewish faith |
| (35 minutes later) | |
| A transgender woman has been banned from seeing her five children after a family court ruled it was not compatible with her ex-wife’s ultra-orthodox Jewish background. | A transgender woman has been banned from seeing her five children after a family court ruled it was not compatible with her ex-wife’s ultra-orthodox Jewish background. |
| The landmark ruling, seen by The Independent, was issued by Justice Peter Jackson at the family court in Manchester. It has been handed down after 12 months of the transgender woman asking for access to her five children. | The landmark ruling, seen by The Independent, was issued by Justice Peter Jackson at the family court in Manchester. It has been handed down after 12 months of the transgender woman asking for access to her five children. |
| At the centre of the fight between two parents were claims that the transgender parent, who is living as a woman, should not be allowed to see her children after leaving the ultra-orthodox Jewish community. | At the centre of the fight between two parents were claims that the transgender parent, who is living as a woman, should not be allowed to see her children after leaving the ultra-orthodox Jewish community. |
| This is because, barristers acting for the mother argued, it would lead to her children being ostracised by their ultra-orthodox community and unable to live normal lives due to their association with a transgender parent. However, Orthodox Jewish rabbis acting for the parent argued that Judaism did not believe transgender individuals should be punished in this way. | This is because, barristers acting for the mother argued, it would lead to her children being ostracised by their ultra-orthodox community and unable to live normal lives due to their association with a transgender parent. However, Orthodox Jewish rabbis acting for the parent argued that Judaism did not believe transgender individuals should be punished in this way. |
| Despite that, Justice Jackson concluded that the “risk” that “these children and their mother would be rejected by their community if the children were to have face-to-face contact with their father” was too great to allow contact. | Despite that, Justice Jackson concluded that the “risk” that “these children and their mother would be rejected by their community if the children were to have face-to-face contact with their father” was too great to allow contact. |
| “Weighing up the profound consequences for the children’s welfare of ordering or not ordering direct contact with their father, I have reached the unwelcome conclusion that the likelihood of the children and their mother being marginalised or excluded by the ultra-orthodox community is so real, and the consequences so great, that this one factor, despite its many disadvantages, must prevail over the many advantages of contact. | “Weighing up the profound consequences for the children’s welfare of ordering or not ordering direct contact with their father, I have reached the unwelcome conclusion that the likelihood of the children and their mother being marginalised or excluded by the ultra-orthodox community is so real, and the consequences so great, that this one factor, despite its many disadvantages, must prevail over the many advantages of contact. |
| “I therefore conclude with real regret, knowing the pain that it must cause, that the father’s application for direct contact must be refused.” The parent is instead allowed to indirectly contact her children four times a year on festivals and on their birthdays. | “I therefore conclude with real regret, knowing the pain that it must cause, that the father’s application for direct contact must be refused.” The parent is instead allowed to indirectly contact her children four times a year on festivals and on their birthdays. |
| The parent had claimed she was subject to domestic abuse by her ex-wife but that had been denied. | The parent had claimed she was subject to domestic abuse by her ex-wife but that had been denied. |
| Richy Thompson, campaigns manager at the British Humanist Association told The Independent the decision was “extremely sad” given the progress made towards equal rights for transgender people. “At a time when society is progressing towards having much more inclusive attitudes towards trans people and their fundamental rights, it is extremely sad that a religious community can hold such discriminatory attitudes, and threaten to ostracise children over a parent’s gender identity, that we might even end up with a family court judge entertaining a ruling like this one,” he said. | |
| The case highlighted the difficulties faced by religious communities like ultra-orthodox Jewish Charedis if they encounter modern influences. Charedi communities adhere to a strict 19th-century interpretation of Judaism and contact with the secular world can be taboo. | The case highlighted the difficulties faced by religious communities like ultra-orthodox Jewish Charedis if they encounter modern influences. Charedi communities adhere to a strict 19th-century interpretation of Judaism and contact with the secular world can be taboo. |