This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk_politics/7431764.stm

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Planning law debate 'a travesty' MPs attack planning law shake-up
(about 5 hours later)
The amount of time set aside for debate on proposed changes to planning law has prompted anger in the House of Commons. Plans to streamline planning decisions on big projects like airports have been attacked on all sides of the Commons.
John Redwood said it was a "travesty of democracy" and Patrick McCormack called it "an emasculation" of the Commons. Paul Truswell warned of a "tremendous amount of concern" among Labour MPs over plans to hand decisions on major projects to an independent commission.
Plaid Cymru's Elfyn Llywd said it was "absolutely atrocious" that 110 amendments were being "pushed through". Tory MP John Redwood said it would be an "unelected quango" and said the time given to debate it was a "travesty".
Minister John Healey said two full days had been allocated to discuss the planning bill. MPs voted by 248 to 193 in favour of the planned timetable. Local government minister John Healey said two full days had been allocated to discuss the planning bill.
MPs are now discussing the Bill itself, which largely applies only to planning laws in England. It includes a measure to take away ministers' and councils' planning powers over major projects like new airports and power stations. MPs are debating the Planning Bill, which largely applies only to planning laws in England. It includes a measure to take away ministers' and councils' planning powers over major projects like new airports and power stations.
'Unelected quango''Unelected quango'
Instead an independent commission would take decisions on major infrastructure - the government hopes it will speed up approvals for big projects. Instead an Infrastructure Planning Commission (IPC) would take decisions on major infrastructure - the government hopes it will speed up approvals for big projects.
Discussing the timetable for the debate, Conservative MP Mr Redwood said: "This is setting up an unelected quango to make extremely important decisions.... where there should be a stronger democratic input." More than 60 Labour MPs signed a motion opposing the IPC and on Monday Mr Truswell said there was a "tremendous amount of concern" among backbench Labour MPs about "key aspects of this particular Bill" including the planning commission.
Allowing merely two days on a very, very important bill is an absolute abuse of this House Nicholas Winterton This is setting up an unelected quango to make extremely important decisions John Redwood
He also said he was concerned that debate on sensitive issues like the planning commission were being "compressed into a two hour period next Monday night".
The amount of time set aside for debate also prompted anger among Conservative MPs.
Patrick McCormack called it "an emasculation" of the Commons and Jacqui Lait said Labour MPs' concern had forced the government to move the debate to a "graveyard slot".
'Absolutely atrocious'
Mr Redwood added: "This is setting up an unelected quango to make extremely important decisions where I, and many of my constituents, believe there should be a stronger democratic input."
He added: "It's a travesty of democracy that we should be expected to have allocated time on a range of very sensitive and constitutional matters".He added: "It's a travesty of democracy that we should be expected to have allocated time on a range of very sensitive and constitutional matters".
The government was accused of bringing forward a bill that was "barely recognisable" from that discussed at the earlier committee stage - because of the large amount of amendments made.The government was accused of bringing forward a bill that was "barely recognisable" from that discussed at the earlier committee stage - because of the large amount of amendments made.
Mr Winterton asked whether the government was "determined to get its legislation through at all costs, however it's done?" He added: "Allowing merely two days on a very, very important bill is an absolute abuse of this House." Plaid Cymru's Elfyn Llywd said it was "absolutely atrocious" that 110 amendments were being "pushed through".
Judgement taken
Labour MP Paul Truswell said he was concerned that debate on sensitive issues like the planning commission were being "compressed into a two hour period next Monday night".
Minister John Healey agreed it was a wide ranging and important bill - but said that was why the government had allocated two full days for the report stage.Minister John Healey agreed it was a wide ranging and important bill - but said that was why the government had allocated two full days for the report stage.
He told MPs he had reflected on a number of issues raised by the committee and then brought forward amendments - many of which he described as "technical".He told MPs he had reflected on a number of issues raised by the committee and then brought forward amendments - many of which he described as "technical".
"I have taken a judgement in allocating the time, in making sure as much time as possible for those areas likely to be of the most interest.""I have taken a judgement in allocating the time, in making sure as much time as possible for those areas likely to be of the most interest."
More than 60 Labour MPs signed a motion opposing plans for an independent commission to decide on big projects like airports and power stations.More than 60 Labour MPs signed a motion opposing plans for an independent commission to decide on big projects like airports and power stations.
The proposed Infrastructure Planning Commission is included in the Planning Bill, introduced last November.The proposed Infrastructure Planning Commission is included in the Planning Bill, introduced last November.
It calls for a "new system for approving major infrastructure of national importance", such as roads and waste plants.