This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/england/london/6165368.stm

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 3 Version 4
Woman loses fight to wear cross Woman loses fight to wear cross
(about 2 hours later)
A British Airways (BA) employee has lost her fight to openly wear a cross necklace at work at Heathrow.A British Airways (BA) employee has lost her fight to openly wear a cross necklace at work at Heathrow.
Nadia Eweida, 55, of Twickenham, has been on unpaid leave since her bosses told her she could not visibly wear her cross at the check-in counter.Nadia Eweida, 55, of Twickenham, has been on unpaid leave since her bosses told her she could not visibly wear her cross at the check-in counter.
She found out she had lost her appeal against the decision by BA when she met with the airline bosses on Monday.She found out she had lost her appeal against the decision by BA when she met with the airline bosses on Monday.
BA denied it had banned the wearing of crosses and said Ms Eweida had a right to a second appeal.BA denied it had banned the wearing of crosses and said Ms Eweida had a right to a second appeal.
It said its uniform policy stated that such items could be worn if concealed underneath the uniform.It said its uniform policy stated that such items could be worn if concealed underneath the uniform.
It is important to wear it to express my faith Nadia EweidaIt is important to wear it to express my faith Nadia Eweida
Ms Eweida said she was effectively "forced" to take unpaid leave after refusing to conceal the symbol.Ms Eweida said she was effectively "forced" to take unpaid leave after refusing to conceal the symbol.
She said during Monday's meeting, British Airways told her it respected her faith and accepted the cross was not jewellery, but would be standing by its original decision.She said during Monday's meeting, British Airways told her it respected her faith and accepted the cross was not jewellery, but would be standing by its original decision.
Ms Eweida added: "I am fairly disappointed but I'm looking forward to the next stage because the cross is important and the truth will be revealed.Ms Eweida added: "I am fairly disappointed but I'm looking forward to the next stage because the cross is important and the truth will be revealed.
HAVE YOUR SAY This is yet another example of how secularism is being misunderstood by those trying to enforce it Paul Elliott, UK Send us your comments "It is important to wear it to express my faith so that other people will know that Jesus loves them." HAVE YOUR SAY If it is acceptable to wear a veil, then yes it should be acceptable to wear a cross too Chris E, Norwich Send us your comments "It is important to wear it to express my faith so that other people will know that Jesus loves them."
Ms Eweida said people of other faiths were allowed to wear visible religious symbols such as headscarves and she wanted to be allowed to do the same.Ms Eweida said people of other faiths were allowed to wear visible religious symbols such as headscarves and she wanted to be allowed to do the same.
'Question of practicality''Question of practicality'
BA said in a statement: "British Airways has 34,000 uniformed staff, all of whom know they must abide by our uniform policy.BA said in a statement: "British Airways has 34,000 uniformed staff, all of whom know they must abide by our uniform policy.
"The policy does not ban staff from wearing a cross. It lays down that personal items of jewellery, including crosses may be worn - but underneath the uniform. Other airlines have the same policy."The policy does not ban staff from wearing a cross. It lays down that personal items of jewellery, including crosses may be worn - but underneath the uniform. Other airlines have the same policy.
"The policy recognises that it is not practical for some religious symbols - such as turbans and hijabs - to be worn underneath the uniform. This is purely a question of practicality. There is no discrimination between faiths."The policy recognises that it is not practical for some religious symbols - such as turbans and hijabs - to be worn underneath the uniform. This is purely a question of practicality. There is no discrimination between faiths.
"In Nadia Eweida's case, she is not suspended and we want her to come back to work. We have explained to her the need to comply with the uniform policy like all her colleagues whatever their faith.""In Nadia Eweida's case, she is not suspended and we want her to come back to work. We have explained to her the need to comply with the uniform policy like all her colleagues whatever their faith."
BA said Ms Eweida had been offered a non-uniformed post were she would be able to openly wear her cross but had refused to take it.BA said Ms Eweida had been offered a non-uniformed post were she would be able to openly wear her cross but had refused to take it.
She now has seven days to lodge another appeal against the airline's decision.She now has seven days to lodge another appeal against the airline's decision.