This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/world/middle_east/6163938.stm

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Saddam trial 'flawed and unsound' Saddam trial 'flawed and unsound'
(about 1 hour later)
The trial of Saddam Hussein was so flawed that its verdict is unsound, the advocacy group Human Rights Watch says.The trial of Saddam Hussein was so flawed that its verdict is unsound, the advocacy group Human Rights Watch says.
The former Iraqi leader was sentenced to death on 5 November after being convicted of crimes against humanity.The former Iraqi leader was sentenced to death on 5 November after being convicted of crimes against humanity.
But HRW said it had documented "serious administrative, procedural and substantive legal defects" that meant he did not get a fair trial.But HRW said it had documented "serious administrative, procedural and substantive legal defects" that meant he did not get a fair trial.
Saddam Hussein has two more weeks to lodge an appeal - but his lawyer claims he has been blocked from doing so.Saddam Hussein has two more weeks to lodge an appeal - but his lawyer claims he has been blocked from doing so.
Chief defence lawyer Khalil al-Dulaimi told the BBC his team had been prevented from filing the necessary papers. Chief defence lawyer Khalil al-Dulaimi told the BBC his team had been prevented from filing appeal papers. Under Iraqi law it must be done within a month of sentencing.
However, the chief prosecutor has told the BBC it was a fair trial. However, the chief prosecutor, Jafaar al-Mousawi, has told the BBC it was a fair trial.
He said the appeal would be automatic because a death sentence had been passed - and that the relevant papers had been sent to the appeal court.
Historical record
Saddam Hussein and seven co-defendants all faced charges of crimes against humanity relating to the deaths of 148 people in the mainly Shia town of Dujail following an assassination attempt on the Iraqi leader in 1982.Saddam Hussein and seven co-defendants all faced charges of crimes against humanity relating to the deaths of 148 people in the mainly Shia town of Dujail following an assassination attempt on the Iraqi leader in 1982.
Two of his co-defendants also received death sentences. Judge Raouf Abdel Rahman replaced an earlier chief judgeTwo of his co-defendants also received death sentences.
Landmark case Saddam Hussein is now being tried on a different set of charges relating to a military campaign against ethnic Kurds in the late 1980s, in which more than 180,000 people are alleged to have died.
HRW said the trial was among the most important since the Nazi trials in Nuremberg after World War II. The New York-based HRW group said the trials were among the most important since the Nazi trials in Nuremberg after World War II.
The group based its report on extensive observation of court proceedings, and interviews with judges, prosecutors, defence lawyers and court administrators involved in the trial. They "represent the first opportunity to create a historical record concerning some of the worst cases of human rights violations, and to begin the process of a methodical accounting of the policies and decisions that give rise to these events", the report said.
Judge Rauf Abdel Rahman replaced an earlier chief judgeThe trial took just over one year to complete and was the first case brought before the Iraqi High Tribunal. The BBC's David Loyn in Baghdad says HRW's disappointment is the greater because it considers the Iraqi court to have failed to take account of the international significance of this trial and the one currently under way.
Supporters of war crimes trials say that they can improve healing after conflict, our correspondent says, but like so much else in post-Saddam Iraq, his trial does not seem to have achieved that lofty ambition.
Lawyers murdered
HRW based its scathing assessment on extensive observation of court proceedings, and interviews with judges, prosecutors, defence lawyers and court administrators involved.
The imposition of the death penalty - an inherently cruel and inhumane punishment - in the wake of an unfair trial is indefensible Human Rights Watch
The trial took just over one year to complete and was the first case brought before the Iraqi High Tribunal.
Proceedings were marked by frequent outbursts by both judges and defendants.Proceedings were marked by frequent outbursts by both judges and defendants.
Three defence lawyers were murdered, three judges left the five-member panel and the original chief judge was replaced.Three defence lawyers were murdered, three judges left the five-member panel and the original chief judge was replaced.
Defence lawyers boycotted proceedings but HRW said court-appointed counsel that took their place lacked adequate training in international law.Defence lawyers boycotted proceedings but HRW said court-appointed counsel that took their place lacked adequate training in international law.
Saddam Hussein is also being tried on a different set of charges relating to a military campaign against ethnic Kurds in the late 1980s in which more than 180,000 people are alleged to have died. In addition, important documents were not given to defence lawyers in advance, no written transcript was kept and paperwork was lost, said HRW.
Other trials for alleged crimes under Saddam Hussein's leadership are likely. The defence was also prevented from cross-examining witnesses and the judges made asides that pre-judged Saddam Hussein.
'Indefensible penalty''Indefensible penalty'
HRW said the trials "represent the first opportunity to create a historical record concerning some of the worst cases of human rights violations, and to begin the process of a methodical accounting of the policies and decisions that give rise to these events".
The US-led Coalition Provisional Authority decided that the Dujail trial would be held by an Iraqi court in Iraq, ruling out an international tribunal or a mixed Iraqi-international court under UN auspices, the HRW report said.The US-led Coalition Provisional Authority decided that the Dujail trial would be held by an Iraqi court in Iraq, ruling out an international tribunal or a mixed Iraqi-international court under UN auspices, the HRW report said.
Three defence lawyers were murdered during the trialBecause Iraqi lawyers and judges had been isolated from international criminal law, this decision resulted in a court that lacked the expertise to prosecute crimes against humanity on its own, the report said.Three defence lawyers were murdered during the trialBecause Iraqi lawyers and judges had been isolated from international criminal law, this decision resulted in a court that lacked the expertise to prosecute crimes against humanity on its own, the report said.
Important documents were not given to defence lawyers in advance, no written transcript was kept and paperwork was lost, said HRW.
Defence counsel come under criticism in the report for trying to use the court as a political platform.Defence counsel come under criticism in the report for trying to use the court as a political platform.
"Under such circumstances," HRW concludes, "the soundness of the verdict is questionable. In addition, the imposition of the death penalty - an inherently cruel and inhumane punishment - in the wake of an unfair trial is indefensible." Meanwhile, the Iraqi government was guilty of influencing the independence of the judges, the report said, to the extent that the first chief judge resigned.
"Under such circumstances the soundness of the verdict is questionable," HRW concludes.
"In addition, the imposition of the death penalty - an inherently cruel and inhumane punishment - in the wake of an unfair trial is indefensible."