This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk_politics/7414456.stm
The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Previous version
1
Next version
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
MP expenses to be released to all | |
(1 day later) | |
Detailed breakdowns of expenses claimed by 14 politicians are to be released by the Commons, after it lost a three-year Freedom of Information battle. | Detailed breakdowns of expenses claimed by 14 politicians are to be released by the Commons, after it lost a three-year Freedom of Information battle. |
The details will be released to all media, not just the reporters who made the FOI requests as originally planned. | |
The Commons said it had decided to make the information, which includes receipts to back up claims, more widely available due to public interest. | |
The High Court said the claims must be handed over by 1600 BST on Friday. | |
MPs' expenses are published every year under nine main headings - including the additional costs allowance (ACA) to cover the costs of running a second home. | |
'Unsatisfactory' | 'Unsatisfactory' |
But for most only the total claimed is published, rather than a detailed breakdown showing what items had been claimed for. | But for most only the total claimed is published, rather than a detailed breakdown showing what items had been claimed for. |
Campaigners argued that the limited nature of checks on claims, many of which did not require a receipt, meant the system was open to abuse and an Information Tribunal agreed it was "deeply unsatisfactory". | Campaigners argued that the limited nature of checks on claims, many of which did not require a receipt, meant the system was open to abuse and an Information Tribunal agreed it was "deeply unsatisfactory". |
Last week the High Court backed the tribunal's ruling that details should be published and on Monday the Commons gave up its legal fight. | Last week the High Court backed the tribunal's ruling that details should be published and on Monday the Commons gave up its legal fight. |
The claims at issue were made in 2005 by 14 prominent politicians, including Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, David Cameron and Sir Menzies Campbell. | |
A detailed breakdown of the expenses of all MPs dating back to 2004 - likely to run to more than a million items - is due to be released in the autumn and in future the information will be released on a quarterly basis. | |
The MPs' home addresses will be published unless there is a specific concern about individual security. | |
Stalker threat | Stalker threat |
The High Court had ruled that MPs' addresses should be published - pointing out they were already disclosed when MPs sought nomination for election and if someone was determined to discover it, they were likely to be able to do so. | The High Court had ruled that MPs' addresses should be published - pointing out they were already disclosed when MPs sought nomination for election and if someone was determined to discover it, they were likely to be able to do so. |
The Tribunal had ruled however that addresses of MPs who had a good reason - for example a known stalker, terrorist or "other criminal threat" - could remain private. | The Tribunal had ruled however that addresses of MPs who had a good reason - for example a known stalker, terrorist or "other criminal threat" - could remain private. |
But some MPs are angry that their home addresses will be published. | |
Meanwhile Liberal Democrat MP Bob Russell has tabled a motion calling for a breakdown of the expenses of, and home addresses of, High Court judges. | Meanwhile Liberal Democrat MP Bob Russell has tabled a motion calling for a breakdown of the expenses of, and home addresses of, High Court judges. |
Labour MP David Winnick, a campaigner for Parliamentary transparency, said MPs needed to do more to explain why allowances were claimed. | Labour MP David Winnick, a campaigner for Parliamentary transparency, said MPs needed to do more to explain why allowances were claimed. |
Conservative MP Julian Lewis branded the plan to release MPs' addresses "barking mad" - and he hit back at the High Court's ruling by saying it should be made as difficult as possible to discover where they live. | |
'Anthrax letters' | |
Judges' addresses are kept secret to protect them from reprisals by criminals they have jailed - but Mr Lewis argued MPs should be entitled to the same protection. | |
He said letters to MPs in the Commons were security vetted - but publishing their home addresses would leave them vulnerable to hate mail and attacks by "extremists". | |
In a Commons debate on Thursday, he suggested a novel way someone could highlight the alleged dangers. | |
He told MPs: "I would buy myself a very large packet of white soap powder, I would then buy 646 envelopes and I would place a quantity of this soap powder in each of the envelopes and I would send it to the 646 private home addresses together with a little note in each saying 'Ha ha, you've just opened a packet of anthrax'." | |
MPs can claim up to £23,000 a year to spend on costs incurred while staying away from their main home - including televisions, rent or mortgage payments and up to £400 a month for food. | MPs can claim up to £23,000 a year to spend on costs incurred while staying away from their main home - including televisions, rent or mortgage payments and up to £400 a month for food. |
The Commons is conducting its own inquiry into MPs' pay and expenses. | The Commons is conducting its own inquiry into MPs' pay and expenses. |
Previous version
1
Next version