This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/sep/23/court-slashes-damages-owed-by-former-socgen-trader-jerome-kerviel

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Court slashes damages owed by former SocGen trader Jérôme Kerviel Court slashes damages owed by former SocGen trader Jérôme Kerviel
(35 minutes later)
A French court has cut the damages owed by former trader Jérôme Kerviel from €4.9bn ($5.5bn) to €1m. A French court has cut the damages owed by the former Société Générale trader Jérôme Kerviel from €4.9bn (£4.2bn) to €1m.
The appeal court near Paris ruled on Friday that Kerviel was “partly responsible” for huge losses suffered in 2008 by the bank Société Générale through his reckless financial trades. The appeal court in Versailles ruled on Friday that Kerviel’s reckless trades were “partly responsible” for the huge losses suffered by the bank in 2008.
But it also ruled that “deficiency” in the bank’s management controls and security systems contributed to the size of the losses, which Kerviel would have no realistic way of repaying. It also ruled, however, that “deficiencies” in the bank’s management control and security systems contributed to the size of the losses, which Kerviel would have had no realistic way of repaying.
“I’m hoping to get to zero (civil damages) in the end because I still think I do not owe anything to Société Générale. The battle continues,” Kerviel told reporters following the ruling, which is open to appeal. The case “used to be about €4.9bn. It doesn’t exist anymore,” he said. “I’m hoping to get to zero in the end because I still do not think I owe anything to Société Générale. The battle continues,” Kerviel told reporters following the ruling, which is open to appeal. The case “used to be about €4.9bn. It doesn’t exist anymore,” he said.
In one of the biggest trading fraud cases, Kerviel was sentenced to three years in prison for nearly bringing down the bank with the losses, just before the financial market meltdown in 2008. In one of the biggest trading fraud cases, Kerviel was sentenced to three years in prison for nearly bringing down the bank just before the onset of the 2008 financial crisis.
The 39-year-old has been found guilty of forgery, breach of trust and fraudulent computer use for covering up bets worth €50bn more than the market value of the entire bank at the time. The 39-year-old was found guilty of forgery, breach of trust and fraudulent computer use for covering up trades worth €50bn, more than the market value of the entire bank at the time.
In 2014, the Cour de cassation, France’s highest court, upheld Kerviel’s conviction and three-year sentence, but annulled the €4.9bn civil damages, saying they were “disproportionate” and that the bank had a share of responsibility for its losses. France’s highest court upheld Kerviel’s conviction and three-year sentence in 2014, but annulled the €4.9bn in civil damages, saying they were disproportionate and that Société Générale shared of responsibility for its losses.It also ordered a new civil trial.
The initial damages, equivalent to the total losses reported by the bank in the fraud, was so huge that Kerviel would not have been able to pay them. As a result, the court ordered a new civil trial.
Kerviel’s lawyer is now trying to get the criminal conviction overturned.Kerviel’s lawyer is now trying to get the criminal conviction overturned.
The legal saga has captured the national imagination. The battle is also about image and reputation for the bank and Kerviel, who has tried to portray himself as a victim of an improperly regulated banking sector and a crusader against the ills of the financial world.The legal saga has captured the national imagination. The battle is also about image and reputation for the bank and Kerviel, who has tried to portray himself as a victim of an improperly regulated banking sector and a crusader against the ills of the financial world.