This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk_politics/7404031.stm

The article has changed 12 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Ruling due in MPs' expenses fight Commons loses MPs' expenses fight
(about 2 hours later)
The High Court will decide later whether MPs can keep details of their second home expenses private. The House of Commons has lost its High Court battle over an information watchdog's decision to force disclosure of MPs' expenses.
Under their "additional costs allowance", MPs can claim up to £23,000 a year towards a second residence. The Commons challenged the Information Tribunal's "unlawfully intrusive" demand that a detailed breakdown of second home allowances must be given.
In January, 14 MPs, including Gordon Brown, were told to disclose details and addresses of those homes. The Commons also attempted to overturn the Tribunal's decision that MPs' addresses should be disclosed.
But a group led by Commons Speaker Michael Martin challenged the ruling, arguing that publishing MPs' addresses could be a security risk. But the challenge was dismissed earlier by the High Court.
The allowance covers expenditure incurred when an MP is away from home on parliamentary duties, such as the cost of furniture and household bills.
'John Lewis list'
The original demand for a detailed breakdown of MPs' additional costs allowances was made under the Freedom of Information Act.
The Information Tribunal said the breakdown should be given, but the battle was then taken to the High Court by the Commons Commission.
Friday's ruling may not be the end of the matter, as both sides are free to appeal against it.
MPs were criticised when the so-called "John Lewis list" of household items was published earlier this year.
All of them could be bought using the second home allowance, and included £10,000 kitchens and £6,000 bathrooms.
The Speaker himself was criticised when it emerged that his wife had claimed £4,139 on taxis - largely for shopping trips.
But on Wednesday, Parliament's standards chief John Lyon ruled Mary Martin's claims were "reasonable".