This article is from the source 'rtcom' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.rt.com/usa/356418-state-iran-cash-contingency/

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Ransom after all? $400m to Iran was ‘contingent’ on Americans’ release Ransom after all? $400m to Iran was ‘contingent’ on Americans’ release
(35 minutes later)
A shipment of $400 million in cash to Iran in January was “contingent” on the release of four imprisoned Americans, the US State Department said Thursday, addressing accusations that it was a “ransom” payment.A shipment of $400 million in cash to Iran in January was “contingent” on the release of four imprisoned Americans, the US State Department said Thursday, addressing accusations that it was a “ransom” payment.
Wooden pallets stacked with hard currency such as euros and Swiss francs were flown into Iran on January 17, the same day the US exchanged seven Iranian prisoners for four Americans, US media reported earlier this month. US officials maintained that the cash transfer was entirely separate from the prisoner swap.“As we’ve made clear, the negotiations over the settlement of an outstanding claim… were completely separate from the discussions about returning our American citizens home,” State Department spokesman John Kirby had told the Wall Street Journal.On Thursday, however, Kirby said that the cash delivery was “contingent” on Iran’s willingness to release the Americans, according to AP. The US withheld delivery of the cash until the Americans had left Tehran, Kirby told reporters. Wooden pallets stacked with $400 million worth of euros and Swiss francs were flown into Iran on January 17, the same day the US exchanged seven Iranian prisoners for four Americans, the Wall Street Journal reported earlier this month.
The cash delivery was the first installment of the $1.7 billion the US agreed to pay Iran under the terms of the July 2015 nuclear deal. That is the sum, with interest, held frozen by Washington since 1979, when the pro-US government of Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi was overthrown in the Islamic revolution. The funds had been deposited in the US to pay for a shipment of American fighter jets, which never went through.READ MORE: US 'secretly shipped' $400mn to Iran before release of 4 hostages report  State Department spokesman John Kirby said that the US took advantage of the July 2015 nuclear deal to bundle the talks about releasing the prisoners with the settlement over the frozen Iranian funds.
“I don’t think that anybody in the administration is going to make any apology for taking advantage of these opportunities,”he told reporters at a press briefing on Thursday.
The cash delivery was “contingent” on Iran’s willingness to release the Americans, Kirby said. To “retain maximum leverage” over Iran, the US withheld the payment until the Americans had left Tehran.
Two weeks ago, however, Kirby was saying that the cash transfer was entirely separate from the prisoner swap.
"As we’ve made clear, the negotiations over the settlement of an outstanding claim… were completely separate from the discussions about returning our American citizens home,” he was quoted as saying by the Journal.
The cash delivery was the first installment of the $1.7 billion the US was obligated to pay Iran under an international settlement. That is the sum, with interest, held frozen by Washington since 1979, when the pro-US government of Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi was overthrown in the Islamic revolution. The funds had been deposited in the US to pay for a shipment of American fighter jets, which never went through.
READ MORE: US 'secretly shipped' $400mn to Iran before release of 4 hostages – report 
None of the funds were in US dollars, as such transactions are still illegal under US law. Instead, the euros and francs were procured from the Dutch and Swiss central banks, the Wall Street Journal reported.None of the funds were in US dollars, as such transactions are still illegal under US law. Instead, the euros and francs were procured from the Dutch and Swiss central banks, the Wall Street Journal reported.