This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/scotland/glasgow_and_west/7372861.stm

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 5 Version 6
Judges ponder Anwar contempt case Judges ponder Anwar contempt case
(9 minutes later)
Judges are deciding whether human rights solicitor Aamer Anwar committed contempt of court, following a hearing at the High Court in Edinburgh.Judges are deciding whether human rights solicitor Aamer Anwar committed contempt of court, following a hearing at the High Court in Edinburgh.
It follows comments made by Mr Anwar at the end of the trial of a man from Clackmannanshire who had been found guilty of terrorism offences.It follows comments made by Mr Anwar at the end of the trial of a man from Clackmannanshire who had been found guilty of terrorism offences.
The trial judge considered it to be contempt of court and referred it to three senior colleagues. The trial judge considered the comments to be contempt of court and referred them to three senior colleagues.
The judges said they wanted to have time to think about their decision.The judges said they wanted to have time to think about their decision.
'Disparaging remarks''Disparaging remarks'
Mr Anwar made his comments following the trial of Mohammed Atif Siddique outside the High Court in Glasgow in September.Mr Anwar made his comments following the trial of Mohammed Atif Siddique outside the High Court in Glasgow in September.
Moments after the jury delivered its verdict, he said it was "a tragedy for justice and for freedom of speech".Moments after the jury delivered its verdict, he said it was "a tragedy for justice and for freedom of speech".
He claimed the computing student's case was heard in an "atmosphere ofhostility" in the aftermath of the attack on Glasgow Airport, and alleged theprosecution was "driven by the State". He claimed the computing student's case was heard in an "atmosphere of hostility" in the aftermath of the attack on Glasgow Airport, and alleged the prosecution was "driven by the State".
Lord Carloway, who heard the 19-day trial, accused the solicitor of making"disparaging remarks" about him, the jury, and the prosecution. Lord Carloway, who heard the 19-day trial, accused the solicitor of making "disparaging remarks" about him, the jury, and the prosecution.
He passed the decision on whether contempt of court had been committed to the High Court.He passed the decision on whether contempt of court had been committed to the High Court.
It's a fundamental principle that court hearings which are held in public can be fully and freely commented upon Paul McBride QC It's a fundamental principle that court hearings which are held in public can be fully and freely commented upon Paul McBride QC At a packed hearing before three senior judges in Edinburgh, defence lawyer Paul McBride QC argued this was an "over-reaction" by the trial judge.
At a packed hearing before three senior judges in Edinburgh, defence lawyer Paul McBride QC argued this was an"over-reaction" by the trial judge. "A solicitor, in my respectful submission, may take reasonable steps to deal with his client's reputation following a decision taken by a court," said Mr McBride.
"A solicitor, in my respectful submission, may take reasonable steps to deal with his client's reputation following a decision taken by a court," said Mr McBride. "It's a fundamental principle that court hearings which are held in public can be fully and freely commented upon, whether to compliment and praise, or whether to criticise." "It's a fundamental principle that court hearings which are held in public can be fully and freely commented upon, whether to compliment and praise, or whether to criticise."
He said an accused person's protestations of innocence, delivered through a solicitor, could not amount to a contempt of court.He said an accused person's protestations of innocence, delivered through a solicitor, could not amount to a contempt of court.
Judge Lord Osborne, sitting with Lords Kingarth and Wheatley, said they wanted to have time to think about what has been said and would give their decision in due course.Judge Lord Osborne, sitting with Lords Kingarth and Wheatley, said they wanted to have time to think about what has been said and would give their decision in due course.
"It is to be hoped that we will be able to do that in the near future becausewe realise that it is no doubt painful for Mr Anwar to have this matterundetermined," said Lord Osborne. "It is to be hoped that we will be able to do that in the near future because we realise that it is no doubt painful for Mr Anwar to have this matter undetermined," said Lord Osborne.
'Difficult time''Difficult time'
Speaking outside court, Mr Anwar said he could not comment much because proceedings were still live. But he said: "I would just like to thank all the people who provided supportattending court today. Speaking outside court, Mr Anwar said he could not comment much because proceedings were still live. But he said: "I would just like to thank all the people who provided support attending court today.
"It's been a very difficult time.""It's been a very difficult time."
Siddique, from Alva, in Clackmannanshire, was found guilty after trial ofproviding material on bomb-making and weapons training, and threatening to become a suicide bomber. Siddique, from Alva, in Clackmannanshire, was found guilty after trial of providing material on bomb-making and weapons training, and threatening to become a suicide bomber.
He was jailed for eight years in October.He was jailed for eight years in October.