This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk/6146678.stm
The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Previous version
1
Next version
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
'Cold turkey' pay-out of £750,000 | |
(30 minutes later) | |
Payments totalling £750,000 will go to 197 prisoners and former inmates forced to stop taking drugs by going "cold turkey" in jail. | Payments totalling £750,000 will go to 197 prisoners and former inmates forced to stop taking drugs by going "cold turkey" in jail. |
The damages, approved by a High Court judge, follow their claims that the practice amounted to an assault and breach of human rights. | The damages, approved by a High Court judge, follow their claims that the practice amounted to an assault and breach of human rights. |
The Home Office "reluctantly" opted on Monday to settle a test case involving six men out of court to minimise costs. | The Home Office "reluctantly" opted on Monday to settle a test case involving six men out of court to minimise costs. |
It said the cases dated back to the early 1990s. | It said the cases dated back to the early 1990s. |
The six men said once in jail, and under the responsibility of the Prison Service in England and Wales, they were made to go "cold turkey" - where drugs are withdrawn or cut short. | The six men said once in jail, and under the responsibility of the Prison Service in England and Wales, they were made to go "cold turkey" - where drugs are withdrawn or cut short. |
They had used heroin and other opiates and were understood to have received alternative treatment before prison. | They had used heroin and other opiates and were understood to have received alternative treatment before prison. |
The claimants brought the action based on trespass, because they say they did not consent to the treatment, and for alleged clinical negligence. | The claimants brought the action based on trespass, because they say they did not consent to the treatment, and for alleged clinical negligence. |
Lawyers said all 197 can now expect to receive over £3,750 each. | Lawyers said all 197 can now expect to receive over £3,750 each. |
They said all inmates had agreed to the deal, except for two who have yet to make their decision. | They said all inmates had agreed to the deal, except for two who have yet to make their decision. |
In court, Richard Hermer, who appeared for the six test case inmates, said the Home Office had admitted its policy on drug-dependent prisoners was unlawful and "inevitably means that such a policy must be changed with immediate effect". | |
'Minimum standard' | |
He said the case was essentially "a medical negligence claim - not a human rights claim" which identified "the minimum standard of treatment deemed reasonable to treat individuals with drug dependency problems". | |
He said that the the Prison Service had "accepted that they failed to provide this minimum standard". | |
Mr Hermer added that had the matter gone to full trial inmates' evidence would have shown the "inadequacies" of treatment, which he said caused short-term suffering and was also counter-productive to rehabilitation. |
Previous version
1
Next version