This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/16/us/the-stanford-sexual-assault-case-what-you-might-have-missed.html

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
The Stanford Sexual Assault Case: What You Might Have Missed The Stanford Sexual Assault Case: What You May Have Missed
(about 2 hours later)
With much of the public’s attention focused on other gripping news this past week, developments in the controversial Stanford sexual assault case may have escaped your notice. With much of the public’s attention focused on other news this past week, developments in the controversial Stanford sexual assault case may have escaped your notice.
Here are some of the recent happenings:Here are some of the recent happenings:
■ In an unusual move, prosecutors on Tuesday had Judge Aaron Persky of the Santa Clara County Superior Court removed from hearing a case in which a male nurse was accused of sexually assaulting an anesthetized female patient.■ In an unusual move, prosecutors on Tuesday had Judge Aaron Persky of the Santa Clara County Superior Court removed from hearing a case in which a male nurse was accused of sexually assaulting an anesthetized female patient.
Prosecutors filed a peremptory challenge to Judge Persky after he dismissed charges against a woman in an unrelated misdemeanor theft trial on Monday. That objection automatically prevented him from presiding over a preliminary hearing in the sexual assault case.Prosecutors filed a peremptory challenge to Judge Persky after he dismissed charges against a woman in an unrelated misdemeanor theft trial on Monday. That objection automatically prevented him from presiding over a preliminary hearing in the sexual assault case.
“We are disappointed and puzzled at Judge Persky’s unusual decision to unilaterally dismiss a case before the jury could deliberate,” the Santa Clara district attorney, Jeff Rosen, said in a statement. “After this and the recent turn of events, we lack confidence that Judge Persky can fairly participate in this upcoming hearing in which a male nurse sexually assaulted an anesthetized female patient.”“We are disappointed and puzzled at Judge Persky’s unusual decision to unilaterally dismiss a case before the jury could deliberate,” the Santa Clara district attorney, Jeff Rosen, said in a statement. “After this and the recent turn of events, we lack confidence that Judge Persky can fairly participate in this upcoming hearing in which a male nurse sexually assaulted an anesthetized female patient.”
The nurse, Cecil Webb, is accused of touching the genitals and breasts of a sedated woman in 2014 at Kaiser Permanente’s Santa Clara Medical Center, according to The San Jose Mercury News. He was charged with a felony count of sexual battery.The nurse, Cecil Webb, is accused of touching the genitals and breasts of a sedated woman in 2014 at Kaiser Permanente’s Santa Clara Medical Center, according to The San Jose Mercury News. He was charged with a felony count of sexual battery.
The backlash has also grown over what critics have denounced as the judge’s too-lenient sentence this month for Brock Allen Turner, 20, a former Stanford student and champion swimmer convicted of sexually assaulting an intoxicated, unconscious woman behind a Dumpster in January 2015.The backlash has also grown over what critics have denounced as the judge’s too-lenient sentence this month for Brock Allen Turner, 20, a former Stanford student and champion swimmer convicted of sexually assaulting an intoxicated, unconscious woman behind a Dumpster in January 2015.
Judge Persky, 54, had been harshly criticized, and even threatened, for sentencing Mr. Turner to six months in jail and three years probation for three felony counts: intent to commit rape, sexual penetration with a foreign object of an intoxicated person and sexual penetration with a foreign object of an unconscious person.Judge Persky, 54, had been harshly criticized, and even threatened, for sentencing Mr. Turner to six months in jail and three years probation for three felony counts: intent to commit rape, sexual penetration with a foreign object of an intoxicated person and sexual penetration with a foreign object of an unconscious person.
■ On Monday, The Palo Alto Weekly published a scathing anonymous letter from a juror in the Stanford case who said he was “absolutely shocked and appalled” by the sentence. The publication said it had verified the letter writer’s identity by inspecting his court-issued attendance certificate.■ On Monday, The Palo Alto Weekly published a scathing anonymous letter from a juror in the Stanford case who said he was “absolutely shocked and appalled” by the sentence. The publication said it had verified the letter writer’s identity by inspecting his court-issued attendance certificate.
“After the guilty verdict, I expected that this case would serve as a very strong deterrent to on-campus assaults, but with the ridiculously lenient sentence that Brock Turner received, I am afraid that it makes a mockery of the whole trial and the ability of the justice system to protect victims of assault and rape,” the juror wrote. “Clearly there are few to no consequences for a rapist even if they are caught in the act of assaulting a defenseless, unconscious person.”“After the guilty verdict, I expected that this case would serve as a very strong deterrent to on-campus assaults, but with the ridiculously lenient sentence that Brock Turner received, I am afraid that it makes a mockery of the whole trial and the ability of the justice system to protect victims of assault and rape,” the juror wrote. “Clearly there are few to no consequences for a rapist even if they are caught in the act of assaulting a defenseless, unconscious person.”
■ At least 10 potential jurors have refused to work with Judge Persky in the new sexual assault trial, according to The San Jose Mercury News.■ At least 10 potential jurors have refused to work with Judge Persky in the new sexual assault trial, according to The San Jose Mercury News.
“I can’t believe what you did,” one juror said to the judge, referring to his sentence for Mr. Turner.“I can’t believe what you did,” one juror said to the judge, referring to his sentence for Mr. Turner.
The judge responded to each complaint with “I understand” and dismissed the potential jurors.The judge responded to each complaint with “I understand” and dismissed the potential jurors.