This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-36534907

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Supreme Court to hear 'wheelchair vs buggy' bus case Supreme Court to hear 'wheelchair vs buggy' bus case
(about 14 hours later)
A case that will determine whether bus companies should make people with pushchairs and others move from buses' disabled spaces will be heard at the Supreme Court later. A wheelchair user who says bus firms should make able-bodied people move from buses' disabled spaces has taken his case to the Supreme Court.
Wheelchair user Doug Paulley was told he could not travel on a bus to Leeds in 2012 when a mother with a pushchair refused to move from the disabled area. Doug Paulley was told he could not get on a bus to Leeds in 2012 when a mother with a pushchair refused to move.
He says FirstGroup's "requesting, not requiring" policy is discriminatory. He says FirstGroup's "requesting, not requiring" policy is discriminatory, but the bus operator says it is the most feasible that can be employed.
The bus operator says its policy is the most feasible that can be employed. Judgement is likely to be reserved and will be delivered in the coming months.
Mr Paulley won an initial case against the operator FirstGroup Plc, declaring its policy of "requesting, not requiring" able-bodied passengers to move to be unlawful disability discrimination.Mr Paulley won an initial case against the operator FirstGroup Plc, declaring its policy of "requesting, not requiring" able-bodied passengers to move to be unlawful disability discrimination.
FirstGroup appealed successfully to the Court of Appeal in 2014.FirstGroup appealed successfully to the Court of Appeal in 2014.
'Reasonable adjustments''Reasonable adjustments'
This is a case about a man getting on a bus, but it has resulted in a four-year legal battle that has now reached the highest court in the land.This is a case about a man getting on a bus, but it has resulted in a four-year legal battle that has now reached the highest court in the land.
Speaking exclusively to the BBC, Mr Paulley said: "I appreciate it is difficult with kids and luggage and everything else, to fold a pushchair, or to move it, but ultimately unless she did that she is effectively stopping me from being able to use that bus.Speaking exclusively to the BBC, Mr Paulley said: "I appreciate it is difficult with kids and luggage and everything else, to fold a pushchair, or to move it, but ultimately unless she did that she is effectively stopping me from being able to use that bus.
"It's about the reasonable adjustments that organisations have to make so that disabled people can have access to the things that other people in society take for granted.""It's about the reasonable adjustments that organisations have to make so that disabled people can have access to the things that other people in society take for granted."
Mr Paulley sued the bus company FirstGroup and won a ruling that its policy of requesting, but not requiring, able-bodied people to move from the disabled space was unlawful discrimination.
Under the Equality Act 2010, companies providing services must make reasonable adjustments to accommodate the disabled.Under the Equality Act 2010, companies providing services must make reasonable adjustments to accommodate the disabled.
Mr Paulley was awarded £5,500 in compensation and FirstGroup was given six months to change its policy of asking - but not making - able-bodied passengers vacate the wheelchair space.Mr Paulley was awarded £5,500 in compensation and FirstGroup was given six months to change its policy of asking - but not making - able-bodied passengers vacate the wheelchair space.
But the judgement in Mr Paulley's favour was reversed by the Court of Appeal in 2014, which ruled that although wheelchair users have priority to occupy the wheelchair space, there is no legal requirement for bus drivers to move other passengers from it.But the judgement in Mr Paulley's favour was reversed by the Court of Appeal in 2014, which ruled that although wheelchair users have priority to occupy the wheelchair space, there is no legal requirement for bus drivers to move other passengers from it.
Mr Paulley appealed against that ruling and now what has been dubbed the "battle between the wheelchair and the buggy" has reached the highest court in the land.Mr Paulley appealed against that ruling and now what has been dubbed the "battle between the wheelchair and the buggy" has reached the highest court in the land.
'Sending a message''Sending a message'
His case is being funded by the Equality and Human Rights Commission. His solicitor Chris Fry, of Unity Law, said: "A panel of seven Supreme Court judges is unusual, and a reflection of the significance of the case."
He said he hoped the court would "finally make the correct legal and moral decision" in support of social inclusion for disabled people.
Mr Paulley's case is being funded by the Equality and Human Rights Commission.
Its chief executive Rebecca Hilsenrath told the BBC: "For us, this case is about sending a message across the country to bus companies to put in place policies, clear guidelines, training for bus drivers so that they are able to manage the situation so that they give priority to those in wheelchairs."Its chief executive Rebecca Hilsenrath told the BBC: "For us, this case is about sending a message across the country to bus companies to put in place policies, clear guidelines, training for bus drivers so that they are able to manage the situation so that they give priority to those in wheelchairs."
The case is the first disability discrimination case involving service providers to be heard by the Supreme Court.The case is the first disability discrimination case involving service providers to be heard by the Supreme Court.
FirstGroup maintains that its policy of "requesting, not requiring" able-bodied people to move from the wheelchair space is lawful.FirstGroup maintains that its policy of "requesting, not requiring" able-bodied people to move from the wheelchair space is lawful.
Gyles Fearnley, managing director of its bus division, said: "It is very rare for a passenger to refuse to move. Giles Fearnley, managing director of its bus division, said: "It is very rare for a passenger to refuse to move.
"Our drivers will ask a passenger in the strongest, politest way they can to move, and we train them to do so."Our drivers will ask a passenger in the strongest, politest way they can to move, and we train them to do so.
"When someone does refuse to move it is extraordinarily unfortunate, but we do believe that the approach we take is the most feasible under the circumstances.""When someone does refuse to move it is extraordinarily unfortunate, but we do believe that the approach we take is the most feasible under the circumstances."
The judgment is expected to have wide-ranging implications for bus, train and other transport companies and service providers.The judgment is expected to have wide-ranging implications for bus, train and other transport companies and service providers.
The hearing is expected to last a day and judgment will be reserved to a later date.