This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/may/10/facebook-trending-conservative-news-senate-committee-letter

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
US senator demands Facebook explain allegations it censors conservative news US senator demands Facebook explain allegations it censors conservative news
(35 minutes later)
A top US Senate Republican demanded Tuesday that Facebook explain allegations that it suppressed conservative articles on users’ homepages as part of a political agenda. A top US Senate Republican demanded on Tuesday that Facebook explain allegations that it suppressed conservative articles on users’ homepages as part of a political agenda.
Related: Facebook denies censoring conservative stories from trending topicsRelated: Facebook denies censoring conservative stories from trending topics
Senator John Thune, a party leader and chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, which has jurisdiction over technology firms, sent a terse letter to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, asking him to explain accusations that he “misleads the public”. Senator John Thune, a party leader and chairman of the Senate commerce committee, which has jurisdiction over technology firms, sent a terse letter to Facebook’s CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, asking him to explain accusations that he “misleads the public”.
The social media juggernaut faces tough questions this week from conservatives following a series of stories in Gizmodo that its news “curators” injected stories into the trending articles section in the top-right corner of its home page. Many users, apparently including Thune, assumed the articles in that space were the ones users shared the most on the service.The social media juggernaut faces tough questions this week from conservatives following a series of stories in Gizmodo that its news “curators” injected stories into the trending articles section in the top-right corner of its home page. Many users, apparently including Thune, assumed the articles in that space were the ones users shared the most on the service.
Citing one former anonymous curator, Gizmodo reported that Facebook news contractors were told to suppress content of interest to conservative readers. Facebook has denied that allegation and said it has guidelines to “ensure consistency and neutrality” in the topics it promotes.Citing one former anonymous curator, Gizmodo reported that Facebook news contractors were told to suppress content of interest to conservative readers. Facebook has denied that allegation and said it has guidelines to “ensure consistency and neutrality” in the topics it promotes.
Late Monday, Tom Stocky, Facebook’s vice president of search, wrote in a Facebook post: “We take these reports extremely seriously, and have found no evidence that the anonymous allegations are true.” He added that the accused censorship was “technically not feasible” with their tools. Late Monday, Tom Stocky, Facebook’s vice-president of search, wrote in a Facebook post: “We take these reports extremely seriously, and have found no evidence that the anonymous allegations are true.” He added that the accused censorship was “technically not feasible” with their tools.
Regardless of this specific incident, the allegations reflect broader unease about how Facebook wields its influence in what media its users read. By traditional measures, Facebook’s “trending” section could be considered the most popular front page on the internet.Regardless of this specific incident, the allegations reflect broader unease about how Facebook wields its influence in what media its users read. By traditional measures, Facebook’s “trending” section could be considered the most popular front page on the internet.
Related: Facebook must be more transparent about how it delivers news | Nellie BowlesRelated: Facebook must be more transparent about how it delivers news | Nellie Bowles
The mainstream media is accused of bias regularly, and deciding which stories get the best placement inherently is a subjective process. But rightly or wrongly, many users expect that Silicon Valley somehow has found a way to neutralize the news business. The mainstream media is accused of bias regularly, and deciding which stories get the best placement is an inherently subjective process. But rightly or wrongly, many users expect that Silicon Valley somehow has found a way to neutralize the news business.
Given American free-speech law, it’s also unclear if the US Senate has any jurisdiction over how Facebook – or any other company – promotes certain articles.Given American free-speech law, it’s also unclear if the US Senate has any jurisdiction over how Facebook – or any other company – promotes certain articles.
For instance, Thune asks Facebook to quantify, “all news stories removed from or injected into the Trending Topics section since January 2014”. It’s unclear how Facebook would create such a list that covers more than two years of digital news.For instance, Thune asks Facebook to quantify, “all news stories removed from or injected into the Trending Topics section since January 2014”. It’s unclear how Facebook would create such a list that covers more than two years of digital news.
In a written statement, a Facebook representative said the company was “continuing to investigate whether any violations took place”.In a written statement, a Facebook representative said the company was “continuing to investigate whether any violations took place”.
As for the letter from Congress, Facebook said, “We have received Sen Thune’s request for more information about how Trending Topics works, and look forward to addressing his questions.”As for the letter from Congress, Facebook said, “We have received Sen Thune’s request for more information about how Trending Topics works, and look forward to addressing his questions.”