This article is from the source 'independent' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/british-expats-will-not-be-able-to-vote-in-eu-referendum-high-court-rules-a7004751.html

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 4 Version 5
British expats living outside of UK for more than 15 years will not be able to vote in EU referendum, high court rules British expats living outside of UK for more than 15 years will not be able to vote in EU referendum, high court rules
(about 1 hour later)
Expats who have been living outside of the UK for more than 15 years will not be able to vote in the EU referendum, the High Court has ruled.Expats who have been living outside of the UK for more than 15 years will not be able to vote in the EU referendum, the High Court has ruled.
A legal challenge was brought by 94-year-old Second World War veteran Harry Shindler, who lives in Italy, and Belgian resident Jacquelyn MacLennan, against the '15 year rule' in the EU Referendum Act 2015.A legal challenge was brought by 94-year-old Second World War veteran Harry Shindler, who lives in Italy, and Belgian resident Jacquelyn MacLennan, against the '15 year rule' in the EU Referendum Act 2015.
The act states that British citizens living abroad, anywhere in the world, for more than 15 years will not be able to vote on whether the country should remain in or leave the EU on 23 June.The act states that British citizens living abroad, anywhere in the world, for more than 15 years will not be able to vote on whether the country should remain in or leave the EU on 23 June.
Mr Shindler and Ms MacLennan argued that the rule illegally denied them the chance to vote, saying it unlawfully restricted their right to freedom of movemet under EU law. Mr Shindler and Ms MacLennan argued that the rule illegally denied them the chance to vote, saying it unlawfully restricted their right to freedom of movement under EU law.
Both have lived outside of the UK for more than 15 years now.Both have lived outside of the UK for more than 15 years now.
But Lord Justice Lloyd Jones ruled that it did not restrict their rights and rejected their application for judicial review.But Lord Justice Lloyd Jones ruled that it did not restrict their rights and rejected their application for judicial review.
Aidan O'Neill QC, who represented Mr Shindler and Ms MacLennan, had told the court that the 15-year rule was arbitrary, at a one-day hearing earlier this month. Aidan O'Neill QC, who represented Mr Shindler and Ms MacLennan, had told the court that the 15-year rule was arbitrary, at a hearing earlier this month.
He said the Government was basing the referendum's franchise on those “with the closest of links to the UK” - but that no one had a greater interest in the outcome of the vote than the two million Britons living outside of the UK elsewhere in Europe.He said the Government was basing the referendum's franchise on those “with the closest of links to the UK” - but that no one had a greater interest in the outcome of the vote than the two million Britons living outside of the UK elsewhere in Europe.
Victory for the 'Leave' campaign could lead to Mr Shindler and Ms MacLennan becoming “resident aliens” in Europe, he added.Victory for the 'Leave' campaign could lead to Mr Shindler and Ms MacLennan becoming “resident aliens” in Europe, he added.
“Without British membership of the EU these two British citizens will no longer be EU citizens.”“Without British membership of the EU these two British citizens will no longer be EU citizens.”
Mr Shindler and Ms MacLennan's lawyers confirmed they will now seek leave to appeal directly to the UK's Supreme Court. Mr Shindler and Ms MacLennan's lawyers confirmed they will now appeal directly to the UK's Supreme Court.
Richard Stein, from law firm Leigh Day, said: “We now intend to take the legal battle to the Supreme Court, the highest court in the country, so that all British citizens living elsewhere in the EU can be part of the democratic process to vote in this referendum, which will have a very real impact on their lives.Richard Stein, from law firm Leigh Day, said: “We now intend to take the legal battle to the Supreme Court, the highest court in the country, so that all British citizens living elsewhere in the EU can be part of the democratic process to vote in this referendum, which will have a very real impact on their lives.
“We believe that there is precedent for fast-track legislation being put through Parliament in a matter of days in response to court judgment, so there would be no need for the referendum to be delayed if the Supreme Court rules in our favour.“We believe that there is precedent for fast-track legislation being put through Parliament in a matter of days in response to court judgment, so there would be no need for the referendum to be delayed if the Supreme Court rules in our favour.
“Since this is a vote in a referendum rather than in an election there is no need to link the votes of Britons in Europe to any particular constituency in the UK.“Since this is a vote in a referendum rather than in an election there is no need to link the votes of Britons in Europe to any particular constituency in the UK.
“Possession of a British passport should be enough.”“Possession of a British passport should be enough.”
Ms MacLennan said: “The Government made a manifesto commitment to enfranchise all British citizens, no matter how long they have been abroad, saying that they thought that 'choosing 15 years, as opposed to 14 or 16 years, is inherently like sticking a dart in a dartboard' and that 'if British citizens maintain British citizenship, that brings with it rights, obligations and a connection with this country, and that that should endure'. Ms MacLennan said: “The Government made a manifesto commitment to enfranchise all British citizens, no matter how long they have been abroad, saying that they thought that 'choosing 15 years, as opposed to 14 or 16 years, is inherently like sticking a dart in a dartboard' and that 'if British citizens maintain British citizenship, that brings with it rights, obligations and a connection with this country, and that that should endure.'
“We just want the Government to keep its promises.”“We just want the Government to keep its promises.”
A Cabinet Office spokeswoman added: “The Government welcomes the ruling of the High Court in this case.A Cabinet Office spokeswoman added: “The Government welcomes the ruling of the High Court in this case.
“The franchise for the EU referendum was debated, considered and agreed by both Houses of Parliament and is enshrined in law.”“The franchise for the EU referendum was debated, considered and agreed by both Houses of Parliament and is enshrined in law.”
British citizens who have lived outside of the UK for 15 years or less can register to vote in the referendum by clicking here.British citizens who have lived outside of the UK for 15 years or less can register to vote in the referendum by clicking here.
Additional reporting by PAAdditional reporting by PA