This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-36159009

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Expats lose referendum vote legal bid EU referendum: Britons abroad lose vote legal bid
(35 minutes later)
Two Britons living abroad have lost a High Court battle over the right to vote in June's EU referendum.Two Britons living abroad have lost a High Court battle over the right to vote in June's EU referendum.
The legal challenge was brought by World War Two veteran Harry Shindler, 94, who lives in Italy, and lawyer and Belgian resident Jacquelyn MacLennan.The legal challenge was brought by World War Two veteran Harry Shindler, 94, who lives in Italy, and lawyer and Belgian resident Jacquelyn MacLennan.
Under law, UK citizens who have lived elsewhere in Europe for more than 15 years are barred from voting.Under law, UK citizens who have lived elsewhere in Europe for more than 15 years are barred from voting.
But the pair argued the in-out vote on EU membership directly affected them and called for a judicial review.But the pair argued the in-out vote on EU membership directly affected them and called for a judicial review.
They asked the two judges to declare that Section 2 of the EU Referendum Act 2015, which established "the 15-year rule", unlawfully restricted their right to freedom of movement under EU law. They asked the two judges to declare that section two of the EU Referendum Act 2015, which established "the 15-year rule", unlawfully restricted their right to freedom of movement under EU law.
But Lord Justice Lloyd Jones, sitting with Mr Justice Blake, ruled section 2 did not restrict their rights and rejected their application for judicial review. But the judges ruled that the section did not restrict their rights and rejected their application for judicial review.
Lawyers representing the pair say they will seek leave to appeal to the Supreme Court against the judgment.
'Arbitrary' cut-off
Earlier this month, the court heard up to two million expats were being denied the right to take part in the referendum.
Mr Shindler - who has lived in Italy since 1982 - and other campaigners argue the 15-year cut-off is arbitrary and that rules governing UK general elections, the basis for the referendum franchise, are not being applied evenly.
His lawyers say the EU Referendum Act extends the right to vote to peers, and to Gibraltar residents who would not normally be able to take part in general elections, but not long-term expats.
The government says the franchise was agreed by both Houses of Parliament.
'Resident aliens'
Aidan O'Neill QC, for the expats, told the court a victory for the "Leave" campaign could lead to Mr Shindler and Ms MacLennan becoming "resident aliens" in Europe.
They would no longer be EU citizens and their right to live, work, own property, and receive health care free at the point of use, could be placed in jeopardy, he said.
James Eadie QC, for the government, argued the 2015 referendum legislation did not interfere with free movement rights and was not open to challenge on EU law grounds.
The impact of a "leave" vote on those caught by the rule could not be predicted and a win for Mr Shindler and Ms MacLennan would make it impossible to hold the referendum on 23 June, as planned, he added.
In their manifesto, the Conservatives pledged to scrap the 15-year rule in elections. The government says it remains committed to doing so, but stress that the plan is not connected to the referendum.
Are you a Briton living outside of the UK but within Europe? What is your reaction to this ruling? Email haveyoursay@bbc.co.uk with your views and experiences.
Please include a contact number if you are willing to speak to a BBC journalist. You can also contact us in the following ways:
Or use the form below