This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/football/2016/apr/27/south-yorkshire-police-chief-suspended-over-hillsborough-verdict

The article has changed 10 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
South Yorkshire police chief suspended over Hillsborough verdict South Yorkshire police chief suspended over Hillsborough verdict
(35 minutes later)
David Crompton has been suspended as chief constable of South Yorkshire police, in the fallout from the Hillsborough inquest unlawful killing verdicts. David Crompton has been suspended as chief constable of South Yorkshire police following the Hillsborough inquest findings.
Crompton’s force had been criticised for its conduct during the inquest which delivered a damning verdict on Tuesday. Crompton’s force had been criticised for its conduct during the inquest, which found that 96 Liverpool fans had been unlawfully killed.
Dr Alan Billings, the police and crime commissioner for South Yorkshire, has the power to take such a decision but his spokesperson would make no further comment. Following the verdicts on Tuesday, Crompton admitted the force got the policing of the match “catastrophically wrong” and “unequivocally” accepted the inquest jury’s conclusions.
The news came hours after Andy Burnham, the shadow home secretary, had described Crompton’s position as “untenable”. Burnham’s comments were made in the House of Commons as MPs discussed the fallout from Tuesday’s inquest verdicts about the 1989 disaster. The news came hours after Andy Burnham, the shadow home secretary, had described Crompton’s position as untenable. Burnham’s comments were made in the House of Commons as MPs discussed the fallout from Tuesday’s inquest verdicts about the 1989 disaster.
South Yorkshire’s police and crime commissioner Dr Alan Billings said he had been left with no choice other than to suspend Crompton with immediate effect following the run-up to and delivery of the Hillsborough verdicts. South Yorkshire’s police and crime commissioner, Dr Alan Billings, said he had been left with no choice other than to suspend Crompton with immediate effect.
Billings said he acted “based on the erosion of public trust and confidence”, adding “I suspended him with immediate effect and he left the building.” Billings said : “I have reached this decision with a heavy heart following discussions with David both in the run-up to and following the delivery of the Hillsborough verdicts.
“My decision is based on the erosion of public trust and confidence referenced in statements and comments in the House of Commons this lunchtime, along with public calls for the chief constable’s resignation from a number of quarters.”
Related: Hillsborough verdict: victims' families' 27-year struggle for truth vindicated
He said he acted because of the “difference of perception” between the chief constable and Hillsborough families about questions the force’s lawyers had raised about the conduct of fans on the day of the tragedy in 1989.He said he acted because of the “difference of perception” between the chief constable and Hillsborough families about questions the force’s lawyers had raised about the conduct of fans on the day of the tragedy in 1989.
Billings said the row was “proving an obstacle to our going forward” and came despite Crompton being due to retire in November.Billings said the row was “proving an obstacle to our going forward” and came despite Crompton being due to retire in November.
The announcement of the suspension came barely four hours after concerns were raised in the Commons about the force’s conduct at the inquest.The announcement of the suspension came barely four hours after concerns were raised in the Commons about the force’s conduct at the inquest.
Burnham, launched a blistering attack on the force’s leadership and conduct at the inquest.
Burnham’s speech was greeted with applause by the Labour benches, and seemed to catch the national mood in the wake of the verdicts.
He and the families were angered by the police lawyers at the inquest, acting on instruction from the force. Burnham said: “The much bigger question for the South Yorkshire police to answer today is this: why, at this inquest, did they go back on their 2012 public apology?”
Burnham added: “Shamefully, the cover-up continued in this Warrington court room.
“Millions of pounds of public money were spent re-telling discredited lies.”
By doing so, the Commons heard, even more agony was piled on the families’ suffering of almost three decades.
Burnham told MPs: “If the police had chosen to maintain its apology, this inquest would have been much shorter. But they didn’t and they put the families through hell once again.”
“This force hasn’t learned and hasn’t changed. But I do blame their leadership and culture, which seems rotten to the core.”
“So will the home secretary now order the fundamental reform of this force and consider all potential options?”
Just after midday on Wednesday South Yorkshire police issued a fresh statement to try to head off already fierce criticism of its conduct at the inquest.
In it it said sorry for “perceived” differences between an apology it had issued in 2012, and conduct at the inquest.
In Wednesday’s statement, South Yorkshire police said: “We have never sought, at any stage, to defend the failures of SYP or its officers. Nevertheless, these failures had to be put into the context of other contributory factors. In other words, where do the failings of SYP stand in the overall picture?
“We are sorry if our approach has been perceived as at odds with our earlier apology, this was certainly not our intention.”