This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/football/2016/apr/26/hillsborough-families-call-for-south-yorkshire-police-chief-david-crompton-to-quit

The article has changed 9 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Hillsborough families call for South Yorkshire police chief to quit Hillsborough families call for South Yorkshire police chief to quit
(35 minutes later)
The families of the 96 people who died at Hillsborough have called on the chief constable of South Yorkshire police to resign immediately, and accused the force of seeking to subvert and mislead the inquests into their deaths.The families of the 96 people who died at Hillsborough have called on the chief constable of South Yorkshire police to resign immediately, and accused the force of seeking to subvert and mislead the inquests into their deaths.
Stephen Wright, whose brother Graham was among those who died on 15 April 1989, has criticised the force for failing to accept its wrongdoing earlier. He has called for its chief, David Crompton, to step down. Stephen Wright, whose brother Graham was among those who died on 15 April 1989, has criticised the force for failing to accept its wrongdoing earlier. He called for its chief, David Crompton, to step down in the wake of the verdicts, which excoriated police and vindicated the families’ campaign.
Anne Burkett, whose son Peter was also killed, talked about what she called the “industrial-strength cover-up” by police of what really happened. “Now is the time for consequences,” she said, also calling for Crompton to go, and for wider remedial measures to be taken against the force.Anne Burkett, whose son Peter was also killed, talked about what she called the “industrial-strength cover-up” by police of what really happened. “Now is the time for consequences,” she said, also calling for Crompton to go, and for wider remedial measures to be taken against the force.
After an inquest that lasted two years, the longest in British legal history, the Hillsborough jury found that the 96 victims of the 1989 disaster were unlawfully killed. They exonerated Liverpool fans of blame, and they listed a catalogue of failings by the police and ambulance services that contributed to the deaths.
It can now also be reported that the solicitor for 22 of the families, Elkan Abrahamson, told the Home Office on 16 March that he would call for Crompton to resign at the end of the inquests.It can now also be reported that the solicitor for 22 of the families, Elkan Abrahamson, told the Home Office on 16 March that he would call for Crompton to resign at the end of the inquests.
A week later, on 23 March, the chief constable announced that he would retire when his contract ends in November. Crompton has previously told the Guardian his decision was not related to criticism of how the force conducted the Hillsborough inquests, or Abrahamson’s call for him to resign.A week later, on 23 March, the chief constable announced that he would retire when his contract ends in November. Crompton has previously told the Guardian his decision was not related to criticism of how the force conducted the Hillsborough inquests, or Abrahamson’s call for him to resign.
On Tuesday, the police chief read out a statement of apology – in which he said the force unequivocally accepted the verdict – but made no direct reference to his own position, “On 15 April 1989, South Yorkshire police got the policing of the FA Cup semi-final at Hillsborough catastrophically wrong,” said Crompton. “It was and still is the biggest disaster in British sporting history. That day, 96 people died and the lives of many others were changed forever. The force failed the victims and failed their families.On Tuesday, the police chief read out a statement of apology – in which he said the force unequivocally accepted the verdict – but made no direct reference to his own position, “On 15 April 1989, South Yorkshire police got the policing of the FA Cup semi-final at Hillsborough catastrophically wrong,” said Crompton. “It was and still is the biggest disaster in British sporting history. That day, 96 people died and the lives of many others were changed forever. The force failed the victims and failed their families.
“Today, as I have said before, I want to apologise unreservedly to the families and all those affected.”“Today, as I have said before, I want to apologise unreservedly to the families and all those affected.”
During the long-running inquest, family members regularly became unhappy about the way the police force responded. During the long-running inquest, family members regularly took issue with the way the police force responded.
A statement released by lawyers for the families on Tuesday said: “It is therefore all the more shameful that, rather than focusing on the search for truth and despite having made public apologies, the approach to the inquests taken by South Yorkshire police and the Yorkshire ambulance service was to fight tooth and nail to avoid adverse findings by the jury. This turned the inquests into an adversarial battle that probably doubled the length of time it might otherwise have [taken].”A statement released by lawyers for the families on Tuesday said: “It is therefore all the more shameful that, rather than focusing on the search for truth and despite having made public apologies, the approach to the inquests taken by South Yorkshire police and the Yorkshire ambulance service was to fight tooth and nail to avoid adverse findings by the jury. This turned the inquests into an adversarial battle that probably doubled the length of time it might otherwise have [taken].”
In legal submissions in 2014 which can now be reported, the families objected to questioning by Fiona Barton QC, representing South Yorkshire police, which they believed was seeking to avoid responsibility. They argued that the jury should be informed of Crompton’s full 2012 apology and the force’s previous admissions of negligence for causing the disaster. In legal submissions in 2014 that can now be reported, the families objected to questioning by Fiona Barton QC, representing South Yorkshire police, which they believed was seeking to avoid responsibility. They argued that the jury should be informed of Crompton’s full 2012 apology and the force’s previous admissions of negligence for causing the disaster.
Crompton said in September 2012, after the report by the Hillsborough Independent Panel, that South Yorkshire police had failed the victims and families at Hillsborough, lost control and that afterwards senior officers had sought to change the narrative of what happened. “Disgraceful lies were told which blamed the Liverpool fans for the disaster,” Crompton said then, in an apology that remained on the force’s website throughout the inquests, until it was taken down earlier this year.Crompton said in September 2012, after the report by the Hillsborough Independent Panel, that South Yorkshire police had failed the victims and families at Hillsborough, lost control and that afterwards senior officers had sought to change the narrative of what happened. “Disgraceful lies were told which blamed the Liverpool fans for the disaster,” Crompton said then, in an apology that remained on the force’s website throughout the inquests, until it was taken down earlier this year.
Barton said in court that Crompton had not given her instructions to “put a positive case” but to “extract facts” from witnesses. She objected to the 2012 apology or previous admissions of negligence being included, arguing that the inquests were new legal proceedings involving the jury hearing evidence for the first time.Barton said in court that Crompton had not given her instructions to “put a positive case” but to “extract facts” from witnesses. She objected to the 2012 apology or previous admissions of negligence being included, arguing that the inquests were new legal proceedings involving the jury hearing evidence for the first time.
The coroner, Sir John Goldring, accepted that position. Earlier this month, the families’ lawyers asked him to write a formal “prevent future deaths” report to Theresa May, the home secretary, arguing that South Yorkshire police’s conduct of the inquests showed the force had not learned the necessary lessons since 1989. The families’ lawyers also called on Goldring to write a similar report to the health secretary, Jeremy Hunt, arguing that the chief executive of Yorkshire ambulance service did not stand by previous acceptances of responsibility for failures made in the response to the crush at Hillsborough, including shortcomings accepted in 2012.The coroner, Sir John Goldring, accepted that position. Earlier this month, the families’ lawyers asked him to write a formal “prevent future deaths” report to Theresa May, the home secretary, arguing that South Yorkshire police’s conduct of the inquests showed the force had not learned the necessary lessons since 1989. The families’ lawyers also called on Goldring to write a similar report to the health secretary, Jeremy Hunt, arguing that the chief executive of Yorkshire ambulance service did not stand by previous acceptances of responsibility for failures made in the response to the crush at Hillsborough, including shortcomings accepted in 2012.
Pete Weatherby QC, representing 22 families whose relatives died in the disaster, argued that the two organisations unnecessarily prolonged the inquests and the suffering of the families. He said: “Despite their public stance, both [South Yorkshire police and Yorkshire ambulance service] have sought to minimise their responsibility through their conduct in these inquests, to the extent that the jury is unaware of any acceptance of responsibility or fault. This institutional defensiveness risks subverting the process.”Pete Weatherby QC, representing 22 families whose relatives died in the disaster, argued that the two organisations unnecessarily prolonged the inquests and the suffering of the families. He said: “Despite their public stance, both [South Yorkshire police and Yorkshire ambulance service] have sought to minimise their responsibility through their conduct in these inquests, to the extent that the jury is unaware of any acceptance of responsibility or fault. This institutional defensiveness risks subverting the process.”
Weatherby produced a detailed list of examples in which he said Barton was seeking to emphasise alleged misbehaviour by supporters, including allegations of people spitting and not responding to police instructions. He accused the ambulance service of seeking to avoid criticism of its response to the emergency “in the face of overwhelming expert evidence to the contrary” and of seeking to argue that a prompter response would not have made a difference because all the 96 people who died were beyond recovery at an early stage.Weatherby produced a detailed list of examples in which he said Barton was seeking to emphasise alleged misbehaviour by supporters, including allegations of people spitting and not responding to police instructions. He accused the ambulance service of seeking to avoid criticism of its response to the emergency “in the face of overwhelming expert evidence to the contrary” and of seeking to argue that a prompter response would not have made a difference because all the 96 people who died were beyond recovery at an early stage.
Both Barton and Jenni Richards QC, representing the ambulance service, argued that Goldring should not send such reports. Barton argued it was not relevant to preventing future deaths, as the safety at football grounds had hugely improved following Taylor’s recommendations after the 1989 disaster. Yorkshire ambulance service rejected Weatherby’s criticisms and argued that it conducted the inquests “to make sure that all relevant evidence about the emergency service response on the day and the subsequent evidence gathering process is before the court”.Both Barton and Jenni Richards QC, representing the ambulance service, argued that Goldring should not send such reports. Barton argued it was not relevant to preventing future deaths, as the safety at football grounds had hugely improved following Taylor’s recommendations after the 1989 disaster. Yorkshire ambulance service rejected Weatherby’s criticisms and argued that it conducted the inquests “to make sure that all relevant evidence about the emergency service response on the day and the subsequent evidence gathering process is before the court”.
Goldring ruled earlier this month that he would not write such “prevent future deaths” reports, deciding that however South Yorkshire police and the ambulance service had conducted the inquests, it did not mean safety lessons had not been learned.Goldring ruled earlier this month that he would not write such “prevent future deaths” reports, deciding that however South Yorkshire police and the ambulance service had conducted the inquests, it did not mean safety lessons had not been learned.