This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/27/world/asia/indonesia-1965-massacre-graves.html

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Indonesia Begins Gathering Data on Anti-Communist Atrocities Indonesia Moves to Investigate Anti-Communist Atrocities
(35 minutes later)
JAKARTA, Indonesia — Indonesia’s government has taken tentative steps toward investigating one of the country’s darkest periods, the bloody anti-Communist purges of the mid-1960s, with President Joko Widodo ordering officials to collect data from human rights researchers on the scale and scope of the atrocities. JAKARTA, Indonesia — Indonesia’s president instructed his government to investigate one of the country’s darkest periods, the bloody anti-Communist purges of the mid-1960s, perhaps ending decades of official reluctance to confront the military’s killings of hundreds of thousands of people.
One of Mr. Joko’s most senior ministers, Luhut B. Pandjaitan, said at a news conference Monday night that the president had told him to begin gathering the information, specifically about mass graves from the killings that are said to be scattered across the Indonesian archipelago. Haris Azhar, the head of an Indonesian research organization, said on Tuesday that the government had begun contacting his group and others about the data. One of President Joko Widodo’s most senior ministers, Luhut B. Pandjaitan, said at a news conference Monday night that the president had told him to begin gathering information about mass graves that are said to be scattered across the Indonesian archipelago. Haris Azhar, the head of an Indonesian research organization, said on Tuesday that the government had begun contacting his group and others about the data.
But it was far from clear that the development signaled an end to decades of official reluctance to investigate the purges of 1965-66, in which hundreds of thousands of people are believed to have been killed. In the decades since, the killings have remained an extremely delicate issue for senior government officials, many of whom were former generals. The purges of 1965-66, in which hundreds of thousands of people are believed to have been killed by the Indonesian military and others, have remained an extremely delicate issue for senior government officials, many of whom were generals.
Mr. Luhut, a retired general who is now the coordinating minister for political, legal and security affairs, appeared to cast doubt on the need for an investigation in his remarks on Monday night. “The president asked me to find them, if there are any,” he said, referring to mass graves. Mr. Luhut, a retired general who is now the coordinating minister for political, legal and security affairs, appeared to cast doubt on the need for an investigation into the mass graves in his remarks on Monday night. “The president asked me to find them, if there are any,” he said.
“During these decades we have always been told several hundred thousand people died, yet, until today, we have not found one mass grave,” Mr. Luhut told reporters at the presidential palace in Jakarta, the capital. Human rights organizations say there is clear evidence of such graves.“During these decades we have always been told several hundred thousand people died, yet, until today, we have not found one mass grave,” Mr. Luhut told reporters at the presidential palace in Jakarta, the capital. Human rights organizations say there is clear evidence of such graves.
The purges followed a failed uprising within the Indonesian military in September 1965, as the Cold War was escalating in Southeast Asia. Top commanders called it an attempted coup orchestrated by the then-powerful Indonesian Communist Party, working with rogue military personnel. The purges followed a failed uprising by members of the Indonesian military in September 1965, as the Cold War was escalating in Southeast Asia. Top commanders called it an attempted coup orchestrated by the then-powerful Indonesian Communist Party, working with rogue military personnel.
The killings that ensued were carried out by soldiers and military-backed civilian, paramilitary and religious groups. Half a million people or more are estimated to have been killed, and hundreds of thousands of others were held in detention for years. The victims included intellectuals, ethnic Chinese Indonesians and countless others, many of whom had no connection to Communism.The killings that ensued were carried out by soldiers and military-backed civilian, paramilitary and religious groups. Half a million people or more are estimated to have been killed, and hundreds of thousands of others were held in detention for years. The victims included intellectuals, ethnic Chinese Indonesians and countless others, many of whom had no connection to Communism.
Mr. Haris, the coordinator of the nongovernmental organization Commission for Missing Persons and Victims of Violence, said his organization alone had collected evidence of at least 16 mass graves containing as many as 40 bodies each, mostly on the main Indonesian island of Java but also on Bali and Sulawesi. “We have calculated how big the graves are, the numbers of bodies and the probable names of the victims as well as how they were killed,” he said. Mr. Azhar, the coordinator of the nongovernmental organization Commission for Missing Persons and Victims of Violence, said his organization alone had collected evidence of at least 16 mass graves containing as many as 40 bodies each, mostly on the main Indonesian island of Java, but also on Bali and Sulawesi. “We have calculated how big the graves are, the numbers of bodies and the probable names of the victims as well as how they were killed,” he said.
Last week, the government supported a symposium in Jakarta on the purges, the first time that a public discussion of the atrocities had received official endorsement. Some hoped it would be a first step toward an official reckoning with the killings, but others worried that the government would use the forum as an excuse to consider the subject closed.Last week, the government supported a symposium in Jakarta on the purges, the first time that a public discussion of the atrocities had received official endorsement. Some hoped it would be a first step toward an official reckoning with the killings, but others worried that the government would use the forum as an excuse to consider the subject closed.
Mr. Haris said the government had begun canvassing groups like his for their research on the period. But it was not clear what would be done with the information, he said.Mr. Haris said the government had begun canvassing groups like his for their research on the period. But it was not clear what would be done with the information, he said.
“This is the issue,” Mr. Haris said. “How will the data be used?”“This is the issue,” Mr. Haris said. “How will the data be used?”
Another crucial issue still unresolved, Mr. Haris said, is whether people who come forward will be protected from potential reprisals. Many of the military, political and religious groups implicated in the killings remain at the core of Indonesia’s political elite. Another crucial issue still unresolved, Mr. Haris said, is whether people who come forward will be protected from potential reprisals. Many of the military, political and religious groups implicated in the killings are part of Indonesia’s political elite.
While Indonesia has made progress in coming to terms with its past during its transition to democracy, many gains have proved fleeting. Mr. Joko’s rise to the presidency in 2014 — he is Indonesia’s first president from outside the country’s traditional political elite or the military — raised hopes among many Indonesians that longstanding human rights issues, such as the silence over the purges, would be addressed.While Indonesia has made progress in coming to terms with its past during its transition to democracy, many gains have proved fleeting. Mr. Joko’s rise to the presidency in 2014 — he is Indonesia’s first president from outside the country’s traditional political elite or the military — raised hopes among many Indonesians that longstanding human rights issues, such as the silence over the purges, would be addressed.
Just months after assuming office, for instance, Mr. Joko visited the restive province of Papua, freeing political prisoners there and lifting a ban on visits by foreign journalists. But the military has all but reinstated the ban on travel by journalists to Papua.Just months after assuming office, for instance, Mr. Joko visited the restive province of Papua, freeing political prisoners there and lifting a ban on visits by foreign journalists. But the military has all but reinstated the ban on travel by journalists to Papua.
And Mr. Joko’s government has not followed up on a 2012 report by the country’s independent National Commission on Human Rights calling for criminal investigations into the 1965-66 purges. At the symposium last week, Mr. Luhut ruled out a criminal investigation of the killings. And Mr. Joko’s government has not followed up on a 2012 report by the country’s independent National Commission on Human Rights calling for criminal investigations into the purges. At the symposium last week, Mr. Luhut ruled out a criminal investigation of the killings.
“I try to be optimistic,” Mr. Haris said. “So many efforts have been ignored by the government before. I have to be careful.”“I try to be optimistic,” Mr. Haris said. “So many efforts have been ignored by the government before. I have to be careful.”