This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/apr/26/mps-voting-against-the-child-refugee-amendment-immigration

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
How do you feel about MPs voting against the child refugee amendment? How do you feel about MPs voting against the child refugee amendment?
(35 minutes later)
MPs have rejected an amendment to the immigration bill, which compelled the government to offer sanctuary in the UK to 3,000 unaccompanied child refugees from Europe.MPs have rejected an amendment to the immigration bill, which compelled the government to offer sanctuary in the UK to 3,000 unaccompanied child refugees from Europe.
The move follows a Commons debate on Monday where cries of “shame” erupted following the vote, which saw the immigration bill rebuffed by 18 votes (294 to 276). Those against the move argued that offering sanctuary to lone children who had already reached Europe may mean more youngsters become subject to trafficking. However, this was dubbed as a “bogus” suggestion by Lib Dem leader Tim Farron.The move follows a Commons debate on Monday where cries of “shame” erupted following the vote, which saw the immigration bill rebuffed by 18 votes (294 to 276). Those against the move argued that offering sanctuary to lone children who had already reached Europe may mean more youngsters become subject to trafficking. However, this was dubbed as a “bogus” suggestion by Lib Dem leader Tim Farron.
Related: Labour says 'fight will go on' after Tories vote down child refugee plan Related: Were you a Kindertransport child?
Speaking about the bill before it was voted on Rowan Williams, the former archbishop of Canterbury, and chair of Christian Aid argued in The Guardian that the the UK had to take a lead in protecting unaccompanied minors in Europe. “Independent medical assessments have found that nearly half of all unaccompanied minors carry a sexually transmitted disease, testament to the terrible dangers they face along the way to Europe. Some will have died. In the past three months, two minors have died trying to reach their family members in the UK from Calais,” he wrote.Speaking about the bill before it was voted on Rowan Williams, the former archbishop of Canterbury, and chair of Christian Aid argued in The Guardian that the the UK had to take a lead in protecting unaccompanied minors in Europe. “Independent medical assessments have found that nearly half of all unaccompanied minors carry a sexually transmitted disease, testament to the terrible dangers they face along the way to Europe. Some will have died. In the past three months, two minors have died trying to reach their family members in the UK from Calais,” he wrote.
How do you feel about the decision? Do you know people directly affected? Do you want to send a message to MPs?How do you feel about the decision? Do you know people directly affected? Do you want to send a message to MPs?
Share your views and stories by filling in the form below.Share your views and stories by filling in the form below.