This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-36134837

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Minister defends government's stance on child refugees Government avoids defeat over lone child refugees call
(35 minutes later)
Allowing thousands of child refugees into the UK from Europe could mean more children fall into the hands of traffickers, the government has said. MPs have voted against an attempt to force the government to allow 3,000 unaccompanied child refugees into the UK from Europe.
MPs are debating a Lords amendment that would allow 3,000 children into the UK. The Labour amendment to the Immigration Bill was rejected by 294 to 276.
Attempting to head off a Commons rebellion, Home Office Minister James Brokenshire said the move could encourage other families to "send their children ahead" towards Europe. Ministers argued that offering sanctuary to lone children who have already reached Europe could mean more fall into the hands of traffickers.
Mr Brokenshire's argument was dismissed by Lib Dem Tim Farron as "bogus". This was dismissed by Lib Dem leader Tim Farron as "bogus" while some Tory MPs also backed the amendment.
The government announced last week it would take in as many as 3,000 refugees, mostly vulnerable children, from the war-torn Syria region by 2020. Following the vote, Labour peers said they would propose an alternative amendment in the Lords on Tuesday. If they are successful, the matter could return to the Commons.
'Exceptional measures''Exceptional measures'
The government announced last week it would take in as many as 3,000 refugees, mostly vulnerable children, from the war-torn Syria region by 2020.
But campaigners, including charity Save the Children, are calling for 3,000 unaccompanied children who have already made it into Europe to be allowed into the UK.But campaigners, including charity Save the Children, are calling for 3,000 unaccompanied children who have already made it into Europe to be allowed into the UK.
The amendment to the Immigration Bill, tabled by Labour's Lord Dubs, is backed by Labour, the Lib Dems and the SNP. The amendment to the Immigration Bill, tabled by Labour's Lord Dubs, was backed by Labour, the Lib Dems and the SNP.
Lending his support, Conservative backbencher Stephen Phillips said "exceptional times call for exceptional measures", urging colleagues to back the amendment.Lending his support, Conservative backbencher Stephen Phillips said "exceptional times call for exceptional measures", urging colleagues to back the amendment.
Responding to Mr Brokenshire's argument, he said: "These children are already in Europe. They are alone, far from their families, they are cold, frightened, hungry, frequently without help or access to those who might help or protect them."Responding to Mr Brokenshire's argument, he said: "These children are already in Europe. They are alone, far from their families, they are cold, frightened, hungry, frequently without help or access to those who might help or protect them."
Labour's refugee taskforce chairwoman, Yvette Cooper, suggested the government was leaving the problem to other countries like Greece which could not take the strain, while shadow Home Office minister Keir Starmer said the argument that admitting the children would create a "pull factor" for more refugees was "flimsy".Labour's refugee taskforce chairwoman, Yvette Cooper, suggested the government was leaving the problem to other countries like Greece which could not take the strain, while shadow Home Office minister Keir Starmer said the argument that admitting the children would create a "pull factor" for more refugees was "flimsy".
But Conservative Sir Edward Leigh said the government's position was "fair" because it was better to help children in danger in Syria rather than those who have made it to Europe.But Conservative Sir Edward Leigh said the government's position was "fair" because it was better to help children in danger in Syria rather than those who have made it to Europe.
'Head and heart''Head and heart'
Mr Brokenshire told MPs the government "wholeheartedly shares" the desire of the Lords to protect unaccompanied children.Mr Brokenshire told MPs the government "wholeheartedly shares" the desire of the Lords to protect unaccompanied children.
But he said the challenge was in balancing "head and heart" and expressed concern that the Lords amendment could put more children at risk with families choosing to send them abroad alone, in the hands of traffickers.But he said the challenge was in balancing "head and heart" and expressed concern that the Lords amendment could put more children at risk with families choosing to send them abroad alone, in the hands of traffickers.
The minister said: "Our starting principle is that we must put the best interests of children first and avoid any policy that places children at additional risk or encourages them to place their lives in the hands of people traffickers and criminal gangs.The minister said: "Our starting principle is that we must put the best interests of children first and avoid any policy that places children at additional risk or encourages them to place their lives in the hands of people traffickers and criminal gangs.
"In any response we need to be careful not to inadvertently create a situation in which families see an advantage in sending children ahead, alone and in the hands of traffickers, putting their lives at risk by attempting treacherous sea crossings to Europe.""In any response we need to be careful not to inadvertently create a situation in which families see an advantage in sending children ahead, alone and in the hands of traffickers, putting their lives at risk by attempting treacherous sea crossings to Europe."
Europe should, "in essence", be a "safe space", he said.Europe should, "in essence", be a "safe space", he said.