This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk_politics/7336360.stm

The article has changed 8 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Immigration rule change 'illegal' Immigration rule change 'illegal'
(10 minutes later)
The government acted unlawfully in changing immigration rules for highly skilled workers who want to stay in the UK, the High Court has ruled.The government acted unlawfully in changing immigration rules for highly skilled workers who want to stay in the UK, the High Court has ruled.
In 2006, a new "points" system, based on education, previous salary and age, was introduced, changing the criteria for remaining in the country.In 2006, a new "points" system, based on education, previous salary and age, was introduced, changing the criteria for remaining in the country.
Opponents say this means 44,000 people in the UK under old rules must leave.Opponents say this means 44,000 people in the UK under old rules must leave.
Judge Sir George Newman ruled that the original scheme should be honoured. The government says it wants to appeal.Judge Sir George Newman ruled that the original scheme should be honoured. The government says it wants to appeal.
How points-based system worksHow points-based system works
Under the Highly Skilled Migrants Programme, introduced in 2002, non-EU workers such as doctors, engineers and financiers were originally given UK entry for a year.Under the Highly Skilled Migrants Programme, introduced in 2002, non-EU workers such as doctors, engineers and financiers were originally given UK entry for a year.
They could apply for a two-year extension, then a further three years before applying for settlement.They could apply for a two-year extension, then a further three years before applying for settlement.
This was judged according to qualifications, experience and earning ability.This was judged according to qualifications, experience and earning ability.
But in November 2006, the home secretary changed the rules, so anyone applying to extend their work visa would have to score points based on their education, salary and age.But in November 2006, the home secretary changed the rules, so anyone applying to extend their work visa would have to score points based on their education, salary and age.
The Highly Skilled Migrants Programme Forum group brought the case against the government, arguing the new system was "grossly unfair" and "a clear case of breach of legitimate expectation".The Highly Skilled Migrants Programme Forum group brought the case against the government, arguing the new system was "grossly unfair" and "a clear case of breach of legitimate expectation".
The group claims 90% of those who arrived before 2006, about 44,000 people, would no longer qualify to remain in the UK and accused the government of going back on a promise to let them stay after several years' work.The group claims 90% of those who arrived before 2006, about 44,000 people, would no longer qualify to remain in the UK and accused the government of going back on a promise to let them stay after several years' work.
But the government says regulating the number of immigrants to the UK is in the country's interest.But the government says regulating the number of immigrants to the UK is in the country's interest.

Are you affected by this court ruling? Send us your comments and experiences by filling out the form below.
Name