This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/apr/08/gay-slur-against-hairdresser-france-paris-not-homophobic-court-rules
The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 2 | Version 3 |
|---|---|
| Slur against gay hairdresser not homophobic, French court rules | Slur against gay hairdresser not homophobic, French court rules |
| (5 months later) | |
| The French minister of labour, Myriam El Khomri, has denounced as “scandalous” a Paris court ruling that it was not homophobic for a hair salon boss to call an employee a “PD” – a common but offensive term for gay men – because many hairdressers are gay. | The French minister of labour, Myriam El Khomri, has denounced as “scandalous” a Paris court ruling that it was not homophobic for a hair salon boss to call an employee a “PD” – a common but offensive term for gay men – because many hairdressers are gay. |
| The incident occurred in 2014, during a young hairdresser’s two-month trial at a Paris hair salon. He called in sick one day and his boss accidentally sent him a text message intended for someone else. In it, she said: “I’m not keeping him. I’ll let him know tomorrow ... I don’t have a good feeling about this guy. He’s a ‘PD’.” The next day she sacked him. | The incident occurred in 2014, during a young hairdresser’s two-month trial at a Paris hair salon. He called in sick one day and his boss accidentally sent him a text message intended for someone else. In it, she said: “I’m not keeping him. I’ll let him know tomorrow ... I don’t have a good feeling about this guy. He’s a ‘PD’.” The next day she sacked him. |
| The hairdresser went to an employment tribunal to complain that he had been sacked because of his sexuality. His case was backed by France’s national citizens’ rights watchdog. The verdict, returned late last year, was that the salon owner had not discriminated against the hairdresser on grounds of his sexual orientation. | The hairdresser went to an employment tribunal to complain that he had been sacked because of his sexuality. His case was backed by France’s national citizens’ rights watchdog. The verdict, returned late last year, was that the salon owner had not discriminated against the hairdresser on grounds of his sexual orientation. |
| The ruling stated: “If we put it in the context of the field of hairdressing, the council considers the term ‘PD’ used by the manager can’t be considered a homophobic statement, because it is recognised that hair salons regularly employ homosexual people, namely in women’s salons, without it ever being a problem. | The ruling stated: “If we put it in the context of the field of hairdressing, the council considers the term ‘PD’ used by the manager can’t be considered a homophobic statement, because it is recognised that hair salons regularly employ homosexual people, namely in women’s salons, without it ever being a problem. |
| “The employer has not shown discrimination ... but injurious comments were made.” The hairdresser was awarded damages of €5,000 (£4,042). | “The employer has not shown discrimination ... but injurious comments were made.” The hairdresser was awarded damages of €5,000 (£4,042). |
| France’s citizens’ rights watchdog insisted that the complaint of discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation should have been upheld and has backed an appeal. The organisation discussed the case with equal rights groups this week, prompting a flood of criticism of the judgment on social media. | France’s citizens’ rights watchdog insisted that the complaint of discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation should have been upheld and has backed an appeal. The organisation discussed the case with equal rights groups this week, prompting a flood of criticism of the judgment on social media. |
| The watchdog’s Slimane Laoufi told Agence France-Presse he didn’t understand how a decision by the justice system could be based on “prejudice and stereotypes”. | The watchdog’s Slimane Laoufi told Agence France-Presse he didn’t understand how a decision by the justice system could be based on “prejudice and stereotypes”. |
| El Khomri told RTL radio she was shocked by the judgment. | El Khomri told RTL radio she was shocked by the judgment. |