This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/02/world/asia/kolkata-collapse-india-overpass.html
The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 2 | Version 3 |
---|---|
Construction Firm Accused in India Overpass Collapse | |
(about 5 hours later) | |
NEW DELHI — The police in Kolkata, India, on Friday filed a criminal complaint of culpable homicide and criminal breach of trust against the company that was building an elevated highway that collapsed on Thursday, and then detained eight executives of the firm. | |
As rescue workers continued to sift through the rubble, the company, IVRCL, came under intense scrutiny, with reports that it had run into problems in at least two states and a publicly owned company under the Indian Ministry of Railways. | |
At least 23 people were killed in the accident in the crowded Ganesh Talkies area of Kolkata, formerly Calcutta, and 85 people were injured, the police said. Five hundred people in various rescue capacities were still working at the site Friday night, said a Kolkata police sergeant, S. Satgava, adding, “We cannot tell how many more are trapped.” One person was rescued Friday evening, he said. | |
Television footage from the scene of the collapse showed cranes lifting steel plates, bulldozers clearing concrete rubble and workers cutting metal slabs into smaller pieces to lift them out of the wreckage. Part of the highway was twisted and hanging down, said Sandeep Channan, an official with the National Disaster Response Force, and engineers were working to stabilize it. | |
IVRCL is a major construction firm carrying out irrigation, road, mining and power projects across India, as well as in Sri Lanka, the Middle East and Africa. At a news conference on Friday in Hyderabad, where the company is based, officials said they were shocked by the episode but refused to comment on the police complaint, saying they had not seen it. | |
K. Panduranga Rao, the group head of human resources and administration at IVRCL, said in a telephone interview that he was not the appropriate person to comment on punitive actions taken against his company, but also refused to refer questions to anyone else. | |
There were numerous questions about the company, and no shortage of critics. Derek O’Brien, a spokesman for the state of West Bengal, which includes Kolkata, said the company had been barred from doing business in the state of Uttar Pradesh. He said the police had detained six company officials in Kolkata and two in Hyderabad for questioning. | |
“The company has a bad reputation,” he told the news agency ANI. “The law will take its own course. No one will be spared.” | |
Satish Agnihotri, the chairman and managing director of Rail Vikas Nigam Limited, the publicly owned company under the Railways Ministry, called IVRCL “a major defaulter.” In a telephone interview, he said his company had terminated its contracts with IVRCL over the past three years because of poor performance. | |
“They were working with us, with our company, and because of their lack of performance, or because of their poor performance, we terminated their contracts,” he said. | |
IVRCL would be forbidden to bid on any further contracts for two years after the last termination, he added. Mr. Aghnihotri said his company had also cashed in performance guarantees for several of IVRCL’s projects, although he could not recall the penalty amounts. | |
Chandreshwar Prasad Singh, the minister of urban development, housing and transportation in the state of Jharkhand, said in an interview that his state had blacklisted IVRCL in February because of delays in finishing projects that included laying pipelines for drinking water and putting up electrical wires in eight rural districts. | |
“Such companies need to know that it is a question both of quality and quantity,” said Mr. Singh, who in February took to the floor of the state assembly to accuse the company of cheating the government. They need to know that projects “must be finished in a time-bound manner,” he added. “IVRCL failed on all accounts.” | |
“What happens, or should happen with blacklisting, is that other states sit up and take note of the company’s image and do not award any future projects as well,” Mr. Singh said. | |
But that seems not to have happened, probably because government contracts are awarded to the lowest bidder once basic technical criteria have been met, finance experts said. | |
They said the infrastructure industry in India was under stress, and that among its biggest weakness was in the management of complex construction projects, like the elevated highway that collapsed in Kolkata. | |
West Bengal’s chief minister, Mamata Banerjee, told The Press Trust of India, a news agency, that IVRCL had been awarded the contract for the highway in 2009, under a previous administration. | |
Bureaucratic and other delays hampered the project from the start. The company said on its website that the project was among its toughest, cutting through a crowded neighborhood and requiring heavy machinery. Construction time was limited to six hours a day. | Bureaucratic and other delays hampered the project from the start. The company said on its website that the project was among its toughest, cutting through a crowded neighborhood and requiring heavy machinery. Construction time was limited to six hours a day. |
The company had been struggling with debt. After a restructuring plan fell apart early this year, banks that were its largest debtors converted their debt into equity, taking control of the company, The Press Trust of India reported. | |
Under Indian law, banks can hold the equity for 18 months while they seek offers for it. | Under Indian law, banks can hold the equity for 18 months while they seek offers for it. |