This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/mar/03/bobbi-kristina-brown-autopsy-report-atlanta-judge-unseal
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 1 | Version 2 |
---|---|
Atlanta judge grants request to unseal Bobbi Kristina Brown's autopsy report | Atlanta judge grants request to unseal Bobbi Kristina Brown's autopsy report |
(6 months later) | |
A judge in Atlanta has granted a news media request to unseal the autopsy report for Bobbi Kristina Brown. | A judge in Atlanta has granted a news media request to unseal the autopsy report for Bobbi Kristina Brown. |
The 22-year-old daughter of singer Whitney Houston was found face-down and unresponsive in a bathtub in her suburban Atlanta town home on 31 January 2015, and died in hospice care on 26 July. | The 22-year-old daughter of singer Whitney Houston was found face-down and unresponsive in a bathtub in her suburban Atlanta town home on 31 January 2015, and died in hospice care on 26 July. |
Local news media reported that Fulton County superior court judge Henry Newkirk on Thursday granted a motion filed by media organizations. | Local news media reported that Fulton County superior court judge Henry Newkirk on Thursday granted a motion filed by media organizations. |
WXIA-TV reports the judge will probably sign an unsealing order in the coming days. The state is appealing. | WXIA-TV reports the judge will probably sign an unsealing order in the coming days. The state is appealing. |
Media lawyers argued the September sealing order violated the state and federal constitutions and court rules, because it was entered without public notice and without an opportunity for a hearing. The state argued the law exempts records sealed by court order. | Media lawyers argued the September sealing order violated the state and federal constitutions and court rules, because it was entered without public notice and without an opportunity for a hearing. The state argued the law exempts records sealed by court order. |