This article is from the source 'washpo' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/md-politics/effort-to-legalize-assisted-suicide-in-maryland-fails/2016/03/03/fe92ea74-e14b-11e5-846c-10191d1fc4ec_story.html

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Effort to legalize assisted suicide fails in Md. Senate Effort to legalize assisted suicide fails — again — in Maryland
(about 4 hours later)
Maryland legislation to allow terminally-ill adults to take their own lives was pulled by the Senate sponsor on Thursday, effectively ending a year-long push to make Maryland the sixth state in the country where assisted suicide is legal. An assisted-suicide bill failed in the Maryland Senate on Thursday, effectively ending a year-long push to make the state one of just a few in the nation where doctors can prescribe a lethal dose of medicine to the terminally ill.
Sen. Ronald Young (D-Frederick) told reporters that he decided to withdraw the legislation after concluding it did not have the votes to pass out of the Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee. A vote had been scheduled for Thursday. Sen. Ronald N. Young (D-Frederick) withdrew the legislation ahead of a scheduled vote in the Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee, after concluding that it did not have enough support to pass.
Maryland is one of 25 states, along with the District, that has introduced what advocates call “aid-in-dying” legislation since the highly publicized suicide of Brittany Maynard, a 29-year-old California woman who had terminal brain cancer and moved to Oregon in 2014 to legally end her life.
But of those states, only California has passed an assisted-suicide bill. A similar proposal in Maryland also failed in committee last year.
Kim Callinan, chief program officer for the advocacy group Compassion & Choices, said her organization will continue to push for passage of such legislation in Maryland and elsewhere. “From our experience, it takes multiple times,” Callinan said. “This is not uncommon.”
In addition to California and Oregon, aid in dying is permitted, with varying restrictions, in Washington state, Vermont and Montana.
[Doctor-assisted suicide bill unlikely to pass Md. Senate panel, sponsor says][Doctor-assisted suicide bill unlikely to pass Md. Senate panel, sponsor says]
The bill — which would have allowed doctors to prescribe a lethal dose of medication to patients believed to have less than six months to live — needed six votes to move out of committee and come before the full Senate. It was strongly opposed by the Catholic Church and advocates for the disabled. Maryland’s bill — which would have applied to patients believed to have less than six months to live — needed six votes to move out of committee and come before the full Senate.
“Had I thought it still had a chance I would have let it go,” Young said. “But I got word that it wasn’t going to pass.” While a majority of Marylanders have expressed support for assisted suicide in surveys, the bill was strongly opposed by the Catholic Church and disability advocates. They said that poor, minority and disabled communities already have limited options for good medical care and could be unduly pressured to ask doctors to help end their lives in order to avoid other, more expensive options.
Only two members of the Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee, Sen. Jamie Raskin (D-Montgomery) and Sen. Lisa Gladden (D-Baltimore City) expressed support for the bill. Both signed on as co-sponsors. Five members had said they opposed the legislation. Mary Ellen Russell, executive director of the Maryland Catholic Conference, said she was “relieved” that the legislation did not advance.
Young needed all four of the remaining senators on the committee to vote in favor of the bill in order for it to advance. Some of them expressed reservations about the bill and raised concerns about elderly and disabled people being pressured to end their lives. Young said he “got word” on Thursday that two of the four planned to vote against the measure. “Our opposition is one that we share on behalf of the many vulnerable populations that we advocate for,” she said. “We’re pleased to see that another year they will not be in harm’s way.”
[Agonizing over the right to die]
Only two members of the Judicial Proceedings Committee, Sen. Jamie Raskin (D-Montgomery) and Sen. Lisa Gladden (D-Baltimore City) expressed support for the bill. Both signed on as co-sponsors. Five members had said they opposed the legislation.
Young would have needed all four of the remaining senators on the committee to vote in favor of the bill in order for it to advance. He said he “got word” on Thursday that two of the four planned to vote against the measure.
“Had I thought it still had a chance, I would have let it go,” Young said.
Noting a recent Goucher College poll that showed widespread support for assisted suicide, Young said those who oppose the bill are going against the will of the people.Noting a recent Goucher College poll that showed widespread support for assisted suicide, Young said those who oppose the bill are going against the will of the people.
“Every demographic group supports it,” he said. “Catholics support it; Jews support it; African Americans support it; Republicans support it. More than 50 percent of every group supports it and the general public, 65 percent. But I think people on the committee let their own views come in.”“Every demographic group supports it,” he said. “Catholics support it; Jews support it; African Americans support it; Republicans support it. More than 50 percent of every group supports it and the general public, 65 percent. But I think people on the committee let their own views come in.”
Sen. Bobby A. Zirkin (D-Baltimore County), chairman of the committee, said he was surprised Young pulled the measure. Zirkin said he remained conflicted on Thursday and was uncertain how he would have voted. Sen. Bobby A. Zirkin (D-Baltimore County), chairman of the committee, said he was uncertain how he would have voted. “I’m very torn,” Zirkin said. “I hadn’t made up my mind.”
“I’m very torn,” Zirkin said. “It’s hard to be 100 percent one way or the other, but I hadn’t made up my mind.” Young said he does not know if he will sponsor the bill again next year. But Callinan said her group plans to continue to push for the legislation.
The measure was modeled after a bill that was signed into law last year in California. “We will not rest until Maryland lawmakers heed the will of the majority of their constituents and pass this bill,” she said.
A companion bill is still pending in the House of Delegates. But even if it succeeded in that chamber, it would have to be approved by the Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee, and then the full Senate, in order to become law. A companion bill is still pending in the House of Delegates. But even if it succeeded in that chamber, it would have to go through the Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee, and then the full Senate, in order to become law.
Del. Shane Pendergrass (D-Howard), the sponsor of the House legislation, said she is weighing the merits of trying to move the legislation forward in the House, knowing it would likely be blocked in the end by the Senate panel.Del. Shane Pendergrass (D-Howard), the sponsor of the House legislation, said she is weighing the merits of trying to move the legislation forward in the House, knowing it would likely be blocked in the end by the Senate panel.
“It’s a sad day for a lot of people,” Pendergrass said. “It’s very hard for me to understand anybody’s need to control someone else who has six months left to live and to tell them they don’t have this option.”“It’s a sad day for a lot of people,” Pendergrass said. “It’s very hard for me to understand anybody’s need to control someone else who has six months left to live and to tell them they don’t have this option.”