This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/mar/02/brazil-police-release-top-facebook-executive-from-jail

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Top Facebook executive released from Brazilian jail Top Facebook executive released from Brazilian jail
(about 2 hours later)
A Facebook executive arrested for refusing to give information about the company’s users to law enforcement has been released from jail.A Facebook executive arrested for refusing to give information about the company’s users to law enforcement has been released from jail.
Diego Dzodan, Facebook’s most senior representative in Latin America, left a jail in Sao Pãulo on Wednesday after one night in custody on a warrant issued by a judge in the north-eastern state of Sergipe. Diego Dzodan, Facebook’s most senior representative in Latin America, left a jail in Sao Pãulo on Wednesday after one night in custody on a warrant issued by a judge in the north-eastern state of Sergipe. A judge ruled he was wrongly detained because he was not named personally in the legal proceedings.
The warrant says Dzodan repeatedly failed to comply with a judicial order to cooperate with an investigation into drug trafficking and organized crime. The company had ignored requests to surrender user information from the WhatsApp messaging service, an application bought by Facebook in 2014. Another judge in Sergipe had issued an arrest warrant accusing Dzodan of repeatedly failing to comply with a judicial order to cooperate with an investigation into drug trafficking and organized crime. Monica Horta, a spokeswoman for the federal police in Sergipe, said investigators have requested content from a WhatsApp messaging group as well as other data, including geolocation.
According to police, investigators first contacted the company four months ago, but received no response. Starting two months ago, the company was fined 50,000 Brazilian reais ($12,700) for every day it ignored the order, an amount which rose to 1 million Brazilian reais ($250,000) in recent weeks. Related: Brazilian police arrest Facebook's Latin America vice-president
Investigators first contacted WhatsApp, which was bought by Facebook in 2014, about four months ago but have yet to receive a response, Horta said. Starting two months ago, WhatsApp began to incur a daily fine of 50,000 Brazilian reais ($12,700) for every day it ignored the order. The company has not yet paid the fine, which has risen to 1m Brazilian reais ($250,000) in recent weeks, she said.
Brazilian police argue that Facebook’s stance is at odds with those of Yahoo, Google and local telecommunications companies, which have been willing to hand over user information to help investigations.Brazilian police argue that Facebook’s stance is at odds with those of Yahoo, Google and local telecommunications companies, which have been willing to hand over user information to help investigations.
WhatsApp insists that it is unable to provide information that it does not have to the authorities. In a statement released on Wednesday, the company said: “Arresting people with no connection to pending law enforcement investigation is a capricious step and we are concerned about the effects for the people of Brazil and innovation in the country.” WhatsApp has been rolling out a so-called end-to-end encryption system under which only the sender and recipient can access the content of messages, and it insists it doesn’t have the information requested.
Related: Apple accuses FBI of violating constitutional rights in iPhone battle In a statement released on Wednesday, the company said: “Arresting people with no connection to pending law enforcement investigation is a capricious step and we are concerned about the effects for the people of Brazil and innovation in the country.”
The Brazilian authorities’ tussle with Facebook has drawn comparisons to the FBI’s battle with Apple following its request that the company unlock the iPhone belonging to one of the terrorists who carried out the San Bernardino killings.The Brazilian authorities’ tussle with Facebook has drawn comparisons to the FBI’s battle with Apple following its request that the company unlock the iPhone belonging to one of the terrorists who carried out the San Bernardino killings.
“The Apple vs FBI case and the WhatsApp case are in many ways exactly the same thing,” said Zaki Manian, a cryptography engineer and privacy activist. “The encryption systems employed by these companies is such that they do not have access to encrypted data. The only way the company could access the data would be to employ a malicious update to allow access.”“The Apple vs FBI case and the WhatsApp case are in many ways exactly the same thing,” said Zaki Manian, a cryptography engineer and privacy activist. “The encryption systems employed by these companies is such that they do not have access to encrypted data. The only way the company could access the data would be to employ a malicious update to allow access.”
While some companies have been willing to design systems in which intercepts were possible, many tech companies are taking the opposite approach in the wake of the reaction to the US National Security Agency’s mass-surveillance program revealed by the whistleblower Edward Snowden. Brazil has cast itself as a defender of internet freedom since revelations in 2014 that the US National Security Agency had spied on President Dilma Rousseff, her close advisers and Brazilian commercial interests, including the state-run oil company Petrobras.
“After the Snowden disclosures, my understanding was that the Brazilians were very upset to learn how easy it was for the NSA to spy on their communications,” said Chris Soghoian, the principal technologist of the American Civil Liberties Union. “What the Brazilians apparently want is something that cannot exist. There is no way to design a service that is secure from the NSA that allows local law enforcement access.” Related: Apple accuses FBI of violating constitutional rights in iPhone battle
Dzodan’s arrest is not the first time the Brazilian authorities have come into conflict with Facebook. In December a judicial order forced Brazil’s telecommunications companies to block WhatsApp over its refusal to cooperate with a police inquiry. The move snarled communications for many of its 100 million users in Brazil for around 12 hours. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg at the time said he was “stunned” by the “extreme decision” Rousseff canceled a state visit to the US during a diplomatic row over the disclosures, the result of leaks by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden. Rousseff also pledged to promote more home-grown internet services and make Brazil’s piece of the global internet less US-dependent.
Some analysts say that stance is at odds with actions such as the Dzodan detention.
“The Brazilians have spent several years complaining about the NSA. Technology companies have now delivered products to their customers that are much more secure from the NSA and the Brazilians are now complaining that they’re too secure,” said Chris Soghoian, principal technologist of the American Civil Liberties Union. “So maybe you should be careful what you wish for.”
“It seems like what governments want is ways to communicate that are secure from foreign governments, but that allow their own government to spy,” Soghoian said. “And the fact is that those tools don’t exist.
“If you want your communications to be secure from the NSA then they will also be secure from your local law enforcement.”
Brazilian authorities also clashed with Facebook in December, when a judicial order forced Brazil’s telecommunications companies to block WhatsApp over its refusal to cooperate with a police inquiry. The move shut down communications for many of its 100 million users in Brazil for around 12 hours. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg at the time said he was “stunned” by the “extreme decision”.
Robert Muggah, research director at Iguarape, a Rio de Janeiro-based thinktank, said the latest conflict over the WhatsApp messages could bolster support for proposed legislation that would allow judges to make more demands of tech companies.
“The danger with these cases is that the pendulum is swinging too far away from digital rights to law enforcement,” Muggah said.