This article is from the source 'washpo' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/a-hot-topic-surfaces-in-an-old-maryland-dui-case-alcohol-sensing-interlocks/2016/03/02/dcb2ee2e-e004-11e5-9c36-e1902f6b6571_story.html

The article has changed 10 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 4 Version 5
A hot topic surfaces in an old Maryland DUI case: Alcohol-sensing interlocks Maryland DUI Interlock case: Offender was at twice legal limit
(about 2 hours later)
A Maryland woman released early from prison after killing two people in a 2009 drunken-driving crash was sent back to jail Wednesday after an alcohol-sensing “interlock” device stopped her several times from starting her car.A Maryland woman released early from prison after killing two people in a 2009 drunken-driving crash was sent back to jail Wednesday after an alcohol-sensing “interlock” device stopped her several times from starting her car.
“I don’t know what to do with you,” an exasperated judge told Kelli Loos, 40, during a hearing in Montgomery County Circuit Court. “I don’t know what to do with you. I truly don’t,” an exasperated judge told Kelli Loos, 40, during a hearing in Montgomery County Circuit Court.
Judge Joseph Dugan ordered Loos be held without bond for 90 days, at which point he will decide on a more permanent sentence. Loos and her attorney are advocating she be sent to a treatment program. Prosecutors want incarceration. Judge Joseph Dugan ordered Loos held without bond for 90 days, at which point he will bring her back for sentencing. Loos and her attorney are advocating she go to a treatment program. Prosecutors want incarceration.
After tripping the device last year, Loos had claimed to parole officials that Altoids breath mints were the cause of the device indicating an alcohol infraction. She abandoned the claims about mints on Wednesday. After tripping the device last year, Loos claimed that Altoids breath mints were the cause of the device indicating alcohol infractions. In court Wednesday, she abandoned the mint claims.
Her case has new resonance in a state in which some lawmakers are pushing to toughen drunken-driving laws and penalties. “I made poor decisions,” she told Dugan, adding, “I need help.”
Her case has taken on new resonance in a state in which some lawmakers are pushing to toughen drunken-driving laws and penalties.
Two of the legislative proposals in Maryland: Raise the maximum sentence for vehicular manslaughter convictions, like those in the 2009 Loos case; and require anyone convicted of drunken-driving to install an interlock device, not just those drivers who exceed certain thresholds.Two of the legislative proposals in Maryland: Raise the maximum sentence for vehicular manslaughter convictions, like those in the 2009 Loos case; and require anyone convicted of drunken-driving to install an interlock device, not just those drivers who exceed certain thresholds.
Loos was paroled from prison in 2013, after serving four years of a 10-year sentence. She later was permitted to drive as long as she first blew into an interlock.
At least three times, the device halted her from starting her car when she was legally drunk, prosecutors said. One of the readings was a 0.16, which is twice the legal limit.
“Here she is: She’s back,” prosecutor Mark Anderson said in court Wednesday. “The interlock works or else she’d be driving around at these levels. These levels are ridiculous.”
Loos stood for much of the hearing on Wednesday, wiping away tears. Dugan ruled that she violated her probation for two reasons: Drinking, and trying to drive after drinking.
His voice raised, Dugan kept asking Loos why she would drink again — knowing she could be sent back to prison, knowing she had an 8-year-old daughter at home, knowing that she had killed two people while driving drunk seven years ago.
He said she was making rationalizations: Trouble being out on her own, a need for more rehabilitation, fears of going back to prison. His words led to a rapid exchange with Loos.
“You’re trying to make excuses,” Dugan said.
“No, I’m not,” Loos said.
“I did it because. I did it because,” Dugan said, imitating her. “All right, why did you do it?”
“Because I made poor decisions.”
“Why did you make poor decisions?”
“Because I need help.”
“Because,” Dugan responded, directing her on what to say, “I’m an alcoholic. And I can’t stop drinking.”
“Because I’m an alcoholic,” Loos said, correcting herself. “That’s what I meant. I’m sorry. I just didn’t use those words.”
“Well, you didn’t use those words because you don’t believe it.”
“No, I do believe it.”
“No, you don’t. If you did, you would have said that right from the beginning,” the judge told her.
“People just don’t take the issue of drinking and driving as deadly serious as they should,” Del. Benjamin Kramer (D-Montgomery County) said Tuesday.“People just don’t take the issue of drinking and driving as deadly serious as they should,” Del. Benjamin Kramer (D-Montgomery County) said Tuesday.
The widow of one of the men whom Loos killed, Gradys Mendoza, said Loos should have stayed in prison longer. “I feel as if justice was not made for the two families,” Maria Mendoza said in an interview Tuesday.The widow of one of the men whom Loos killed, Gradys Mendoza, said Loos should have stayed in prison longer. “I feel as if justice was not made for the two families,” Maria Mendoza said in an interview Tuesday.
After her husband died, she maintained hope the pain would ease. Their three children were 12 to 15 years old at the time. But the pain hasn’t receded, Mendoza said, and her children became adults without their dad. “We miss him more and more,” she said. “It gets harder.” After her husband died, she maintained hope the pain would ease. Their three children were 12- to 15- years old at the time. But the pain hasn’t receded, Mendoza said, and her children became adults without their dad. “We miss him more and more,” she said. “It gets harder.”
[The 2009 arrest: Kelli Loos was driving more than twice the legal limit ][The 2009 arrest: Kelli Loos was driving more than twice the legal limit ]
Charles Lipscomb, an attorney for Loos, said his client to show “genuine remorse and concern” for the victims’ families. Charles Lipscomb, an attorney for Loos, said his client has “genuine remorse and concern” for the victims’ families.
“She feels horrible, horrible,” Lipscomb said, adding that she thinks about the wreck and the two men who died every day. “She feels horrible, horrible,” Lipscomb said, adding that she thinks about the wreck and the men who died every day.
On the evening of July 7, 2009, Loos had gone with a friend to Hamburger Hamlet in Bethesda, where she drank a bottle of wine. She dropped off the friend and drove onto the Capital Beltway, heading south in a Jeep Cherokee.On the evening of July 7, 2009, Loos had gone with a friend to Hamburger Hamlet in Bethesda, where she drank a bottle of wine. She dropped off the friend and drove onto the Capital Beltway, heading south in a Jeep Cherokee.
Ahead of her was Gradys Mendoza, who owned a construction business, and his good friend, Franklin Manzanares. The men were sober, wearing seat belts, and coming home from signing a construction job contract.Ahead of her was Gradys Mendoza, who owned a construction business, and his good friend, Franklin Manzanares. The men were sober, wearing seat belts, and coming home from signing a construction job contract.
Loos struck their truck from behind, sending it skidding over a guardrail and airborne down a 60-foot ravine. Loos kept driving, into Virginia, where she crashed. She was found to have a blood-alcohol level of 0.20, more than twice the legal limit.Loos struck their truck from behind, sending it skidding over a guardrail and airborne down a 60-foot ravine. Loos kept driving, into Virginia, where she crashed. She was found to have a blood-alcohol level of 0.20, more than twice the legal limit.
Loos pleaded guilty to two counts of vehicular manslaughter and one count of leaving the scene of an accident. Each count carried a maximum penalty of 10 years, for a total of 30. As part of the plea deal, prosecutors agreed to limit their sentencing request to 20 years.Loos pleaded guilty to two counts of vehicular manslaughter and one count of leaving the scene of an accident. Each count carried a maximum penalty of 10 years, for a total of 30. As part of the plea deal, prosecutors agreed to limit their sentencing request to 20 years.
On May 19, 2010, Montgomery County Circuit Judge Louise G. Scrivener sentenced Loos to 10 years, giving her credit for time she served while detained after the wreck.On May 19, 2010, Montgomery County Circuit Judge Louise G. Scrivener sentenced Loos to 10 years, giving her credit for time she served while detained after the wreck.
Because the crimes to which Loos pleaded guilty are considered “nonviolent” under Maryland rules, she became eligible for parole consideration after serving 25 percent of her sentence.Because the crimes to which Loos pleaded guilty are considered “nonviolent” under Maryland rules, she became eligible for parole consideration after serving 25 percent of her sentence.
In July 2013, Loos was paroled, having served roughly 40 percent of her sentence. At her parole hearing, Loos was able to show a record of good behavior behind bars, presented herself as remorseful and took responsibility for the crime, said David R. Blumberg, chairman of the Maryland Parole Commission.In July 2013, Loos was paroled, having served roughly 40 percent of her sentence. At her parole hearing, Loos was able to show a record of good behavior behind bars, presented herself as remorseful and took responsibility for the crime, said David R. Blumberg, chairman of the Maryland Parole Commission.
“We have to balance all factors, and we try to make our best judgment,” he said.“We have to balance all factors, and we try to make our best judgment,” he said.
Loos is on parole supervision until 2019 and probation supervision until 2018, Blumberg said.Loos is on parole supervision until 2019 and probation supervision until 2018, Blumberg said.
She has a job and lives in Annapolis, according to court records, and has an interlock device on her car. Her test readings are relayed to a vendor. On July 11, 2015, the vendor reported to state officials that the previous day, the device prevented Loos’s car from starting after three alcohol reading, court records say. (The court records don’t specify the exact readings.)She has a job and lives in Annapolis, according to court records, and has an interlock device on her car. Her test readings are relayed to a vendor. On July 11, 2015, the vendor reported to state officials that the previous day, the device prevented Loos’s car from starting after three alcohol reading, court records say. (The court records don’t specify the exact readings.)
[The 2010 sentencing: Victim’s family/friends charter a bus to court ][The 2010 sentencing: Victim’s family/friends charter a bus to court ]
Loos was brought in for a parole-violation hearing, where she denied she had been drinking and said she had eaten Altoids mints that set off the interlock, according to Blumberg. She was found not guilty of a parole violation, he said.Loos was brought in for a parole-violation hearing, where she denied she had been drinking and said she had eaten Altoids mints that set off the interlock, according to Blumberg. She was found not guilty of a parole violation, he said.
The terms of her probation — and whether the interlock readings constitute a violation — was the subject of Wednesday’s hearing.The terms of her probation — and whether the interlock readings constitute a violation — was the subject of Wednesday’s hearing.
Kramer, the Maryland legislator, is sponsoring legislation that would lower the threshold for when an interlock would be required for a convicted drunk driver. Interlocks are mandated for drivers found to have been very drunk, with a blood-alcohol concentration of 0.15 or higher. Kramer wants to lower the threshold to the legal limit for drunken driving: 0.08.Kramer, the Maryland legislator, is sponsoring legislation that would lower the threshold for when an interlock would be required for a convicted drunk driver. Interlocks are mandated for drivers found to have been very drunk, with a blood-alcohol concentration of 0.15 or higher. Kramer wants to lower the threshold to the legal limit for drunken driving: 0.08.
In one regard, the Loos case does not relate to the legislative proposal. Loos was very drunk, at 0.20. But in another aspect, her case is relevant because it illustrates how interlocks prevent cars from starting, Kramer noted.In one regard, the Loos case does not relate to the legislative proposal. Loos was very drunk, at 0.20. But in another aspect, her case is relevant because it illustrates how interlocks prevent cars from starting, Kramer noted.
In the most recent year for which records are available, interlocks in Maryland had stopped at least 3,800 attempts — at 0.08 or higher — to drive drunk, Kramer said.In the most recent year for which records are available, interlocks in Maryland had stopped at least 3,800 attempts — at 0.08 or higher — to drive drunk, Kramer said.
“We know for a fact the interlock is working,” Kramer said.“We know for a fact the interlock is working,” Kramer said.
He also said the devices are designed to account for other substances that could create a false read, and that even if the ignition won’t start, drivers have the option of rinsing their mouths and re-blowing — which lets them use mouthwash, for example, and still drive. If someone has been drinking alcohol, Kramer said, the rinsing doesn’t work.He also said the devices are designed to account for other substances that could create a false read, and that even if the ignition won’t start, drivers have the option of rinsing their mouths and re-blowing — which lets them use mouthwash, for example, and still drive. If someone has been drinking alcohol, Kramer said, the rinsing doesn’t work.
In Northern Virginia, Maria Mendoza — the widow of one of the men hit by Loos — said that without her late husband’s income she has had to sell their home. Their children are in college — one at George Mason University and two at Northern Virginia Community College.In Northern Virginia, Maria Mendoza — the widow of one of the men hit by Loos — said that without her late husband’s income she has had to sell their home. Their children are in college — one at George Mason University and two at Northern Virginia Community College.
“I try to do the best I can,” she said. “I tell them: ‘Daddy wants you to go to school. We have to make Daddy proud.’ ”“I try to do the best I can,” she said. “I tell them: ‘Daddy wants you to go to school. We have to make Daddy proud.’ ”
While incarcerated, Loos wrote at least two letters to the judge who sentenced her. The letters, which are in court files, express deep sorrow from an inmate trying to recover and attend Alcoholics Anonymous meetings.While incarcerated, Loos wrote at least two letters to the judge who sentenced her. The letters, which are in court files, express deep sorrow from an inmate trying to recover and attend Alcoholics Anonymous meetings.
“I would sincerely give my life to bring Gradys Mendoza and Franklin Manzanares back to this earth and to their families,” Loos wrote. “Gradys and Franklin are my first thought each morning, and my last prayer at night.”“I would sincerely give my life to bring Gradys Mendoza and Franklin Manzanares back to this earth and to their families,” Loos wrote. “Gradys and Franklin are my first thought each morning, and my last prayer at night.”