This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/live/2016/mar/01/labor-steps-up-its-campaign-against-senate-voting-reform-politics-live
The article has changed 16 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Labor steps up its campaign against Senate voting reform – politics live | Labor steps up its campaign against Senate voting reform – politics live |
(35 minutes later) | |
10.13pm GMT | |
22:13 | |
The electoral commissioner is asked about a submission from Michael Maley, a former AEC official. | |
Maley argues in his submission to JSCEM the scheme proposed will create an anomaly never previously seen at Senate elections – identical preferences for candidates may produce a formal vote if the elector expresses them “above the line”, but an informal one if they are expressed “below the line” because the ballot paper would be insufficiently completed. | |
Stephen Conroy asks whether the commissioner accepts that Maley has expertise in this field. | |
Tom Rogers | |
He absolutely does. | |
So it he right? | |
Rogers says Maley has expressed a number of different views in his submission. He says he has no view on his political statement about the dichotomy above and below the line. | |
I have no view on that. | |
Rogers says the AEC will be advising Australians to lodge a formal vote. | |
10.03pm GMT | |
22:03 | |
Nick Xenophon wants to know how difficult it would be to amend the bill to fix the problems a couple of experts have raised – the disparity between practices above the line and below the line. | |
As constitutional law expert George Williams put it: | |
In particular, introducing optional preferential above-the-line voting, while retaining full preferential voting for below the line, creates an obvious and unfortunate disparity. The result will be a system in which below-the-line voting is significantly more onerous, thereby privileging the party-selected voting tickets applied in the case of an above-the-line vote. | |
The AEC officials don’t know how complicated this would be because they haven’t considered it. Can you consider it, Xenophon wants to know. Be good if you could. | |
Updated | |
at 10.13pm GMT | |
10.00pm GMT | |
22:00 | |
Crossbencher Ricky Muir isn’t convinced the AEC will have the time it needs to get the change implemented. | |
Tom Rogers repeats his advice that three months is the minimum. | |
If the bill changes significantly I will need to review that. If we don’t get the time we need and the funding we need its going to be very difficult to implement. | |
Updated | |
at 10.13pm GMT | |
9.56pm GMT | |
21:56 | |
Conroy has asked AEC officials for all written correspondence with the government on the bill. The officials have taken that on notice. Going to be a big night for JSCEM. A report from this committee is due to be tabled first thing tomorrow morning. | |
9.52pm GMT | |
21:52 | |
The electoral commissioner is telling the committee if this legislation becomes law, the AEC will run another voter education campaign to ensure people understand the changes. | |
Tom Rogers | |
We will be seeking additional funding. We are working with finance at the moment on those costs. | |
The commissioner declines to share the dollar figure he’s seeking because it contains a commercial-in-confidence element. | |
Labor’s Stephen Conroy asks who identified flaws in the bill when it was introduced last week in the House of Representatives. The government had to bring forward amendments to the bill to make sure Senate votes were counted on election night. | |
The AEC says it wasn’t them. Who was it? Was it finance? Ah, finance is not here, goes the Conroy riff. | |
9.45pm GMT | |
21:45 | |
While I’m listening to this, Andrew Probyn from the West Australian this morning has unearthed what looks like material for the shadow cabinet deliberations on Senate voting reform. Advice from David Feeney (called in by the Labor leader Bill Shorten to try and resolve the internal row between Stephen Conroy and the shadow special minister of state Gary Gray) indicated the reforms proposed by JSCEM would “heighten the risk of a government Senate majority.” | |
Andrew Probyn: | |
Similarly, a report by Paul Erickson, the assistant national secretary of the ALP, concludes that “over two election cycles, this scenario would see the coalition win control of the Senate following the second election”. | |
9.40pm GMT | |
21:40 | |
The electoral commissioner Tom Rogers has been asked by the Family First Senator Bob Day for his assessment of the policy change on voting behaviour. He declines to speculate about that. | |
9.34pm GMT | 9.34pm GMT |
21:34 | 21:34 |
Meanwhile, outside the building. | Meanwhile, outside the building. |
Updated | |
at 10.03pm GMT | |
9.31pm GMT | 9.31pm GMT |
21:31 | 21:31 |
Labor’s deputy Senate leader, Stephen Conroy, is leading the questioning at the moment in the JSCEM on the Senate voting package. It’s taken about four goes to get an answer to the question, when did the AEC first get consulted on the bill? The answer is the AEC’s legal counsel saw a draft version on February 11 (but the organisation provided input via the department of finance earlier on.) | |
Conroy notes that he’d like to seek clarification from the department of finance but officials have not been permitted to attend today’s hearings. | Conroy notes that he’d like to seek clarification from the department of finance but officials have not been permitted to attend today’s hearings. |
Updated | |
at 9.55pm GMT | |
9.22pm GMT | 9.22pm GMT |
21:22 | 21:22 |
The hearing on Senate voting reform is kicking off now with officials from the Australian Electoral Commission. The AEC is telling the committee it will need three months to roll the new system out. If the bill changes, it might take longer than three months. | The hearing on Senate voting reform is kicking off now with officials from the Australian Electoral Commission. The AEC is telling the committee it will need three months to roll the new system out. If the bill changes, it might take longer than three months. |
9.15pm GMT | 9.15pm GMT |
21:15 | 21:15 |
I’ve just got one thing to say about Abbott on Safe Schools. Tony Abbott was the prime minister for two years. He’s not a bystander. If he had such a problem with this program, why did he consent to continuing to roll it out? | |
Updated | |
at 9.52pm GMT | |
9.11pm GMT | 9.11pm GMT |
21:11 | 21:11 |
Shalailah Medhora | Shalailah Medhora |
There’s also this. The former prime minister Tony Abbott has called for the immediate defunding of the Safe Schools program, saying it goes beyond its scope as an anti-bullying initiative. Abbott spoke to the Australian newspaper on Tuesday. | There’s also this. The former prime minister Tony Abbott has called for the immediate defunding of the Safe Schools program, saying it goes beyond its scope as an anti-bullying initiative. Abbott spoke to the Australian newspaper on Tuesday. |
“It’s not an anti-bullying program,” he said. “It’s a social engineering program. Its funding should be terminated.” | “It’s not an anti-bullying program,” he said. “It’s a social engineering program. Its funding should be terminated.” |
Abbott is the latest conservative member of the Coalition to speak out against the initiative, which aims to stamp out homophobia and transphobia in schools. | Abbott is the latest conservative member of the Coalition to speak out against the initiative, which aims to stamp out homophobia and transphobia in schools. |
8.59pm GMT | 8.59pm GMT |
20:59 | 20:59 |
Top of the morning to you | Top of the morning to you |
Hello lovely people and welcome to Tuesday in Canberra, where there is scattered cloud, blue skies and lashings of contention. | |
With the government now sprinting in the direction of pushing Senate voting reform through the parliament with the support of the Greens and Nick Xenophon, Labor is attempting to slam on the brakes. Labor’s Senate leader, Penny Wong, has been on the ABC already criticising the Greens for participating in a strategy that looks very likely to smooth the path to a double-dissolution election, which could see the abolition of the Clean Energy Finance Corporation if the government chooses to invoke one of its previously stashed triggers. | |
The government’s voting reform package will this morning be the subject of a quick sticks inquiry by the joint parliamentary committee on electoral matters – a process that was compared in the Senate by Labor’s deputy leader Stephen Conroy last night to a sham process in Stalin’s Russia. (I did give you that weather forecast first up. Blustery.) | The government’s voting reform package will this morning be the subject of a quick sticks inquiry by the joint parliamentary committee on electoral matters – a process that was compared in the Senate by Labor’s deputy leader Stephen Conroy last night to a sham process in Stalin’s Russia. (I did give you that weather forecast first up. Blustery.) |
With resistance to the reform model building, the finance minister and special minister of state, Mathias Cormann, has been deployed this morning as the cooler on the wireless. Sure these are the biggest changes to the Australian voting system in 30 years and, sure, today there will be a four-hour inquiry to examine them, but this is all fine. Cormann says the government is proceeding with 85% of the recommendations of a previous inquiry by the joint committee on electoral matters. He says the government is intent on ensuring voters have the ultimate say with their Senate vote. He says Labor used to support this proposal but now it doesn’t. He says Labor’s national secretary, George Wright, isn’t even appearing at today’s hearing. | |
ABC Radio National host Fran Kelly puts to Cormann the government is flat out creating an impression it’s on an inelegant sprint to a double dissolution election, never mind the technicalities, like whether its current voting reform proposal creates a whole set of new problems (as some legal experts suggest it does.) | ABC Radio National host Fran Kelly puts to Cormann the government is flat out creating an impression it’s on an inelegant sprint to a double dissolution election, never mind the technicalities, like whether its current voting reform proposal creates a whole set of new problems (as some legal experts suggest it does.) |
Mathias Cormann: | Mathias Cormann: |
We don’t accept that at all. | We don’t accept that at all. |
The JSCEM inquiry kicks off shortly after 8, and I’ll cover as much of that as I can consistent with the other thundering madness of the political day. | The JSCEM inquiry kicks off shortly after 8, and I’ll cover as much of that as I can consistent with the other thundering madness of the political day. |
Lots more on the go – we expect backbenchers to raise concerns in the Coalition party room today about the current government vacuum on tax policy and the industrial-sized hints that the government might do something on negative gearing. There are reports that the government’s media reform package will also go to the party room today. | |
Let’s power on, the comments thread is open for your business. We are also up and about on the Twits – Mikearoo is at @mpbowers and I’m @murpharoo | Let’s power on, the comments thread is open for your business. We are also up and about on the Twits – Mikearoo is at @mpbowers and I’m @murpharoo |
Construct a sound barrier, a bunch of cardboard boxes in a dome shape is fine, I suspect you might need it. | Construct a sound barrier, a bunch of cardboard boxes in a dome shape is fine, I suspect you might need it. |
Here comes Tuesday. | Here comes Tuesday. |
Updated | |
at 9.52pm GMT |