This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jan/10/david-cameron-stay-as-pm-if-i-lose-eu-referendum

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
David Cameron: I will stay as PM if I lose EU referendum David Cameron: I will stay as PM if I lose EU referendum
(about 7 hours later)
David Cameron has moved to sever any link between the EU referendum and his own political future by saying that he will remain as prime minister even if he loses the vote on British membership. David Cameron has moved to sever any link between the EU referendum and his own political future by stating he will remain prime minister even if he loses the vote on British membership.
As he confirmed that he hoped to hold the referendum in the summer, the prime minister said his authority rested on holding the vote, not the result. As Cameron confirmed he hoped to hold the in/out referendum in the summer, he said that his authority rested on holding the vote, not the result of it.
But in an interview on The Andrew Marr Show on BBC1, the prime minister gave his clearest statement yet that he wanted Britain to remain in the EU. Asked whether he was prepared for the possibility of a UK exit, Cameron said: “I don’t think that is the right answer for the reasons I have given. But were that to be the answer we would have to do everything to make that work.” In his annual new year interview with The Andrew Marr Show on BBC1, Cameron gave his clearest signal to date that he is determined to maintain Britain’s membership of the EU.
Related: Two-thirds of Tory MPs want Britain to quit European UnionRelated: Two-thirds of Tory MPs want Britain to quit European Union
The prime minister was keen in his new year interview with Marr to repeat the tactic he deployed in the Scottish referendum. This was to kill of any attempt to link his future to the referendum result by saying he would remain in office even if he lost. Asked whether he was prepared for the possibility of a Brexit, the prime minister said: “I don’t think that is the right answer for the reasons I have given.” But he said he would have to make an exit work if voters rejected EU membership.
In the final weeks of the Scottish referendum, when polls suggested that the people of Scotland might vote for independence, the prime minister did privately draw up a resignation letter. It was widely felt in Downing Street that his position would have been untenable had he lost the referendum. But he did not want to give any public hint of his thinking. Making clear where his heart lies, Cameron added: “I’m clear in politics what my goal is: my goal is renegotiation, referendum, secure Britain’s place in a reformed European Union.”
The prime minister expressed confidence in his Marr interview that he was making progress in his negotiations with Britain’s EU partners. He said: “It is hard work. But the areas that I have identified are the things that drive us up the wall about Europe that we need to deal with. Let’s make sure we are not part of an ever closer union. I think we are on the way to getting that fixed. The idea that Europe must add to our competitiveness, not take away from our competitiveness, making sure this isn’t just a single currency club but it is flexible enough for countries like Britain with our own currency. And then dealing with this issue of the abuse of free movement and the pressure of migration from the EU on Britain by amending welfare rules.” Eurosceptics said the prime minister had shown he is working on the assumption that he will campaign for a yes vote in the referendum – after hailing his negotiations as a success – when he indicated that no contingency plans are being made for an exit.
The former shadow home secretary David Davis told the Sunday Politics on BBC1 that the prime minister’s suggestionthat no such plans were being made was ‘disgraceful’. “You’ve got two moderately likely outcomes, we don’t know which it will be,” he said.
It is understood that at least one minister has suggested to Downing Street that it would be a wise precaution to make contingency plans for an out vote. This has been rebuffed by No 10.
The prime minister expressed confidence in his progress in negotiations with Britain’s EU partners to address what he described as EU issues that “drive us up the wall”.
“It is hard work,” he said. “But the areas that I have identified are the things that drive us up the wall about Europe that we need to deal with. Let’s make sure we are not part of an ever-closer union. I think we are on the way to getting that fixed.
“The idea that Europe must add to our competitiveness, not take away from our competitiveness, making sure this isn’t just a single currency club but it is flexible enough for countries like Britain with our own currency. And then dealing with this issue of the abuse of free movement and the pressure of migration from the EU on Britain by amending welfare rules.”
Cameron added that he was confident of a deal at the next EU summit in February. This would allow a referendum to be held by June. But it is widely expected the legal complexities of the negotiations mean that a deal may have to wait until the following EU summit in March, which would delay a referendum until September. The prime minister said in his interview that he is prepared to wait longer to secure the right deal.Cameron added that he was confident of a deal at the next EU summit in February. This would allow a referendum to be held by June. But it is widely expected the legal complexities of the negotiations mean that a deal may have to wait until the following EU summit in March, which would delay a referendum until September. The prime minister said in his interview that he is prepared to wait longer to secure the right deal.
Related: I’m backing George Osborne’s Project Fear – if it helps keep us in Europe | Martin KettleRelated: I’m backing George Osborne’s Project Fear – if it helps keep us in Europe | Martin Kettle
The prime minister also confirmed that the government was following the precedent of the Scottish referendum by declining to make contingency plans for a rejection of the status quo. Sajid Javid, the business secretary, would be the natural figure to make such plans to soften the impact on business during the two years of negotiations that would be held to agree an exit settlement. But No 10 has rejected the idea. He was keen to repeat the tactic he deployed before the Scottish independence referendum to kill of any attempt to link his future to the result. Asked if he would remain as prime minister if he lost the EU vote, he said: “The answer to that is yes. My policy is to hold a renegotiation and then a referendum. That is what we promised in the manifesto and then to abide by what the British public say. Now I hope that answer will be staying in a reformed Europe.
Meanwhile, political veterans from both sides of the Scottish independence vote said they would join forces to campaign for the UK to remain in the EU. Former Labour MP Frank Roy, who lost his Motherwell and Wishaw seat to the SNP in last May’s general election, has been appointed Scottish campaign director for Stronger In. Kevin Pringle, the SNP’s former director of communications, will provide advice in his new role at Edinburgh-based PR firm Charlotte Street Partners. “The question on the ballot paper is very clear: it is stay in or go. It is not this politician’s future or that politician’s future. That is very important or otherwise we may not get the answer we need … My authority depends on holding the renegotiation, holding the referendum. That is what I promised, that is what I must deliver.”
Announcing the appointments, Will Straw, executive director of Stronger In, said: “Frank and Kevin have both served their different parties well, and I believe will serve Scotland as a whole well by working together in an inclusive Stronger In campaign.” Acknowledging the pair’s divergent political pasts, Pringle suggested that a successful campaign could help “bridge the divide of the independence referendum” for Scotland. In the final weeks of the Scottish referendum, when polls suggested that the people of Scotland might vote for independence, the prime minister did privately draw up a resignation letter. It was widely felt in Downing Street that his position would have been untenable had he lost the referendum. But he did not want to give any public hint of his thinking.
.