This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/entertainment/7302736.stm
The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 1 | Version 2 |
---|---|
Mills gave 'inaccurate' evidence | |
(20 minutes later) | |
Heather Mills' evidence in her divorce case with Sir Paul McCartney was "inconsistent, inaccurate" and "less than candid", according to the judge. | |
Mr Justice Bennett's High Court ruling has been revealed in full after Ms Mills was told she could not appeal against its publication. | |
She wanted it kept secret because she said it contained details that could her affect her daughter's security. | |
The decision came a day after a High Court judge awarded Ms Mills £24.3m. | The decision came a day after a High Court judge awarded Ms Mills £24.3m. |
The judge determined the final figure after the couple failed to reach an agreement in court last month. | The judge determined the final figure after the couple failed to reach an agreement in court last month. |
BREAKDOWN OF MILLS' £125M CLAIM £3.2m per year for herself and BeatriceProperties in Los Angeles and New YorkBetween £8m and £12.5m for a home in London£3m to purchase a New York home£500,000 to £750,000 to buy a London officeMonetary value on compensation for loss of earnings | |
Ms Mills was not in court to hear two Court of Appeal judges rule that divorce hearing judge Mr Justice Bennett's decision to publish his entire ruling could not be challenged. | Ms Mills was not in court to hear two Court of Appeal judges rule that divorce hearing judge Mr Justice Bennett's decision to publish his entire ruling could not be challenged. |
'In danger' | 'In danger' |
David Rosen, who represented her in court on Tuesday, said: "Miss Mills believes her daughter will be put in real danger. It is most disturbing." | |
Mr Rosen confirmed that the ruling marks the end of Ms Mills' appeal against the publication. | |
After yesterday's settlement, Ms Mills said: "I'm not appealing against the judgment because it's not worth it. | After yesterday's settlement, Ms Mills said: "I'm not appealing against the judgment because it's not worth it. |
BREAKDOWN OF MCCARTNEY'S £15.8M OFFER Costs, not exceeding £150,000 per year, for security would be met for two yearsAnnual, index-linked payments of £35,000 for Beatrice until she is 17 or ends secondary educationNanny would be employed for no more than £25,000He would discharge costs for school fees, uniforms and reasonable extrasLump sum for the return of some art | |
"I'm appealing against the publication of it because it has so many details of me and my daughter in it." | "I'm appealing against the publication of it because it has so many details of me and my daughter in it." |
Lump sum | Lump sum |
Following the ruling, Ms Mills will receive £14m for herself and £2.5m to buy a house in London. | Following the ruling, Ms Mills will receive £14m for herself and £2.5m to buy a house in London. |
Sir Paul will pay for Beatrice's nanny and school fees, and give the four-year-old £35,000 a year. The judge awarded a lump sum of £16.5m and assets of £7.8m. | Sir Paul will pay for Beatrice's nanny and school fees, and give the four-year-old £35,000 a year. The judge awarded a lump sum of £16.5m and assets of £7.8m. |
The settlement equated to £17,000 for every day of the couple's marriage. | The settlement equated to £17,000 for every day of the couple's marriage. |
The judge found the total value of Sir Paul's assets was about £400m. Ms Mills had sought £125m and been offered £15.8m. | The judge found the total value of Sir Paul's assets was about £400m. Ms Mills had sought £125m and been offered £15.8m. |
Sir Paul, 65, and Ms Mills, 40, got married in 2002, but they split four years later, blaming media intrusion into their private lives. | Sir Paul, 65, and Ms Mills, 40, got married in 2002, but they split four years later, blaming media intrusion into their private lives. |