This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/entertainment/7302736.stm

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Mills loses divorce ruling appeal Mills gave 'inaccurate' evidence
(20 minutes later)
Full details of the divorce of Sir Paul McCartney and Heather Mills have been made public after Ms Mills was told she could not appeal against publication. Heather Mills' evidence in her divorce case with Sir Paul McCartney was "inconsistent, inaccurate" and "less than candid", according to the judge.
Ms Mills said she wanted to keep the full ruling secret because it contained private details that could affect the security of their daughter Beatrice. Mr Justice Bennett's High Court ruling has been revealed in full after Ms Mills was told she could not appeal against its publication.
She wanted it kept secret because she said it contained details that could her affect her daughter's security.
The decision came a day after a High Court judge awarded Ms Mills £24.3m.The decision came a day after a High Court judge awarded Ms Mills £24.3m.
The judge determined the final figure after the couple failed to reach an agreement in court last month.The judge determined the final figure after the couple failed to reach an agreement in court last month.
BREAKDOWN OF MILLS' £125M CLAIM £3.2m per year for herself and BeatriceProperties in Los Angeles and New YorkBetween £8m and £12.5m for a home in London£3m to purchase a New York home£500,000 to £750,000 to buy a London officeMonetary value on compensation for loss of earnings
Ms Mills was not in court to hear two Court of Appeal judges rule that divorce hearing judge Mr Justice Bennett's decision to publish his entire ruling could not be challenged.Ms Mills was not in court to hear two Court of Appeal judges rule that divorce hearing judge Mr Justice Bennett's decision to publish his entire ruling could not be challenged.
'In danger''In danger'
David Rosen, who represented her, said: "Miss Mills believes her daughter will be put in real danger. It is most disturbing." David Rosen, who represented her in court on Tuesday, said: "Miss Mills believes her daughter will be put in real danger. It is most disturbing."
Mr Rosen has confirmed that the ruling marks the end of Ms Mills' appeal against the publication. Mr Rosen confirmed that the ruling marks the end of Ms Mills' appeal against the publication.
After yesterday's settlement, Ms Mills said: "I'm not appealing against the judgment because it's not worth it.After yesterday's settlement, Ms Mills said: "I'm not appealing against the judgment because it's not worth it.
BREAKDOWN OF MCCARTNEY'S £15.8M OFFER Costs, not exceeding £150,000 per year, for security would be met for two yearsAnnual, index-linked payments of £35,000 for Beatrice until she is 17 or ends secondary educationNanny would be employed for no more than £25,000He would discharge costs for school fees, uniforms and reasonable extrasLump sum for the return of some art
"I'm appealing against the publication of it because it has so many details of me and my daughter in it.""I'm appealing against the publication of it because it has so many details of me and my daughter in it."
Lump sumLump sum
Following the ruling, Ms Mills will receive £14m for herself and £2.5m to buy a house in London.Following the ruling, Ms Mills will receive £14m for herself and £2.5m to buy a house in London.
Sir Paul will pay for Beatrice's nanny and school fees, and give the four-year-old £35,000 a year. The judge awarded a lump sum of £16.5m and assets of £7.8m.Sir Paul will pay for Beatrice's nanny and school fees, and give the four-year-old £35,000 a year. The judge awarded a lump sum of £16.5m and assets of £7.8m.
The settlement equated to £17,000 for every day of the couple's marriage.The settlement equated to £17,000 for every day of the couple's marriage.
The judge found the total value of Sir Paul's assets was about £400m. Ms Mills had sought £125m and been offered £15.8m.The judge found the total value of Sir Paul's assets was about £400m. Ms Mills had sought £125m and been offered £15.8m.
Sir Paul, 65, and Ms Mills, 40, got married in 2002, but they split four years later, blaming media intrusion into their private lives.Sir Paul, 65, and Ms Mills, 40, got married in 2002, but they split four years later, blaming media intrusion into their private lives.