This article is from the source 'washpo' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/africa/south-africas-last-apartheid-president-takes-heat/2015/12/29/d62359ac-ae0b-11e5-b281-43c0b56f61fa_story.html

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
South Africa’s last apartheid president takes heat South Africa’s last apartheid president takes heat
(about 1 hour later)
JOHANNESBURG — For years, South Africa’s last white president opined on post-apartheid rule without getting much attention in a country anxious to shed its racist past. Now F.W. de Klerk is being vilified for remarks about the legacy of British colonialist Cecil John Rhodes.JOHANNESBURG — For years, South Africa’s last white president opined on post-apartheid rule without getting much attention in a country anxious to shed its racist past. Now F.W. de Klerk is being vilified for remarks about the legacy of British colonialist Cecil John Rhodes.
The furor follows criticism by de Klerk of a campaign to take down a statue of Rhodes at Britain’s Oxford University, echoing protests that led to the removal of a Rhodes statue at the University of Cape Town in South Africa. The furor stems from criticism by de Klerk of a campaign to take down a statue of Rhodes at Britain’s Oxford University, echoing protests that led to the removal of a Rhodes statue at the University of Cape Town in South Africa. De Klerk said in a letter to the British newspaper The Times that the campaign against Rhodes was “folly” because few historical figures associated with Oxford could withstand today’s standards of “political correctness.”
In a Facebook posting Monday, Oxford activists said de Klerk exhibited “white arrogance.” In a message to de Klerk on Monday, Oxford activists said he exhibited “white arrogance” for comments on Rhodes, described by historians as a segregationist who made a fortune at the expense of the local population in southern Africa. Rhodes is also known as a philanthropist who lent his name to the prestigious Rhodes scholarship.
A South African opposition party says de Klerk is unworthy of the Nobel Peace Prize, which he was awarded jointly with Nelson Mandela in 1993 for their work to dismantle apartheid. “Don’t get it twisted: the only reason you didn’t remove statues of Rhodes in South Africa was because you were committed to white domination, not because you cared about black people,” read the posting on the Facebook page of the group “Rhodes Must Fall in Oxford.”
Also, a small but vocal South African opposition party, the Economic Freedom Fighters, said de Klerk was unworthy of the Nobel Peace Prize, which he was awarded jointly with Nelson Mandela in 1993 for their work to dismantle white minority rule.
The party said a public statue of de Klerk should be sent to a museum about the apartheid era. Bronze statues of de Klerk, Mandela and two other Nobel laureates from South Africa stand on the Cape Town waterfront.
Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.