This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/19/world/middleeast/syria-talks-isis.html

The article has changed 9 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
World Powers, Meeting in New York, to Address Syrian War and ISIS World Powers, Meeting in New York, to Address Syrian War and ISIS
(about 2 hours later)
UNITED NATIONS — Diplomats from more than a dozen countries were expected to meet Friday morning in New York, with an eye to drawing the Syrian war to a close and to focusing the world’s attention on the threat of the Islamic State. But whether they can put aside their rivalries and fulfill promises they have made in pursuit of a cease-fire and peace talks by January remains unclear. UNITED NATIONS — Diplomats from more than a dozen countries met at the Palace Hotel in New York on Friday morning to discuss ending the Syrian civil war and focusing the world’s attention on the threat of the Islamic State.
At issue is whether the world powers that all have large stakes in the war can end the fighting and with it, help stem the refugee crisis in Europe and the threat posed by the Islamic State. But it remained unclear whether the major powers could put aside their rivalries and fulfill a key goal a United Nations Security Council resolution endorsing a plan for resolving the conflict.
This is the third meeting of the so-called International Syria Support Group, which also includes the Arab League and the European Union. The group is led by the top envoys of the United States and Russia, and it includes the regional rivals Iran, Saudi Arabia and Turkey, which have vastly different agendas in Syria. At issue is whether the world powers that all have large stakes in the war can end the fighting, and in that way help stem the refugee crisis in Europe and the threat posed by the Islamic State.
The last two rounds of talks, held in Vienna in October and November, produced a road map for diplomacy: a cease-fire by January; talks between the Syrian government and opposition parties, mediated by the United Nations; and elections in 18 months. The last two rounds of talks, held in Vienna in October and November, produced a diplomatic road map for Syria: a cease-fire by January, followed by talks between the Syrian government and opposition parties, mediated by the United Nations, and elections in 18 months.
The talks this week aim to produce a United Nations Security Council resolution by the end of the day. That resolution is intended to give the international support group and the road map for peace the Council’s blessing, diplomats say, but it has been held up by crucial differences between Russia and the United States. This is the third meeting of the so-called International Syria Support Group, which is led by the top envoys of the United States and Russia, and includes the regional rivals Iran, Saudi Arabia and Turkey, which have vastly different agendas in Syria, as well as the Arab League and the European Union.
There are at least three unresolved issues: which groups in Syria should be defined as terrorists, whether the Council will recognize the bloc of Syrian opposition groups that came together in Saudi Arabia last week, and whether President Bashar al-Assad should be allowed to run for another term. American officials said that before the full group began its discussions on Friday, Secretary of State John Kerry had conferred with his Russian counterpart, Sergey V. Lavrov, and that they had then met with envoys of the other three permanent members of the Security Council Britain, China and France.
Western diplomats at the United Nations said they were not certain that they could reach consensus. The talks are meant to produce a resolution by the end of the day, giving the council’s blessing to the international support group and to the road map for peace. Diplomats say the work has been held up by crucial differences between Russia and the United States.
“There are still differences of opinion about Assad and his specific future,” John Kirby, a State Department spokesman, told reporters in Washington on Thursday. There were at least three unresolved issues when the talks began: which groups in Syria should be defined as terrorists, whether the Council would recognize the bloc of Syrian opposition groups that came together in Saudi Arabia last week, and whether President Bashar al-Assad should be allowed to run for another term in office.
Mr. Kirby referred to the agreement struck at the last meeting of the support group, which left Mr. Assad’s future unresolved. It referred to “a unified, pluralistic, nonsectarian, whole Syria,” he said. Western diplomats at the United Nations said they were not certain a consensus could be reached. “There are still differences of opinion about Assad and his specific future,” John Kirby, a State Department spokesman, told reporters in Washington on Thursday.
One of the trickiest parts of the road map for diplomacy will be composing a list of groups in Syria that are considered terrorist organizations. Jordan has been assigned that task, but diplomats have warned that pinning down such a list could make a final settlement even more difficult. Mr. Kirby referred to the agreement struck at the last meeting of the support group, which left Mr. Assad’s future unresolved. It called for “a unified, pluralistic, nonsectarian, whole Syria,” he said.
The meeting on Friday follows a rare sign of consensus among the world powers Thursday afternoon, when the Security Council unanimously adopted a legally binding resolution intended to prevent the Islamic State, Al Qaeda and other terrorist groups from raising money. The British ambassador to the United Nations, Matthew Rycroft, said outside the hotel gates Friday morning that the prospects of completing a draft resolution were “hopeful but not guaranteed.” He confirmed that the question of whether Mr. Assad would have to step down would not be addressed in the resolution.
Mr. Kerry met with the Saudi foreign minister, Adel al-Jubeir, on Thursday evening, and is scheduled to meet with the Iranian foreign minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, later on Friday. The seating plan for the group talks Friday morning had Mr. Jubeir and Mr. Zarif directly facing each other across the U-shaped negotiating table.
One of the trickiest parts of the road map for diplomacy will be composing a list of groups in Syria that are considered terrorist organizations and would be excluded from the peace process. Jordan has been assigned that task.
A related question is who will represent the Syrian opposition in the peace talks. Russia, in particular, is reluctant to endorse a role for Saudi Arabia in assembling that bloc, western diplomats said.
The meeting on Friday follows a rare show of unity among the world powers Thursday afternoon, when the Security Council unanimously adopted a legally binding resolution intended to prevent the Islamic State, Al Qaeda and other terrorist groups from raising money.
Jacob J. Lew, the United States Treasury secretary, said the measure was “designed to starve them of the resources they need to operate.”Jacob J. Lew, the United States Treasury secretary, said the measure was “designed to starve them of the resources they need to operate.”
One of the most incongruous parts of the resolution was that the government of Syria was one of its co-sponsors.One of the most incongruous parts of the resolution was that the government of Syria was one of its co-sponsors.
The Syrian ambassador to the United Nations, Bashar al-Jaafari, told reporters on Thursday that he would participate in the Council meeting on Friday.The Syrian ambassador to the United Nations, Bashar al-Jaafari, told reporters on Thursday that he would participate in the Council meeting on Friday.
The diplomatic advance comes alongside intensified violence in Syria, with the United States, its European partners and its rival, Russia, all conducting airstrikes in the country. The diplomatic advance comes alongside intensified violence in Syria, with the United States, its European partners, and Russia all conducting airstrikes in the country.