This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/wales/7295619.stm

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Waterhouse attacks child decision Children 'let down' on complaints
(about 2 hours later)
The man who presided over the North Wales Child Abuse inquiry in the 1990s has launched a scathing attack on the assembly government. The man who presided over the north Wales child abuse inquiry has attacked a failure to set up an independent body to deal with young people's complaints.
Sir Ronald Waterhouse said he was "scandalised" by the decision not to establish a national independent body to deal with young people's complaints. Sir Ronald Waterhouse said it was a "remarkable" decision by the Welsh Assembly government.
But the children's minister, Jane Hutt, insists that services provided by local authorities can be just as independent. Helen Mary Jones, chair of the assembly children's committee, said the most vulnerable young were being let down.
Sir Ronald told BBC Wales' Dragon's Eye that it was a "remarkable" decision. But Children's Minister Jane Hutt insisted services provided by local authorities can be just as independent.
Campaigners have argued for over a decade that local authorities should not be responsible for investigating complaints by children in their care. Campaigners have argued for more than a decade that local authorities should not be responsible for investigating complaints by children in their care.
That view was also backed by the first Children's Commissioner for Wales, Peter Clarke, and also an assembly committee. That view was also backed by the first Children's Commissioner for Wales Peter Clarke, and an assembly committee.
I simply don't know why they have done this and I find it remarkable Sir Ronald WaterhouseI simply don't know why they have done this and I find it remarkable Sir Ronald Waterhouse
Helen Mary Jones, the chair of the assembly's children and young people committee, said she was "profoundly disappointed" by the move. Plaid AM Ms Jones said she was "profoundly disappointed" by the move.
"Of course its not me and the committee that they're letting down it is the most vulnerable children in this country. They deserve better," said the Plaid Cymru AM. "Of course it's not me and the committee that they're letting down, it is the most vulnerable children in this country. They deserve better," she said.
The assembly government has set up an independent advisory board as well what is being called a "national advocacy and advice service".The assembly government has set up an independent advisory board as well what is being called a "national advocacy and advice service".
However, while the advocacy service promises to be a national single point of contact for children and young people in Wales, it will also be referring cases to local counselling services.However, while the advocacy service promises to be a national single point of contact for children and young people in Wales, it will also be referring cases to local counselling services.
In a statement, Jane Hutt said: "It is not clear how a service that was funded directly by the assembly government would intrinsically be any more independent than one commissioned locally." In a statement, Ms Hutt said: "It is not clear how a service that was funded directly by the assembly government would intrinsically be any more independent than one commissioned locally."
'Red herring''Red herring'
But setting out his objection to the decision, former High Court Judge Sir Ronald Waterhouse claimed that under local counselling and advocacy services, a child "would not have confidence that what he or she says to the advocate is going to be treated in confidence". But setting out his objection to the decision, former High Court Judge Sir Ronald claimed that under local counselling and advocacy services, a child "would not have confidence that what he or she says to the advocate is going to be treated in confidence".
Backing a centrally-funded all-Wales service, he added: "I simply don't know why they have done this and I find it remarkable that there is no explanation as to why they have rejected the proposal." Backing a centrally-funded all-Wales service, he told BBC Wales' Dragon's Eye: "I simply don't know why they have done this and I find it remarkable that there is no explanation as to why they have rejected the proposal."
The charity Voices from Care have also been highly critical of the decision. The charity Voices from Care was also critical of the decision.
"The advocacy board put forward by [the] Welsh assembly government is a red herring and falls way short of being an independent body, as it will continue to allow local authorities to fund the people who are meant to speak out against them," said chief executive, Deborah Jones. "The advocacy board put forward by [the] Welsh assembly government is a red herring and falls way short of being an independent body, as it will continue to allow local authorities to fund the people who are meant to speak out against them," said chief executive Deborah Jones.
"Only a truly independent and centrally funded advocacy unit with its own commissioning powers will provide the safeguards that could help prevent future exploitation as evidenced in the North Wales Child Abuse Inquiry." "Only a truly independent and centrally funded advocacy unit with its own commissioning powers will provide the safeguards that could help prevent future exploitation as evidenced in the north Wales child abuse inquiry."