This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/scotland/south_of_scotland/7293290.stm
The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Previous version
1
Next version
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Rail funds commitment questioned | |
(about 4 hours later) | |
The Scottish Government has been accused of investing "not one penny" in a rail link between Edinburgh and the Borders since it came to power. | |
Lib Dem MSP Jeremy Purvis also called for plans to fund the bulk of scheme by a non-profit company to be scrapped. | |
Transport Minister Stewart Stevenson defended the government's approach to the project and choice of funding. | |
He said it would allow the "expertise and innovation" of the private sector to help deliver the scheme. | |
It emerged last week that the project costs for reopening the Waverley line could be as high as £295m - more than twice the original estimate. | |
The completion date for the scheme had also slipped from 2011 to 2013. | |
The Borders aren't the slightest bit interested in where the money is coming from Stewart StevensonTransport minister | |
Mr Stevenson confirmed plans to use a non-profit method to fund the line between Edinburgh and Tweedbank near Galashiels. | |
However, Mr Purvis urged the Scottish Government to go back to funding the project directly. | |
"Since May 2007 not one penny has been invested by the government into this project and there has been a stall on the design process," said the MSP for Tweeddale, Ettrick and Lauderdale. | |
He said "urgent clarification" was needed over the funding method and the timetable for setting up the non-profit making company. | |
"So far the SNP have added confusion where there should have been clarity," he said. | |
"They have added delay where there should have been progress. | |
"We need to restore the funding, up front capital funding from the Scottish Government, for urgent progress for the construction of this railway." | |
MSPs voiced concerns about the funding of the project | |
Mr Stevenson defended the government's record. | |
"Much has been made of the issue of finance," he said. | |
"As advised last week, we intend to deliver this scheme using a non-profit distributing (NPD) model. | |
"This means we will use the expertise and innovation present in the private sector to deliver this public infrastructure project." | |
He said it meant any "excessive profits" could be reinvested for the good of the community. | |
"The Borders aren't the slightest bit interested in where the money is coming from," he said. | |
"The Borders are interested in it being spent to deliver a railway for the benefit of the people of the Borders. | |
"Our plans will ensure this railway is built on time and on budget." | |
'No assurances' | |
Labour's Des McNulty said the funding method was "experimental" and "untested". | |
"Whether this project can progress is now dependent on the attitude of the banks to the funding package," he said. | |
He said the minister had given "no assurances" that funding could be in place for work to start within the lifetime of this parliament. | |
Tory Alex Johnstone said it was "disappointing but not at all surprising" that the project had suffered delays. | |
He also voiced concerns about the rail line covering only a "small area" of the Borders. |
Previous version
1
Next version