This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-34993428

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Criminal courts charge to be scrapped by government Criminal courts charge to be scrapped by government
(about 3 hours later)
The criminal courts charge is to be scrapped from 24 December, Justice Secretary Michael Gove has announced.The criminal courts charge is to be scrapped from 24 December, Justice Secretary Michael Gove has announced.
Since April, convicted criminals in England and Wales have had to pay a charge of between £150 and £1,200 towards the cost of their case.Since April, convicted criminals in England and Wales have had to pay a charge of between £150 and £1,200 towards the cost of their case.
But Mr Gove said "while the intention behind the policy was honourable in reality that intent has fallen short".But Mr Gove said "while the intention behind the policy was honourable in reality that intent has fallen short".
MPs had called for it to be axed and the Magistrates Association said the decision was "tremendously welcome".MPs had called for it to be axed and the Magistrates Association said the decision was "tremendously welcome".
The charge is paid on top of fines, compensation orders and defendants' own legal charges, and is higher for those convicted after pleading not guilty.The charge is paid on top of fines, compensation orders and defendants' own legal charges, and is higher for those convicted after pleading not guilty.
It is set according to the type of case, with the minimum charge for magistrates' courts and the maximum level for crown court cases.It is set according to the type of case, with the minimum charge for magistrates' courts and the maximum level for crown court cases.
'Perverse incentives''Perverse incentives'
In March, the then Justice Secretary Chris Grayling said the fee would ensure that criminals "pay their way".In March, the then Justice Secretary Chris Grayling said the fee would ensure that criminals "pay their way".
But MPs on the Justice Committee published a report in November in which they said the fee, which is not means-tested, created "serious problems" and was often "grossly disproportionate".But MPs on the Justice Committee published a report in November in which they said the fee, which is not means-tested, created "serious problems" and was often "grossly disproportionate".
The cross-party group's chairman, Conservative MP Bob Neill, said they evidence they had received raised "grave misgivings" about the fee's benefits and whether it was "compatible with the principles of justice".The cross-party group's chairman, Conservative MP Bob Neill, said they evidence they had received raised "grave misgivings" about the fee's benefits and whether it was "compatible with the principles of justice".
He said it created "perverse incentives - not only for defendants to plead guilty but for sentencers to reduce awards of compensation and prosecution costs".He said it created "perverse incentives - not only for defendants to plead guilty but for sentencers to reduce awards of compensation and prosecution costs".
Mr Gove, Mr Grayling's successor as justice secretary, announced it was being dropped, during a meeting of the Magistrates' Association Council.Mr Gove, Mr Grayling's successor as justice secretary, announced it was being dropped, during a meeting of the Magistrates' Association Council.
The Magistrates' Association's national chairman, Malcolm Richardson said: "This is an enormous success for the MA (Magistrates' Association) but most importantly for justice in our criminal courts system.The Magistrates' Association's national chairman, Malcolm Richardson said: "This is an enormous success for the MA (Magistrates' Association) but most importantly for justice in our criminal courts system.
"In my 26 years as a magistrate I have never seen such a powerful reaction from my colleagues on the bench and Michael Gove's announcement is therefore tremendously welcome.""In my 26 years as a magistrate I have never seen such a powerful reaction from my colleagues on the bench and Michael Gove's announcement is therefore tremendously welcome."
There would be "an audible sigh of relief" from magistrates "as this iniquitous charge will cease to be, he said", and added that Mr Gove's decision was "testimony to his collaborative approach".There would be "an audible sigh of relief" from magistrates "as this iniquitous charge will cease to be, he said", and added that Mr Gove's decision was "testimony to his collaborative approach".
The Howard League for Penal Reform - which has called for the fee policy to be suspended - also welcomed the news, saying the charge was "simply unfair".The Howard League for Penal Reform - which has called for the fee policy to be suspended - also welcomed the news, saying the charge was "simply unfair".
Its chief executive, Frances Crook said: "This is a victory for justice. It augurs well for changes being made to the courts and penal systems, which both need radical reform."Its chief executive, Frances Crook said: "This is a victory for justice. It augurs well for changes being made to the courts and penal systems, which both need radical reform."
Commenting on the news, Labour said it had warned from the start that the "mandatory nature of the fee could lead to miscarriages of justice" and welcomed that it "has finally been scrapped".Commenting on the news, Labour said it had warned from the start that the "mandatory nature of the fee could lead to miscarriages of justice" and welcomed that it "has finally been scrapped".
Mr Gove told Parliament in November that the charge was generating revenue and helping to "ensure that the taxpayer is not the first port of call for supporting the way in which our courts operate". Mr Gove told Parliament in November that the charge was generating revenue and helping to "ensure that the taxpayer is not the first port of call for supporting the way in which our courts operate, but it is important that we balance all the criteria in making a judgment on the review of the charge".