This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/wales/south_west/7281969.stm

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Badger-baiting verdicts expected Badger-baiters given jail warning
(about 3 hours later)
A district judge is set to return his verdict following the trial of two men accused of badger-baiting. A district judge has warned two men they face jail sentences after finding them guilty of badger-baiting.
Simon Evans, 40, and Peter McGuigan, 37, deny five charges brought by the RSPCA at Llanelli magistrates' court. Simon Evans, 40, and Peter McGuigan, 37, denied four charges brought by the RSPCA at Llanelli magistrates' court.
It is alleged police caught them in the act of disturbing a badger sett near Boncath in Pembrokeshire and one of their dogs had a badger in its mouth. Police caught them in the act of disturbing a badger sett near Boncath in Pembrokeshire and one of their dogs had a badger in its mouth.
The friends, from Llandysul on the Ceredigion and Carmarthenshire border, said they were legally hunting rabbits. District judge Mark Layton said it was a "pre-planned and sophisticated operation."
District judge Mark Layton finished hearing evidence on Thursday. He found them guilty of four charges but cleared them of another charge involving possession of a net.
The prosecution case is that both men went equipped to hunt badgers on the morning of 14 October, 2006. "I view these matters extremely seriously and in my view this type of offence should attract a custodial sentence."
The two friends, from Llandysul on the Ceredigion and Carmarthenshire border, were remanded on bail for reports and sentence was adjourned until 3 April.
The men had claimed they were legally hunting rabbits.
But the prosecution claimed that both men went equipped to hunt badgers on the morning of 14 October, 2006.
They were heard by a nearby landowner, who called police.They were heard by a nearby landowner, who called police.
This was an ordinary day out rabbiting for them Carina Hughes, defendingThis was an ordinary day out rabbiting for them Carina Hughes, defending
When officers arrived a "limp" badger was found in the mouth of a lercher dog belonging to them, the court was told.When officers arrived a "limp" badger was found in the mouth of a lercher dog belonging to them, the court was told.
A metre deep hole had been dug close to a badger sett and shovels carried by the friends were stained in blood.A metre deep hole had been dug close to a badger sett and shovels carried by the friends were stained in blood.
It is claimed the men "flushed" a badger out of its hole and then watched the "sport" as their dogs fought with it.It is claimed the men "flushed" a badger out of its hole and then watched the "sport" as their dogs fought with it.
But in her closing submission Carina Hughes, representing Mr McGuigan, urged the judge to acquit both men. But in her closing submission Carina Hughes, representing McGuigan, had urged the judge to acquit both men.
'Unfortunate accident''Unfortunate accident'
"This was an ordinary day out rabbiting for them," she said."This was an ordinary day out rabbiting for them," she said.
Ms Hughes said they had no idea they were close to a badger sett and it was an "accident" that the dogs had become involved in a fight with a badger.Ms Hughes said they had no idea they were close to a badger sett and it was an "accident" that the dogs had become involved in a fight with a badger.
"All the equipment they had could be used for rabbiting," she said."All the equipment they had could be used for rabbiting," she said.
"The dogs accidentally came across the badger. They [Mr Evans and Mr McGuigan] knew by what was happening that these animals were hurting one another. "The dogs accidentally came across the badger. They [Evans and McGuigan] knew by what was happening that these animals were hurting one another.
"They knew that these animals needed separating - they did not want this to happen."They knew that these animals needed separating - they did not want this to happen.
"This unfortunate accident occurred and these men did everything they could.""This unfortunate accident occurred and these men did everything they could."