This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/11/world/europe/dieudonne-mbala-mbala-france-european-rights-court.html
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 1 | Version 2 |
---|---|
Court Rules Against French Comedian Dieudonné in Free-Speech Case | Court Rules Against French Comedian Dieudonné in Free-Speech Case |
(about 9 hours later) | |
LONDON — In 2008, the French comedian Dieudonné M’bala M’bala finished a performance in Paris by inviting a Holocaust denier onstage to receive a prize from an actor dressed in striped pajamas resembling a concentration camp uniform, with a yellow star bearing the word “Jew.” | |
The prize was a three-branch candelabrum with three apples on top. | The prize was a three-branch candelabrum with three apples on top. |
Mr. M’bala M’bala was convicted the next year on hate crime charges and fined 10,000 euros, or $10,750, in connection with the performance, and he eventually took his case to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, France. | Mr. M’bala M’bala was convicted the next year on hate crime charges and fined 10,000 euros, or $10,750, in connection with the performance, and he eventually took his case to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, France. |
On Tuesday, the court ruled against him, saying that laws on freedom of expression did not offer protection for anti-Semitic comments or statements denying the Holocaust. The case has highlighted growing tensions in France between the country’s commitment to free speech and the desire to prevent hate crimes. | |
Mr. M’bala M’bala’s brand of comedy has been widely condemned, while at the same time gaining support from some French Muslims, disgruntled youth and members of the far right. He lamented in 2013 that a prominent Jewish journalist had not died in “the gas chambers.” | |
All the while, Mr. M’bala M’bala has argued that his dark humor is not anti-Semitic but rather aimed squarely at the French establishment. | |
The Strasbourg court disagreed, and it said in its decision that the offending scene could not be construed as entertainment and that it instead resembled a political meeting that, under the pretext of comedy, promoted Holocaust denial. | The Strasbourg court disagreed, and it said in its decision that the offending scene could not be construed as entertainment and that it instead resembled a political meeting that, under the pretext of comedy, promoted Holocaust denial. |
The performance, even if satirical or provocative, the court found, was not protected under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, on the right to freedom of expression. “Disguised as an artistic production,” the court said, the performance “was in fact as dangerous as a head-on and sudden attack.” | |
Mr. M’bala M’bala’s defenders argue that he is being subjected to a double standard and that the hate-speech laws have not been employed to prevent insults against Islam. They point, for example, to caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad that were published in the satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo, which was targeted in terrorist attacks in France in January. | |