This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/01/world/europe/russia-military-force.html

The article has changed 14 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 11 Version 12
Russia Launches Airstrikes in Syria, Adding a New Wrinkle Russians Strike Targets in Syria, but Not ISIS Areas
(about 2 hours later)
MOSCOW — President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia ordered a round of airstrikes in Syria on Wednesday, adding an unpredictable and potentially destabilizing element to a complex sectarian war that has drawn in the United States and regional powers while creating millions of refugees. WASHINGTON — Russian aircraft carried out a bombing attack against Syrian opposition fighters on Wednesday, including at least one group trained by the C.I.A., eliciting angry protests from American officials and plunging the complex sectarian war there into dangerous new territory.
While Moscow’s stated purpose in Syria is to fight Islamic State militants, Russian warplanes and helicopter gunships dropped bombs north of the central city of Homs, in an area held by rebel groups opposed to Syria’s president, Bashar al-Assad, a Russian ally. The attacks were unleashed hours after the upper house of Russia’s rubber-stamp Parliament authorized the use of force abroad. Russia’s entry into the Syrian conflict, foreshadowed by a rapid military buildup in the past three weeks at an airbase in Latakia, Syria, makes the possibility of a political settlement in Syria more difficult and creates a new risk of inadvertent incidents between American and Russian warplanes flying in the same area. And it adds a powerful but unpredictable combatant to a civil war that has already resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths and a flood of refugees.
At a meeting of government officials in Moscow on Wednesday, Mr. Putin defended the Russian intervention as a broad stroke against terrorism. “The only right way to fight international terrorism — and it is gangs of international terrorists that are fighting in Syria and in neighboring countries — is to act preventively,” he said, “to fight and destroy militants and terrorists on the territories that they already occupied, not wait for them to come to our house.” President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia justified his country’s entry into the conflict by saying that Russia was acting “preventatively, to fight and destroy militants and terrorists on the territories that they already occupied, not wait for them to come to our house.”
Western diplomats warned that Russia would be sending a dangerous message if its attacks were aimed primarily against opponents of Mr. Assad, rather than the Islamic State. But American officials said the attack was not directed at the Islamic State but at other opposition groups fighting against the government of the Syrian president, Bashar al-Assad, whom Mr. Putin has vowed to support. American officials said Russian warplanes and helicopter gunships dropped bombs north of the central city of Homs, where there are few, if any, militants of the Islamic State, also known as ISIS or ISIL.
“We need the Russians to understand that in coming to defense of the regime to attack ISIL, what they will do is forge a single united force under ISIL leadership against the regime,” said the British foreign secretary, Philip Hammond, using an alternate name for the Islamic State. “That’s the huge danger we face.” “By supporting Assad and seemingly taking on everybody fighting Assad,” Defense Secretary Ashton B. Carter said on Wednesday, Russia is “taking on the whole rest of the country that’s fighting Assad.” Some of those groups, he added, are supported by the United States and need to be part of a political resolution in Syria.
Analysts have warned that Russia’s military activities are likely to prolong and complicate the war, as they could keep Mr. Assad in office and add Russia to the already tangled patchwork of forces deployed there. “That’s why the Russian position is doomed to fail,” Mr. Carter said.
John Kirby, a State Department spokesman, told reporters at the United Nations that Russia had warned the United States before the attacks, and that it had requested that American and allied aircraft avoid Syrian airspace during the missions. Both Mr. Carter and Secretary of State John Kerry were critical of Russia for failing to fully inform American officials ahead of time of their mission. The notification consisted of contacting the American Embassy in Baghdad one hour before the strikes with the warning that American planes should avoid Syrian airspace. No effort was made to coordinate the airstrikes with American air operations in the region.
But Secretary of State John Kerry, speaking at the United Nations, made it clear that U.S.-led airstrikes would not be curtailed, and said that the latest strike against Islamic State targets had been carried out “in the last hour.” Illustrating the widening complexity of the war, the United States conducted its own airstrikes in Syria on Wednesday, near Aleppo, without warning to the Russians. “No, we did not,” an American official said afterward. “It should come as a surprise to no one that we’re conducting airstrikes in Syria.”
“These strikes will continue,” he told the Security Council. Mr. Kerry raised Russia’s handling of the mission Wednesday morning with Sergey V. Lavrov, the Russian foreign minister, and after a late-afternoon meeting at the United Nations, Mr. Kerry told reporters that the two sides had agreed to begin talks on avoiding unintended confrontations in Syria and clarifying which targets the Russians are picking as soon as possible, maybe even Thursday.
American officials in Baghdad said the Russian warning came from an official in Baghdad, who informed staff members at the United States Embassy there that Russian military aircraft would begin conducting a mission. They emphasized that the Russians had not provided specific information on the mission or taken steps to “deconflict” the airstrike with American air operations in the region, as the United States hoped. “It is one thing, obviously, to be targeting ISIL,” Mr. Kerry said. “We are concerned, obviously, that is not what’s happening.”
At a briefing Wednesday afternoon, Josh Earnest, the White House press secretary, confirmed that United States military officials had yet to have any conversations with their Russian counterparts to ensure that the two sides do not accidentally attack or stumble into each other. Though Russia and the United States remain far apart on the critical question of whether Mr. Assad should remain in power, Mr. Kerry said that the two sides had agreed to explore “options” to ease the conflict. “We think we have some very specific steps that may be able to help lead in the right direction,” said Mr. Kerry, who did not provide any details. “That needs to be properly explored.”
As a practical matter, coalition warplanes rarely fly in the area of Syria where Russian jets carried out their strikes, because Islamic State militants do not operate there. However, there have been occasional American strikes against the Khorasan Group, a group of senior Qaeda operatives who American officials say are plotting attacks against the West. At least one and possibly more Syrian opposition groups that have been secretly armed and trained by the C.I.A. were among the rebel groups targeted by the Russian airstrikes, a senior United States official said. The official would not identify which group or groups were attacked or where they were located. Nor would he assess the damages or casualties suffered by the Syrian fighters other than to say, “It was not minor.” American officials said they were still sorting through the battle damage reports coming in from the field.
While the Pentagon’s $500 million program to train and equip Syrian fighters has largely failed — at one point this month only four or five American-trained combatants were in the fight in Syria — the C.I.A.’s covert program to train other fighters has weathered some setbacks to produce 3,000 to 5,000 fighters in the nearly two years it has been operating.
Mr. Kerry, speaking to the Security Council, warned Russia not to carry out airstrikes in areas of Syria in which the Islamic State is not believed to be operating. With his Russian counterpart in the chair, Mr. Kerry said that the Obama administration would welcome “any genuine effort” by Moscow to target the Islamic State and the Nusra Front, Al Qaeda’s branch in Syria.
But Mr. Kerry made clear that the United States would have “grave concerns” if the Russians bombed other moderate rebel groups and repeated the American position that Mr. Assad would eventually need to leave power as part of a political transition that would be intended to bring peace to Syria. He also said that the United States-led coalition is poised “to dramatically accelerate” airstrikes against the Islamic State.
When a reporter asked Mr. Lavrov about Mr. Carter’s assertion that the Russian airstrikes appeared to have been directed at parts of Syria not known to be under the control of the Islamic State, he said, “Don’t listen to the Pentagon about the Russian strikes.”
But Western diplomats warned that Russia was sending a dangerous message if its attacks were aimed primarily against opponents of Mr. Assad, rather than the Islamic State.
“We need the Russians to understand that in coming to defense of the regime to attack ISIL, what they will do is forge a single united force under ISIL leadership against the regime,” said the British foreign secretary, Philip Hammond. “That’s the huge danger we face.”
A spokesman for the Russian Defense Ministry, Maj. Gen. Igor Konashenkov, said its pilots were engaged in precision strikes “against the military equipment, communication centers, transport vehicles, arms depots, ammunition and fuels and lubricant materials belonging to ISIS terrorists.”A spokesman for the Russian Defense Ministry, Maj. Gen. Igor Konashenkov, said its pilots were engaged in precision strikes “against the military equipment, communication centers, transport vehicles, arms depots, ammunition and fuels and lubricant materials belonging to ISIS terrorists.”
Although Russia and Syrian state television both said the attacks were conducted against Islamic State targets, they appear to have hit areas controlled primarily by rival insurgent groups that oppose both Mr. Assad and the Islamic State. But in a video on YouTube, a rebel commander in Hama Province, Jamil al-Saleh, said that his forces had eavesdropped on communications between Syrian Air Force pilots and their bases, which confirmed that Russian warplanes were aloft. His group, the Izza Gathering, is one of the remaining fragments of the loosely knit Free Syrian Army, relatively secular groups that have received some Western support.
In a video on YouTube, a rebel commander in Hama Province, Jamil al-Saleh, said that his forces had eavesdropped on communications between Syrian Air Force pilots and their bases, which confirmed that Russian warplanes were aloft. His group, the Izza Gathering, is one of the remaining fragments of the loosely-knit Free Syrian Army, relatively secular groups that have received some Western support. The attacks, according to state-run television and rebel sources, occurred north of Homs and into Hama Province. Recent advances in Hama by a coalition of insurgents opposed to Mr. Assad as well as to the Islamic State have posed new threats to the coastal Alawite heartland, where Mr. Assad enjoys his strongest support. That coalition has a range of groups, including the Nusra Front, less-extremist Islamist groups and relatively secular groups like Mr. Saleh’s.
Mr. Earnest said the Pentagon had not determined who the targets were. “We have a variety of ways, particularly given our presence in the region, to evaluate exactly what Russia’s military operations are resulting in,” he said, “and that’s something our Department of Defense is looking into.”
The attacks, according to state-run television and rebel sources, occurred north of Homs and into Hama Province. Recent advances in Hama by a coalition of insurgents opposed to Mr. Assad as well as to the Islamic State have posed new threats to the coastal Alawite heartland where Mr. Assad enjoys his strongest support. That coalition has a range of groups including the Nusra Front, Al Qaeda’s branch in Syria; less extremist Islamist groups, and relatively secular groups like Mr. Saleh’s.
In his comments, Mr. Putin said that the only long-term solution for Syria was through political change and dialogue between the opposition and the government. “I know that President Assad understands that and is ready for this process,” Mr. Putin said. He said Russia hoped Mr. Assad would make “compromises in the name of his country and his people.”In his comments, Mr. Putin said that the only long-term solution for Syria was through political change and dialogue between the opposition and the government. “I know that President Assad understands that and is ready for this process,” Mr. Putin said. He said Russia hoped Mr. Assad would make “compromises in the name of his country and his people.”
The United States has long held that Mr. Assad, who has presided over a war that has killed well over 200,000 Syrians, many at the hands of his security forces, must step down before a stable peace can be achieved. Lately, President Obama has added some nuance, saying that Mr. Assad could be part of a “managed transition” to a new government. But the United States has long held that Mr. Assad must step down before a stable peace can be achieved. Lately, President Obama has added some nuance, saying that Mr. Assad could be part of a “managed transition” to a new government.
In Syria, the state-run news media strongly endorsed the move by Russia. Supporters of Mr. Assad seemed particularly pleased that Moscow was sending military aid because they felt his endorsement at the United Nations two days ago was a bit tepid.In Syria, the state-run news media strongly endorsed the move by Russia. Supporters of Mr. Assad seemed particularly pleased that Moscow was sending military aid because they felt his endorsement at the United Nations two days ago was a bit tepid.
Mr. Kerry said the Obama administration would welcome “any genuine effort” by Moscow to target the Islamic State and Jabhet al-Nusra, a rebel group linked to Al Qaeda. But Mr. Kerry made clear that the United States would have “grave concerns” if the Russians bombed other moderate rebel groups. Mr. Putin harbors both international and domestic reasons for interfering in Syria. On the international front, he wants to restore Russian influence as a global power and try to force an end to the diplomatic and financial isolation the West imposed after Moscow seized Crimea and supported separatists in southeastern Ukraine. He also wants to maintain control over Russia’s naval station at Tartus, in Syria, its only remaining overseas military base outside the former Soviet Union.
He also called for a revival of a stalled United Nations-led peace process, with the understanding that Mr. Assad must “decline to be part of its long-term future.” Any international effort to broker a political deal would be seen as “a farce” if it sustained Mr. Assad’s hold on power, Mr. Kerry added.
The Russian airstrikes came the same day the government announced intensive maneuvers involving Mi-28 attack helicopters and others in southern Russia.
Mr. Putin harbors both international and domestic reasons for interfering in Syria.
On the international front, he wants to restore Russian influence as a global power and try to force an end to the diplomatic and financial isolation the West imposed after Moscow seized Crimea and supported separatists in southeastern Ukraine. He also wants to maintain control over Russia’s naval station at Tartus, in Syria, its only remaining overseas military base outside the former Soviet Union.
Domestically, he wants to draw attention away from the Ukraine conflict and the troubled Russian economy, as well as to burnish his image as an international man of action who solves problems.
“Geopolitics and the desire to protect Russia’s influence in the Mediterranean is the main motive,” said Alexei Makarkin, the deputy director of the Center for Political Technologies. “The second motive is to limit the flow of Islamic State recruiters into Russia.”
Russian surveillance drones have been sighted over parts of Syria where other rebel groups are deployed, specifically those around Aleppo in Idlib Province that threaten Latakia. Drone activity has been absent in northeast Syria, where Islamic State militants controls major urban centers.
To American officials, the drone flights confirmed suspicions that Russia’s primary purpose in Syria is to bolster the fortunes of Mr. Assad’s deteriorating forces, not to fight terrorism. Military experts in Moscow, however, suggested that Russian drones lack the range to reach northeastern Syria, but had to stay within range of their base in Latakia, on the Mediterranean.
The Israeli newspaper Haaretz, quoting anonymous Israeli officials, reported that Russia had also informed Israeli security officials about an hour before the aerial strikes in Syria. Last week Mr. Putin and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel agreed to create a coordination mechanism to avoid confrontation between Israeli and Russian aircraft over Syria.
Russia had already said it would establish an information center in Baghdad so that Iran, Iraq and Syria could pool intelligence about the Islamic State, which controls wide stretches of territory in Iraq and Syria.