This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/01/world/europe/russia-military-force.html

The article has changed 14 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Russia Approves Using Forces Abroad Amid Buildup in Syria Russia Approves Using Military Abroad Amid Dispute With West Over Syria
(about 2 hours later)
MOSCOW — President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia sought and won approval from the upper house of Parliament on Wednesday to use military force abroad, in what officials said was another step toward Russian troops joining the fight in Syria. MOSCOW — President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia, in the latest step in his dispute with the West over the crisis in Syria, sought and won approval from the upper house of Parliament on Wednesday to use military force abroad.
Mr. Putin has repeatedly emphasized that the use of Russian ground forces was not envisioned in the near term. But Russia has moved at least 32 combat aircraft to Syria, according to United States intelligence sources, and the measure quickly approved by the upper house, the Federation Council, on Wednesday authorized them to join the fight. Russian officials portrayed the move as an attempt both to fight Islamic State militants and to try to ensure the survival of President Bashar al-Assad of Syria, Russia’s main ally in the Middle East. But Russian intervention would most likely prolong and complicate the war, as it would keep Mr. Assad in office and would add Russian forces to those already on Syrian missions.
The Kremlin has stepped up its aid to Syria over the past few months, mainly to bolster the position of President Bashar al-Assad of Syria, Russia’s main ally in the Middle East. Mr. Putin’s chief of staff, Sergei B. Ivanov, told the Federation Council that the authorization was for the Russian Air Force, not ground troops, and was for an open-ended period. Sergei B. Ivanov, Mr. Putin’s chief of staff, appealed to the upper house, the Federation Council, for the measure, describing it as an open-ended deployment of the Russian Air Force to support Mr. Assad — at his request — in his fight against the Islamic State.
“It will be air support for the Syrian forces in their struggle with ISIS,” Mr. Ivanov said, referring to the Islamic State. He added that the move respected international law because Mr. Assad had requested the help. “We are going to use only the air force,” Mr. Ivanov said in remarks to a closed session of the council that were broadcast after the measure was approved unanimously, 162 to 0. The use of ground forces was “excluded,” Mr. Ivanov said, repeating what Mr. Putin has emphasized in recent weeks.
Although approval by the Federation Council is generally considered a rubber stamp, a similar vote preceded the deployment of Russian forces in Ukraine in March 2014. “It will be air support for the Syrian forces in their struggle with ISIS,” Mr. Ivanov said, using another term for the Islamic State.
Although approval by the Federation Council is generally considered a rubber stamp, a similar vote preceded the deployment of Russian forces in Ukraine in March 2014, including to Crimea, which Russia annexed.
The Federation Council withdrew that approval in late June 2014. After that, Russia described any soldiers fighting in southeast Ukraine as “volunteers,” although Ukraine and its Western supporters continued to accuse Russia of deploying its forces across the border.
The Russian authorization of force came just two days after Mr. Putin and President Obama met on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly in New York, where they clashed over Syria. Mr. Putin says Mr. Assad is a bulwark against the Islamic State, while Mr. Obama says the Syrian war cannot be resolved until Mr. Assad leaves.
Mr. Putin called for a grand international coalition to fight the Islamic State, saying in his speech at the United Nations that the world needed to support Mr. Assad and Kurdish forces fighting on the ground in order to defeat the Islamic State, much as the world fought Hitler during World War II.
But Mr. Obama emphasized that the United States wants Mr. Assad to go, a position seconded by crucial allies in the region, like Saudi Arabia.
Although the two men failed to reach an agreement on Syria, the United States and Russia are expected to try to establish some coordination to ensure that Western warplanes that have been flying missions against the Islamic State for a year do not clash with the Russian planes.
For weeks, the United States said that Russia was deploying military equipment and soldiers to a Syrian airfield near Latakia. Russian officials said the cargo carriers flying to the site were delivering humanitarian aid.
Russian surveillance drones have been sighted over parts of Syria where other rebel groups are deployed, specifically those in Idlib Province that threaten Latakia. Latakia is the heart of the coastal homeland of much of the Alawite minority elite that runs Syria, including the Assad clan.
Russian drones have not been sighted over Islamic State-controlled areas in northwestern Syria, even though Mr. Ivanov said on Wednesday that Russia was mainly trying to fight the Islamic State and was not trying to expand its influence in the Middle East. Roughly 2,400 Russians are believed to have joined the Islamic State.
“We are not speaking of achieving anybody’s ambitions, as our Western partners regularly accuse us,” Mr. Ivanov said. “We are speaking exclusively about the national interests of the Russian federation.”
Russia had already said it would establish an information center in Baghdad so that Iran, Iraq and Syria could pool intelligence about the Islamic State, which controls wide stretches of territory in Iraq and Syria.