This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-34173126

The article has changed 10 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 6 Version 7
EU referendum: Cameron suffers Commons defeat over 'purdah' rules EU referendum: Cameron suffers Commons defeat over 'purdah' rules
(about 3 hours later)
The new government has suffered its first defeat in the House of Commons, over changes to rules governing the in/out EU referendum campaign.The new government has suffered its first defeat in the House of Commons, over changes to rules governing the in/out EU referendum campaign.
Ministers wanted to amend so-called "purdah" rules which limit government activity during the campaign period.Ministers wanted to amend so-called "purdah" rules which limit government activity during the campaign period.
But Labour teamed up with rebel Tory MPs to block the move by 312 to 285 and ensure the normal rules would apply.But Labour teamed up with rebel Tory MPs to block the move by 312 to 285 and ensure the normal rules would apply.
Earlier, the government conceded a rebel Tory amendment preventing a snap poll from being held.Earlier, the government conceded a rebel Tory amendment preventing a snap poll from being held.
Tabled by Eurosceptic Conservative MP Bernard Jenkin, it requires ministers to give four months' notice of how the final purdah rules would work. Labour said the defeat was "humiliating" for the Conservative government.
The amendment had attracted support from Labour, meaning the government faced a possible defeat on it. MPs voted in favour of the EU Referendum Bill - which paves the way for an in-out referendum on Britain's EU membership by the end of 2017 - by 316 votes to 53, meaning it will pass to the House of Lords for further scrutiny.
MPs are debating the EU Referendum Bill - which paves the way for an in-out referendum on Britain's EU membership by the end of 2017 - at its final stages.
They are expected to approved the legislation later on Monday evening.
What is purdah?What is purdah?
Purdah is a long standing convention whereby governments refrain from making any major announcements in the run-up to general elections or other polls to avoid influencing their outcome.Purdah is a long standing convention whereby governments refrain from making any major announcements in the run-up to general elections or other polls to avoid influencing their outcome.
The existing rules were set out in legislation passed in 2000. They prevent ministers, departments and local authorities from publishing any "promotional material" arguing for or against any particular outcome or referring to any of the issues involved in the referendum.The existing rules were set out in legislation passed in 2000. They prevent ministers, departments and local authorities from publishing any "promotional material" arguing for or against any particular outcome or referring to any of the issues involved in the referendum.
The rules, which apply to the 28 days up to polling day, do not preclude ministers from issuing press notices or responding to specific requests for information from members of the public.The rules, which apply to the 28 days up to polling day, do not preclude ministers from issuing press notices or responding to specific requests for information from members of the public.
The government agreed to restore purdah restrictions for the EU referendum in response to Euroceptics' concerns Prime Minister David Cameron could use the Whitehall publicity machine to promote continued EU membership. David Cameron had already made a number of concessions on the bill in response to Eurosceptic concerns the government could use the "Whitehall machine" to promote continued EU membership.
But ministers said there should be certain exemptions to the rules to enable ministers and others to conduct EU business as usual during the referendum campaign. Ministers agreed to restore purdah restrictions for the referendum but with certain exceptions to allow ministers and others to conduct day-to-day business with the EU during the campaign period.
Arguing for a partial suspension of the normal purdah rules, Europe Minister David Lidington told MPs it would ensure the normal running of government business during the final weeks of the referendum campaign. Arguing for a partial suspension of the normal rules, Europe Minister David Lidington said it would provide "greater clarity and certainty" on what issues are covered by purdah and what issues would be open to a legal challenge.
"Limited modifications" to the purdah rules would enable the government to transcribe wider EU business "without legal risks", he said. He concluded by saying the package of proposals put forward by the government was "balanced and fair", and one in which the whole country could have confidence.
But he was accused by Tory Eurosceptic MP Sir Edward Leigh of offering "legalistic claptrap" in a bid to avoid a Commons defeat. Sir Edward said the process must be "considered to be fair" and argued for Labour's amendment - which would reinstate the full purdah rules in the bill - to be accepted.
Fellow Eurosceptic and Conservative MP Bernard Jenkin added his voice to calls for a tougher purdah regime to apply, saying the government "is taking us backwards with these proposals".
Labour's shadow Europe minister Pat McFadden, meanwhile, said the government's plans amounted to a watered-down version of purdah which could be further diluted by the proposed exceptions. He said the Opposition would only support the exceptions if the full definition of purdah was first restored to the bill.
'Humiliating defeat''Humiliating defeat'
But he was accused by Tory Eurosceptic MP Sir Edward Leigh of offering "legalistic claptrap" in a bid to avoid a defeat in the Commons. Analysis of the vote, which saw the government defeated by a majority of 27, showed that there were 37 Conservative rebels.
He said the process must be "considered to be fair" and argued for Labour's amendment - to reinstate the full purdah rules - to be accepted. They included five former Cabinet ministers: Liam Fox, John Redwood, Owen Paterson, Cheryl Gillan, and David Jones, and the chairman of the influential backbench 1922 Committee of Tory MPs, Graham Brady.
Commenting after the vote, shadow foreign secretary Hilary Benn said the government had tried to play "fast and loose" with the arrangements for the referendum.Commenting after the vote, shadow foreign secretary Hilary Benn said the government had tried to play "fast and loose" with the arrangements for the referendum.
"This is a humiliating defeat for David Cameron, with members from all sides of the House supporting Labour's approach to purdah, which ensures fairness in the conduct of the referendum campaign while permitting normal government business to take place," Mr Benn said."This is a humiliating defeat for David Cameron, with members from all sides of the House supporting Labour's approach to purdah, which ensures fairness in the conduct of the referendum campaign while permitting normal government business to take place," Mr Benn said.
"The government should never have rushed through its flawed plans to play fast and loose with the rules on the referendum." "The government should never have rushed through its flawed plans to play fast and loose with the rules on the referendum," he added.
No date has yet been set for the referendum on Britain's membership of the European Union but the prime minister has promised to hold the vote by the end of 2017. Earlier in the debate, the government conceded on Mr Jenkin's amendment which would prevent a snap poll from being held by requiring four months' notice of how the final purdah rules would work.
The debate on the EU Referendum Bill comes amid reports that business leaders are being urged to tone down attacks on the risk of EU exit. Mr Lidington said that while there were "drawbacks" to having a firm time limit he would accept the amendment "in the interests of bridge-building".
The Financial Times claimed Downing Street was privately advising pro-EU business figures to stop warning about the dangers of EU withdrawal for fear of undermining Mr Cameron's negotiating position. Mr Jenkin later told the Press Association that critics of the government's stance had "won the argument" and could look forward to a "fairer referendum".
No date has yet been set for the referendum on Britain's membership of the European Union but David Cameron has promised to hold the vote by the end of 2017.
The amendment had attracted support from Labour, meaning the government faced a possible defeat on it.
The Commons debate comes amid reports that business leaders are being urged to tone down attacks on the risk of EU exit.
The Financial Times claimed Downing Street was privately advising pro-EU business figures to stop warning about the dangers of EU withdrawal for fear of undermining David Cameron's negotiating position.