This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk/7260164.stm

The article has changed 15 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 4 Version 5
Mandatory DNA database rejected Mandatory DNA database rejected
(30 minutes later)
There are no plans to extend the DNA database to contain information from all people, the Home Office has said. Calls to put the DNA of every UK citizen on a national database are impractical, the government has said.
Calls for its content to be made universal have followed the conviction of two murderers using DNA evidence. Senior police officers have argued for a universal register after two killers were convicted on DNA evidence.
Suffolk serial killer Steve Wright and Sally Anne Bowman's murderer, Mark Dixie were both captured because their DNA was taken after unrelated offences. Suffolk serial murderer Steve Wright and Sally Anne Bowman's killer, Mark Dixie, were both captured because their DNA was taken after unrelated offences.
But the Home Office said a mandatory database "would raise significant practical and ethical issues". The Home Office said a mandatory database "would raise significant practical and ethical issues".
The DNA database, which covers England and Wales, currently contains around 4.5m profiles - routinely taken from criminal suspects after most arrests.The DNA database, which covers England and Wales, currently contains around 4.5m profiles - routinely taken from criminal suspects after most arrests.
How to maintain the security of a database with 4.5m people on it is one thing. Doing that for 60m people is another. Tony McNulty, Home Office minister 'Reasonable and proportionate'
However, it could be threatened when European judges are asked to rule next week on a test case of two Britons who want their details removed from the database. Steve Wright was on the system after being convicted of theft in 2003, and when police found his DNA on the bodies of some of his victims they matched it with his profile.
The applicants say their human rights have been infringed by the decision to leave their details on the database, despite the fact that they had never been found guilty of a crime. "It is my opinion that a national DNA register - with all its appropriate safeguards - could have identified Sally Anne's murderer within 24 hours Det Supt Stuart Cundy
Debate call
Steve Wright's profile was on the system after being convicted of theft in 2003.
When police found his DNA on the bodies of some of his victims they matched it with his profile.
But Mark Dixie was not on the system at the time of Sally Anne Bowman's murder.But Mark Dixie was not on the system at the time of Sally Anne Bowman's murder.
It was only when he was arrested for assault after a fight in a bar that his DNA was taken and he was linked to the murder. It was only when Dixie was arrested for assault after a fight in a bar that his DNA was taken and he was linked to the murder.
He was arrested within five hours.He was arrested within five hours.
Det Supt Stuart Cundy, who led the murder hunt, said: "It is my opinion that a national DNA register - with all its appropriate safeguards - could have identified Sally Anne's murderer within 24 hours. Det Supt Stuart Cundy, who led the murder hunt which led to Dixie's conviction, said: "It is my opinion that a national DNA register - with all its appropriate safeguards - could have identified Sally Anne's murderer within 24 hours.
"Instead it took nearly nine months before Mark Dixie was identified and almost two and a half years for justice to be done.""Instead it took nearly nine months before Mark Dixie was identified and almost two and a half years for justice to be done."
The Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo) is also calling for a debate on the issue.The Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo) is also calling for a debate on the issue.
'Vital role' Lincolnshire's Chief Constable, Tony Lake, speaks for the association on DNA.
The Chief Constable of Lincolnshire, Tony Lake, speaks for the association on DNA.
He said: "If there was a national database of everybody then we would solve more crime, of that there is absolutely no doubt.He said: "If there was a national database of everybody then we would solve more crime, of that there is absolutely no doubt.
How to maintain the security of a database with 4.5m people on it is one thing. Doing that for 60m people is another Tony McNulty, Home Office minister
"In the conviction of Steve Wright - and today of Mark Dixie - you've heard about the vital importance that DNA played. But any database that we hold has to be reasonable and proportionate in the eyes of the public.""In the conviction of Steve Wright - and today of Mark Dixie - you've heard about the vital importance that DNA played. But any database that we hold has to be reasonable and proportionate in the eyes of the public."
Human rights
Home Office minister Tony McNulty told BBC that a national database was not a "silver bullet" and that it would raise practical as well as civil liberties issues.Home Office minister Tony McNulty told BBC that a national database was not a "silver bullet" and that it would raise practical as well as civil liberties issues.
"How to maintain the security of a database with 4.5m people on it is one thing," he said."How to maintain the security of a database with 4.5m people on it is one thing," he said.
"Doing that for 60m people is another.""Doing that for 60m people is another."
However, the existing register could be threatened when European judges are asked to rule next week on a test case of two Britons who want their details removed from the database.
The applicants say their human rights have been infringed by the decision to leave their details on the database, despite the fact that they had never been found guilty of a crime.
The Times estimates if the two applicants succeed in their EU bid to have their records removed, 13% of the profiles on the database may have to be destroyed.The Times estimates if the two applicants succeed in their EU bid to have their records removed, 13% of the profiles on the database may have to be destroyed.
The pair, from Sheffield, had their DNA taken after they were arrested in 2001, but charges were not pressed.The pair, from Sheffield, had their DNA taken after they were arrested in 2001, but charges were not pressed.
They asked for their data to be removed from the DNA database but this was refused.They asked for their data to be removed from the DNA database but this was refused.
They are appealing on the grounds that Article Eight of the European Convention on Human Rights, the right to respect for private life, and Article 14, the prohibition of discrimination, have been violated.They are appealing on the grounds that Article Eight of the European Convention on Human Rights, the right to respect for private life, and Article 14, the prohibition of discrimination, have been violated.